Le 02/04/2012 18:00, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2012-04-02 16:31, Don Clugston wrote:
To be brutally honest, I don't think that's got much to do with the
language. It's got to do with Phobos adopting the Big Ball Of Mud design
pattern. There's no reason for the existing modules to be so huge.
Andrei and Walter's proposal does not break existing code because it
makes folders into modules.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:43 AM, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 02/04/2012 18:00, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2012-04-02 16:31, Don Clugston wrote:
To be brutally honest, I don't think
On 3 April 2012 19:58, Rory McGuire rjmcgu...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrei and Walter's proposal does not break existing code because it
makes folders into modules.
Completely off topic, but can you please refrain from top-posting? Its
not a big deal, just generally quoting above you is preferred.
On Apr 3, 2012 10:19 AM, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 03/04/2012 09:58, Rory McGuire a écrit :
Andrei and Walter's proposal does not break existing code because it
makes folders into modules.
Yes, I was explaining why a solution is needed here.
I think the public import method
Le 31/03/2012 02:25, Walter Bright a écrit :
On 3/30/2012 12:36 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/30/2012 12:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:27:43 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
I would argue that:
3. An extension method for an argument of type
On 30/03/12 12:22, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/30/2012 2:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrei and I have talked about it, and we think it is because of
difficulties in breaking a module up into submodules of a package.
We think it's something we need to address.
Eh? Other people have voiced
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 05:37:49 -0400, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:jl6a6a$1gh$1...@digitalmars.com...
Dudes, get an HD TV. It really is transformative. And yes, it kills me
that my expensive old large screen standard def TV is just a
On 2012-04-02 16:31, Don Clugston wrote:
To be brutally honest, I don't think that's got much to do with the
language. It's got to do with Phobos adopting the Big Ball Of Mud design
pattern. There's no reason for the existing modules to be so huge. Eg, I
created std.internal.math so that the
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:op.wb47llmueav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
I currently have an HD tube tv which runs at 1080i. The nice thing about
tubes is that standard definition *does* look more normal in it.
Yea. They don't make them anymore though :(
From: Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com
On Sunday, 1 April 2012 at 03:10:49 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
But I tend to listen to non-game stuff more: I'm a total whore for Anime
opening/closing themes.
Oh yes. Coincidentally, as I read this, I was playing
the opening from Zeta Gundam!
On Sunday, 1 April 2012 at 06:41:16 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
[Anzen Chitai] Suki Sa (One of the Maison Ikkoku openings)
[The Indigo] I Do! (ED1: Ai Yori Aoshi Enishi)
[Hitomi Takahashi] Aozora no Namida (OP1: Blood+)
[Yoko Kanno] Tank! (OP: Cowboy Bebop)
[Origa Yoko Kanno] Inner Universe
On Mar 31, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Don't know about satellite, but Cable turned to crap about a couple years
ago. It used to be very good, but then they started compressing the fuck out
of everything, and honest to god, half the time it looks like a fucking
On Sunday, 1 April 2012 at 21:06:09 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
How could I possibly forget that one?!?
Yes, Light's Theme from Death Note is indeed one of the best
anime songs
/ever/. Come to think of it, it would fit in very well on
Marilyn Manson's
Holywood album - *and* be one of the
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:56 +0200, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/30/2012 5:25 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Ah, I know how to fix it. Mark such instantiations as local ones, so
they are
mangled with the module name of where they were instantiated from.
so s...@so.so wrote in message
news:tnlksyhbnypfjbybm...@forum.dlang.org...
On Sunday, 1 April 2012 at 21:06:09 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
(L was a fantastic character period),
L is awesome.
Don't start with characters! Every character in SC and CB is just crazy
for starters. I mean
On 3/30/2012 5:25 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Ah, I know how to fix it. Mark such instantiations as local ones, so they are
mangled with the module name of where they were instantiated from.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7802
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:vcadggwxsbxhdkjhr...@forum.dlang.org...
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 22:43:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
But that would *never* happen under US-style IP law.
You know what's funny: I used to use an Atari ac adapter
for my Sega.
On 3/30/2012 11:16 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Adam D. Ruppedestructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
In my house's big room, I have a floor bed: a couple
blankets and pillows on the floor, next to my big tv.
(my big tv being a 20 year old 19 set! I'll use it till
it dies. Then duct tape it
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:jl6a6a$1gh$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 3/30/2012 11:16 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Adam D. Ruppedestructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
In my house's big room, I have a floor bed: a couple
blankets and pillows on the floor, next
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 09:35:25 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
So blowing hundreds of dollars just so half my stuff looks
*worse* and other stuff looks (to me) only marginally better?
Pass.
I've seen a few high def tvs. I like half of them, though
not enough to displace my old set.
The
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 07:02:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
And yes, it kills me that my expensive old large screen
standard def TV is just a POS in comparison, even though it is
in perfect working order.
It might help that I have smaller tv sets. I have a 19 and
a 13, and they have
On 3/31/12, Robert Clipsham rob...@octarineparrot.com wrote:
See also:
* http://wormsng.com/
* http://worms2d.info/4
* https://github.com/CyberShadow/ae
See anyone you recognize there? ;)
Aye, CS has been great to the WA community. :)
I wonder if Deadcode (another bWA contributor) uses D
Don't have the HD set stretch the image. Just watch it in the original format.
Personally, I just find that looking at an LCD display is easier on the eyes
than a CRT. Being able to mount it on the wall to get it away from the kids is
nice too.
On Mar 31, 2012, at 2:37 AM, Nick Sabalausky
Some of the fancier TVs operate at 120Hz and generate interpolated frames to
fill the gaps. It tends to cause all sorts of problems and look terrible.
Generally renders console games unplayable too, as it creates all sorts of
input lag.
On Mar 31, 2012, at 6:40 AM, Adam D. Ruppe
Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org wrote in message
news:mailman.1259.1333217864.4860.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Don't have the HD set stretch the image. Just watch it in the original
format.
Ew, then it'll be **tiny**. Esp if it's one of those 1080p sets (which I
think they all
On 3/31/2012 6:53 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 07:02:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
And yes, it kills me that my expensive old large screen standard def TV is
just a POS in comparison, even though it is in perfect working order.
It might help that I have smaller tv
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:fheaogseyibtulrhf...@forum.dlang.org...
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 07:02:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
And yes, it kills me that my expensive old large screen standard def TV
is just a POS in comparison, even though it is in
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:evxliildxhaodnbmq...@forum.dlang.org...
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 06:14:03 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
That's kind of another thing: If I need to be doing work, it's going to
be
damn hard if I have a bunch of games two clicks
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 23:01:32 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Certainly is. But *I* grew up on the original SegaCD version :)
I never got to play that version... but the song you mention
below, oh I know it. Track 9 on the playstation version
soundtrack cd.
I can't believe I've still
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 20:54:49 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Over-the-air broadcast literally looked *better* than that
*before* the digital switch! I'm not exagerating.
I don't doubt it, though I was on cable for a long
time.
Oh yea, and the set-top boxes themselves don't
even work
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ywifkafuypvfduunm...@forum.dlang.org...
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 20:54:49 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Oh yea, and the set-top boxes themselves don't
even work right anymore!
That was *terrible* when digital was new, but
On Saturday, March 31, 2012 05:37:49 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
Dudes, get an HD TV. It really is transformative. And yes, it kills me
that my expensive old large screen standard def TV is just a POS in
comparison, even though it is in
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:vxrvmmiapcbsemhea...@forum.dlang.org...
On Saturday, 31 March 2012 at 23:01:32 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
(Although I'll admit, I did enjoy Sewer Shark
hahhahaha relax, pretend it's a game... maybe it'll
even be fun. SHOOT THE
On Sunday, 1 April 2012 at 03:10:49 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
But I tend to listen to non-game stuff more: I'm a total whore
for Anime opening/closing themes.
Oh yes. Coincidentally, as I read this, I was playing
the opening from Zeta Gundam!
Another one I find incredibly addictive is one
On 3/30/2012 3:27 PM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
I asked because Delphi and D are the only ones I know that make friend classes
implicit :-)
I didn't know that about Delphi.
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote in message
news:mailman.1266.1333244549.4860.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
On Saturday, March 31, 2012 05:37:49 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
Dudes, get an HD TV. It really is
On Thursday, 29 March 2012 at 00:21:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/rif9x/uniform_function_call_syntax_for_the_d/
Andrei
The primitives/utility distinction is an idea I've thought about
a lot. UFCS is justifiable not only as a syntactic
On 2012-03-30 04:05, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
True, but I upgraded recently to 64 bit Win 7, with a 6 core processor and
SSD drive. Reddit seems a lot zippier :-)
I don't understand why people think it's ok for basic, basic shit that
On 3/29/2012 6:57 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
How the heck does that improve encapsualtion? With D's implicit friends, it
*doesn't*, it's just shifting things around. There is NO encapsualtion
benefit there. Like Steven said, to *get* the encapsualtion, you have to
create a whole new module to
On 3/29/2012 7:05 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't understand why people think it's ok for basic, basic shit that would
have ran fine on a Pentium 1 (and less) to now require what quite literally
is a super-fucking-computer-on-the-desktop just to run acceptably.
Seriously, what the fuck's the
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:jl3kkf$j4b$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 3/29/2012 6:57 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
How the heck does that improve encapsualtion? With D's implicit friends,
it
*doesn't*, it's just shifting things around. There is NO encapsualtion
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:jl3kar$ie4$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2012-03-30 04:05, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
True, but I upgraded recently to 64 bit Win 7, with a 6 core processor
and
SSD drive. Reddit seems a lot
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jl3n59$qf7$1...@digitalmars.com...
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:jl3kar$ie4$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2012-03-30 04:05, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
True, but I upgraded
On 03/30/2012 01:45 AM, bearophile wrote:
Timon Gehr:
I think the article does not mention that it also works for primitive types.
But there is a small problem with primitive properties:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7773
Bye,
bearophile
Yes, I have never understood why
On 3/30/2012 12:18 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
While there are definitely times I need to access private state across
separate components within a module, I find such cases are fairly uncommon,
so I question the wisdom of making it the default behavior.
If your module has grown so large that
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:jl3l0c$jn2$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 3/29/2012 7:05 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't understand why people think it's ok for basic, basic shit that
would
have ran fine on a Pentium 1 (and less) to now require what quite
or just use http://cdburnerxp.se/
Am 30.03.2012 10:30, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:jl3l0c$jn2$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 3/29/2012 7:05 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't understand why people think it's ok for basic, basic shit
On 3/30/12, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
There has been a trend in Phobos of having some truly gigantic modules. I
believe this is indicative of a problem in the language.
Ignoring that there are still a few import bugs, you can split
functionality into multiple modules and
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:jl3qds$10ga$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 3/30/2012 12:18 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
While there are definitely times I need to access private state across
separate components within a module, I find such cases are fairly
uncommon,
On 03/30/2012 02:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Eh? Other people have voiced concerns over that since waaay back in even
pre-D1 times. In particular, many people have argued for allowing modules
with the same name as a package. Ie: you could have both module foo and
module foo.bar.
This is
On 3/30/2012 2:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrei and I have talked about it, and we think it is because of
difficulties in breaking a module up into submodules of a package.
We think it's something we need to address.
Eh? Other people have voiced concerns over that since waaay back in even
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 01:55:23 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Yea, that occurred to me, too. wishful musingI've been
starting to think
more and more that the everything in a module is a friend was
a mistake,
and that we should have instead just had a module access
specifier like we
have
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:42:03 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/29/2012 6:57 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
How the heck does that improve encapsualtion? With D's implicit
friends, it
*doesn't*, it's just shifting things around. There is NO encapsualtion
benefit there.
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 10:22:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/30/2012 2:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrei and I have talked about it, and we think it is
because of
difficulties in breaking a module up into submodules of a
package.
We think it's something we need to address.
Eh?
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:21:12 -0400, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jl3n59$qf7$1...@digitalmars.com...
Yea, I've seen that. It's a very good article, though. Although I've
been
saying this since before that article, and even before multi-cores.
Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/29/2012 5:09 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The reason being, if you change anything in class A, you do not have
to worry
about the implementation of getXSquared, because it simply has no
access to the
private implementation. You only have to worry about internal
On 2012-03-30 10:20, Walter Bright wrote:
There has been a trend in Phobos of having some truly gigantic modules.
I believe this is indicative of a problem in the language. Andrei and I
have talked about it, and we think it is because of difficulties in
breaking a module up into submodules of a
Le 30/03/2012 11:40, bls a écrit :
On 03/30/2012 02:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Eh? Other people have voiced concerns over that since waaay back in even
pre-D1 times. In particular, many people have argued for allowing modules
with the same name as a package. Ie: you could have both module
Le 30/03/2012 12:57, foobar a écrit :
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 10:22:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/30/2012 2:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrei and I have talked about it, and we think it is because of
difficulties in breaking a module up into submodules of a package.
We think it's
Le 30/03/2012 01:34, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:53:57 -0400, Jesse Phillips
jessekphillip...@gmail.com wrote:
I won't be going out of my way to check this, but there is a mention
of adding the range primatives. This works, but it doesn't make the
class a range for
On 2012-03-30 10:36, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/30/12, Walter Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
There has been a trend in Phobos of having some truly gigantic modules. I
believe this is indicative of a problem in the language.
Ignoring that there are still a few import bugs, you can
Le 30/03/2012 04:13, Adam D. Ruppe a écrit :
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 01:55:23 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
wishful musingI've been starting to think
more and more that the everything in a module is a friend was a
mistake,and that we should have instead just had a module
access specifier like
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:10:14 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
I would expect this not to work, because bar isn't defined in module1
and template are supposed to use declaration scope, not instantiation
scope (unless it is mixin template).
Right, I think it's the way it works
On 2012-03-30 11:15, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I thought that was a deliberate Phobos style convention. I'm certain I
remember you and/or Andrei talking here about a year or two ago about how
you didn't want Phobos modules broken up into separate implemetation
modules.
I recognize that as well.
Le 30/03/2012 14:13, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:10:14 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
I would expect this not to work, because bar isn't defined in module1
and template are supposed to use declaration scope, not instantiation
scope (unless it is mixin
On 03/30/2012 05:06 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 30/03/2012 11:40, bls a écrit :
On 03/30/2012 02:15 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Eh? Other people have voiced concerns over that since waaay back in even
pre-D1 times. In particular, many people have argued for allowing
modules
with the same name as a
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:22:12 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 30/03/2012 14:13, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:10:14 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would expect this not to work, because bar isn't defined in module1
and template are
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 11:21:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
4. Blow in bottom of cartridge, even though the pins are clean
and free of dust (did this actually ever do anything?)
My hypothesis is it was actually the moisture that
made a better connection.
I'd like to test this now...
On 2012-03-30 14:07, deadalnix wrote:
all.d this the de facto standard here. I think it should become an
official guideline.
Why can't we get import foo.*;, then we don't have to relay on guidelines.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 12:10:32 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
For the ease of distribution, you can use a module with public
import in it.
There's still a few things I don't like though, about
downloading and compiling several modules.
When it is just one, you can download the single
file and
On 3/30/12 3:20 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
There has been a trend in Phobos of having some truly gigantic modules.
I believe this is indicative of a problem in the language. Andrei and I
have talked about it, and we think it is because of difficulties in
breaking a module up into submodules of a
Le 30/03/2012 16:24, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 3/30/12 3:20 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
There has been a trend in Phobos of having some truly gigantic modules.
I believe this is indicative of a problem in the language. Andrei and I
have talked about it, and we think it is because of
On 2012-03-30 16:17, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 12:10:32 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
For the ease of distribution, you can use a module with public import
in it.
There's still a few things I don't like though, about
downloading and compiling several modules.
When it is just
On 3/30/12 9:32 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 30/03/2012 16:24, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 3/30/12 3:20 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
There has been a trend in Phobos of having some truly gigantic modules.
I believe this is indicative of a problem in the language. Andrei and I
have talked about it,
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:39:09 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-03-30 14:52, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Why would there be ambiguities? Unlike C include files, D modules are
consistently compiled, unaffected by importing other modules.
What about static-if and string mixins?
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:48:04 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 30/03/2012 14:52, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:22:12 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Immagine you want to define your own to!xxx() for your type xxx. (It
is dumb case because you
On 3/29/2012 4:34 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But I realized after typing about 2 messages in response to this (and deleting
them), you are right, there is a fundamental problem here. Because the template
instantiation is based solely on the type. It does *not* include the type and
whatever
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:jl4d2e$24i1$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2012-03-30 14:07, deadalnix wrote:
all.d this the de facto standard here. I think it should become an
official guideline.
Why can't we get import foo.*;, then we don't have to relay on
guidelines.
The
On 3/30/2012 12:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:27:43 -0400, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
I would argue that:
3. An extension method for an argument of type template parameter T will be
looked up only in the instantiation scope.
I don't think
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:op.wbzdtbo0eav7ka@localhost.localdomain...
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:21:12 -0400, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jl3n59$qf7$1...@digitalmars.com...
Of course, I don't expect software to be
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:udpabjwyzxlollbiz...@forum.dlang.org...
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 11:21:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
4. Blow in bottom of cartridge, even though the pins are clean and free
of dust (did this actually ever do anything?)
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 21:03:21 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Problem is, it also corrodes the connectors.
Yea. But oh well, it can't be too bad... my old games
all still work!
Though, nowadays I tend to prefer the emulators. I have
a playstation controller on usb, which works for all
the
Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/30/2012 4:24 AM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
I think it's far superior to the explicit friend thing in C++.
Just curious. Did you take it from Delphi? :-)
No. I've never looked at Delphi in detail.
But in any case, for any language feature, there's
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ftnddrqdfbrtxiiwe...@forum.dlang.org...
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 21:03:21 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Problem is, it also corrodes the connectors.
Yea. But oh well, it can't be too bad... my old games
all still work!
Though,
Eeewww, I hate playing games on a PC:
- Too many other processes to screw up the experience.
Maybe if you were basing your experiences off of Windows 95.
- I spent sooo many hours every day *working* at the computer
desk, I
*don't* want to be be glued to it for my entertainment, too.
-
On 3/30/2012 12:36 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/30/2012 12:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:27:43 -0400, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
I would argue that:
3. An extension method for an argument of type template parameter T will be
looked up only
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 22:43:00 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Oh *definitely*. BTW, Wii homebrew is *fantastic* for that.
I don't have one of those thingys though.
But that would *never* happen under US-style IP law.
You know what's funny: I used to use an Atari ac adapter
for my Sega.
Bernard Helyer b.hel...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:jiioyfihtaqhpjafg...@forum.dlang.org...
Eeewww, I hate playing games on a PC:
- Too many other processes to screw up the experience.
Maybe if you were basing your experiences off of Windows 95.
Actually, it was pretty good back then,
Le 29/03/2012 02:21, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/rif9x/uniform_function_call_syntax_for_the_d/
Andrei
The example of std.algorithm should have been used. The importance of
such a syntax become obvious when using it.
On 03/29/2012 02:21 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/rif9x/uniform_function_call_syntax_for_the_d/
Andrei
I think the article does not mention that it also works for primitive types.
On 29/03/2012 01:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/rif9x/uniform_function_call_syntax_for_the_d/
Andrei
I do wish you guys would just post the direct link as well.
I hate reddit, I've zero interest in the comments on there and jumping
through that
Simon s.d.hamm...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:jl2j1u$1p3p$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 29/03/2012 01:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/rif9x/uniform_function_call_syntax_for_the_d/
Andrei
I do wish you guys would just post the direct link as
On 3/29/2012 3:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Yea, reddit *is* extremely slow whenever there's a reasonable number of
comments. And *that's* with JS *off* (and using it that way prevents you
from doing *anything* there other than read existing comments, which of
course is retarded). And then with
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:53:57 -0400, Jesse Phillips
jessekphillip...@gmail.com wrote:
I won't be going out of my way to check this, but there is a mention of
adding the range primatives. This works, but it doesn't make the class a
range for any other module, so std.algorithms won't
Timon Gehr:
I think the article does not mention that it also works for primitive types.
But there is a small problem with primitive properties:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7773
Bye,
bearophile
On 3/29/2012 4:34 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
One
misleading suggestion from the article however, it's not very easy to create
non-friend non-member functions using UFCS, considering that every function in a
given module is a friend. In order to do this, you would need a helper module
for
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:46:24 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/29/2012 4:34 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
One
misleading suggestion from the article however, it's not very easy to
create
non-friend non-member functions using UFCS, considering that every
On 3/29/2012 5:09 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The reason being, if you change anything in class A, you do not have to worry
about the implementation of getXSquared, because it simply has no access to the
private implementation. You only have to worry about internal methods, and
friend
On 3/29/2012 5:10 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Is anyone else's computer complaining about drdobbs having an invalid
certificate? I read the article, and then I wanted to reference it again, and I
got the error. Now I'm hesitant to accept the certificate because it seems to
come from a
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:27:46 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 3/29/2012 5:09 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The reason being, if you change anything in class A, you do not have to
worry
about the implementation of getXSquared, because it simply has no
access to
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
