On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 21:15:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[...]
Of note, dxml does not support the DTD section beyond what is
required to parse past it
[...]
- Jonathan M Davis
Fun fact, since the most common security vulnerability associated
with XML (XEE [1]) is based on
On 2018-02-10 19:57, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Kind of. I did some benchmarking to see if some code changes would improve
performance, but I haven't tried benchmarking it against any other XML
libraries.
Ok, I see.
That would take a fair bit of time and effort, and IMHO, that
would be better
On Sun, 2018-02-11 at 03:34 -0700, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
>
[…]
> Given how strings work in D, parsing is something that we should
> easily be
> able to do faster than other languages - or at least, other languages
> typically have to write much less idiomatic code
On Sunday, February 11, 2018 10:11:05 Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 13:47 -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-
>
> announce wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:15:33PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > > I have
On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 13:47 -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:15:33PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > I have multiple projects that need an XML parser, and
> > std_experimental_xml is clearly going nowhere, with the
On Saturday, February 10, 2018 21:10:28 Joakim via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Saturday, 10 February 2018 at 18:57:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 10, 2018 16:14:41 Jacob Carlborg via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d- announce wrote:
> >> On 2018-02-09 22:15, Jonathan M
On Saturday, 10 February 2018 at 18:57:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, February 10, 2018 16:14:41 Jacob Carlborg via
Digitalmars-d- announce wrote:
On 2018-02-09 22:15, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> [...]
This is great news! Have you run any benchmarks to see how it
performs?
Kind
On Saturday, February 10, 2018 19:53:48 Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 21:15:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Hopefully, the documentation is clear enough, but obviously,
> > I'm not the best judge of that. So, have at it.
> >
> >
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 21:15:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Hopefully, the documentation is clear enough, but obviously,
I'm not the best judge of that. So, have at it.
Documentation: http://jmdavisprog.com/docs/dxml/0.1.0/
Github: https://github.com/jmdavis/dxml
Dub:
On Saturday, February 10, 2018 10:27:42 Stefan via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> great work, Jonathan. Thank you.
> We were missing xml for a long time and did so many hacks just to
> get xml somehow parsed.
LOL. Actually, one of the helper functions in std.datetime.timezone that has
to deal
On Saturday, February 10, 2018 12:04:48 Seb via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 21:15:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > I have multiple projects that need an XML parser, and
> > std_experimental_xml is clearly going nowhere, with the guy who
> > wrote it having
On 2018-02-09 22:15, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Currently, dxml contains only a range-based StAX / pull parser and related
helper functions, but the plan is to add a DOM parser as well as two writers
- one which is the writer equivalent of a StaX parser, and one which is
DOM-based. However, in
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 21:15:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I have multiple projects that need an XML parser, and
std_experimental_xml is clearly going nowhere, with the guy who
wrote it having disappeared into the ether, so I decided to
break down and write one. I've kind of wanted to
great work, Jonathan. Thank you.
We were missing xml for a long time and did so many hacks just to
get xml somehow parsed.
On Friday, February 09, 2018 13:47:52 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> As for DTDs, perhaps it might be enough to make normalize() configurable
> with some way to specify additional entities that may be defined in the
> DTD? Once that's possible, I'd say it's Good Enough(tm), since
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 02:15:33PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> I have multiple projects that need an XML parser, and
> std_experimental_xml is clearly going nowhere, with the guy who wrote
> it having disappeared into the ether, so I decided to break down and
>
I have multiple projects that need an XML parser, and std_experimental_xml
is clearly going nowhere, with the guy who wrote it having disappeared into
the ether, so I decided to break down and write one. I've kind of wanted to
for years, but I didn't want to spend the time on it. However, sometime
17 matches
Mail list logo
