most programmer want use the language and a lot libraries that come with it.
instead of gui, db etc. you guys discuss until all prospective users are gone
off to use something that lets them do the job
maybe it is time to put a large effort into libraries by all the bright people
that are
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's
2009/11/10 Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:27:20 +0300, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote:
kprintf (a printf variant) in XoMB is a nice example imo. It accepts format
as a template parameter, doing all the checks at compile-time (and more).
On 11/11/09 17:58, grauzone wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Don wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles.
Inside the tested block of code, all sorts of things could go
wrong. You can't know if
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.337.1258023453.20261.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the response. More below.
However, the unescape() function used in traceVal looks like it might
be a useful CTFE example. Some kind of compile-time
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:hdgt9q$vt...@digitalmars.com...
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.337.1258023453.20261.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Hi Nick,
=== Compile-time checking on types with non-identifier strings ===
That is kinda
watching wrote:
most programmer want use the language and a lot libraries that come with it.
instead of gui, db etc. you guys discuss until all prospective users are gone
off to use something that lets them do the job
maybe it is time to put a large effort into libraries by all the bright
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Don wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside
the tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong. You
can't know if is(typeof(...)) really did what you wanted, or
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com
Bill Baxter wrote:
...
This is almost just a preprocessor macro trick, except for this line:
mixin( FoldStringsOf!visitMethodOf( [Sum, Product] ) );
The essence is to generate a bunch of methods from a list of names. I
was thinking to include a similar example from the world of 3d
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
watching wrote:
most programmer want use the language and a lot libraries that come
with it. instead of gui, db etc. you guys discuss until all
prospective users are gone off to use something that lets them do the job
maybe it is time to put a large effort into
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smart
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
watching wrote:
most programmer want use the language and a lot libraries that come
with it. instead of gui, db etc. you guys discuss until all
prospective users are gone off to use something that
Jeremie Pelletier wrote:
That's what I'm already doing, the STL and boost make it much easier to
do. I have string_t, wstring_t and dstring_t types derived from
std::basic_string to cover D strings, as well as ustring_t which is set
to the platform's native unicode encoding. I derived
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:34:31 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
I thought (I'm not 100% sure on either of these counts) that:
1. We don't want anything in Phobos that requires attribution for
works
distributed exclusively in binary form, even if the
Fixed url:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.052.zip
An update just to support Mac OSX 10.6. That also means the end of the
line for official support of 10.5 and earlier.
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.051.zip
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:hdim1s$30m...@digitalmars.com...
An update just to support Mac OSX 10.6. That also means the end of the
line for official support of 10.5 and earlier.
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.051.zip
I propose that the first person to
Anders Bergh wrote:
No, but you'll need to use the 10.4 SDK (it's optional when you
install Xcode though). Same problem as last time, between 10.4 and
10.5. But any binaries you compile for 10.4 should work on 10.6 as
well.
I did have the 10.4 SDK installed, but apparently the upgrade deleted
20 matches
Mail list logo
