On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:34:31 -0500, Walter Bright
<[email protected]> wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
I thought (I'm not 100% sure on either of these counts) that:
1. We don't want anything in Phobos that requires attribution for
works
distributed exclusively in binary form, even if the license is otherwise
permissive. This means we can't use BSD-licensed code in Phobos.
Right.
2. Creative commons isn't entirely clear about whether attribution
would be
required for stuff distributed in pure binary form.
Hmm. That would be a problem.
Binary form counts as a derivative work, so unless it's specifically
waived you have to included it.
