On Saturday, 27 July 2013 at 22:27:35 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
DScanner is a tool for analyzing D source code. It has the
following features:
* Prints out a complete AST of a source file in XML format.
* Syntax checks code and prints warning/error messages
* Prints a listing of modules
On Thursday, 25 July 2013 at 21:27:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/25/2013 11:49 AM, Dmitry S wrote:
I am also confused by the numbers. What I see at the end of
the article is
21.56 seconds, and the latest development version does it in
12.19, which is
really a 43% improvement. (Which is
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 11:46:05 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros
wrote:
This may be off topic, but here I go anyway...
Back in the school days, I joked that the Halting Problem is
actually
easy to solve with a Turing Machine. Since a Turing Machine is a
theoretical device that exists only in our
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 10:15:31 UTC, JS wrote:
On Thursday, 25 July 2013 at 21:27:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/25/2013 11:49 AM, Dmitry S wrote:
I am also confused by the numbers. What I see at the end of
the article is
21.56 seconds, and the latest development version does it in
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:35:59 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:17:22 UTC, JS wrote:
Even something like
for(;;)
{
if (random() == 3) break;
}
is decidable(it will halt after some time).
That program has a finite average runtime, but its maximum
runtime is
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:36:36 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:35:59 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:17:22 UTC, JS wrote:
Even something like
for(;;)
{
if (random() == 3) break;
}
is decidable(it will halt after some time).
That program has
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 13:05:10 UTC, JS wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:36:36 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:35:59 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:17:22 UTC, JS wrote:
Even something like
for(;;)
{
if (random() == 3) break;
}
is
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 14:39:02 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 13:05:10 UTC, JS wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:36:36 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:35:59 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:17:22 UTC, JS wrote:
Even
On 7/29/2013 5:28 AM, John Colvin wrote:
Seriously... Walter wouldn't have got his mechanical engineering degree if he
didn't know how to calculate a speed properly.
It's a grade school concept :-)
A college freshman physics problem would be calculating the delta V of a rocket
fired in space
On 7/29/2013 4:45 AM, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
Well, I kinda have the same feeling when using it. For my ~10kloc
project, I still haven't felt a real need to use a real build system.
I just dmd *.d. If any measurable time passes without any error
message appearing in the console, I know that
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:28:16 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 10:15:31 UTC, JS wrote:
On Thursday, 25 July 2013 at 21:27:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/25/2013 11:49 AM, Dmitry S wrote:
I am also confused by the numbers. What I see at the end of
the article is
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 18:34:16 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/29/2013 5:28 AM, John Colvin wrote:
Seriously... Walter wouldn't have got his mechanical
engineering degree if he
didn't know how to calculate a speed properly.
It's a grade school concept :-)
A college freshman physics
On 7/29/2013 12:08 PM, JS wrote:
Trying to use distance and speed as a measure of performance of a program is
just ridiculous.
If you google program execution speed you'll find it's a commonly used term.
Lines per second is a common measure of compiler execution speed - google
compiler lines
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 19:08:28 UTC, JS wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 12:28:16 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 10:15:31 UTC, JS wrote:
On Thursday, 25 July 2013 at 21:27:47 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 7/25/2013 11:49 AM, Dmitry S wrote:
I am also confused by the
On 07/29/2013 12:08 PM, JS wrote:
It seems some people have to go back to kindergarten and study
percentages!
Do you seriously think people who follow this forum need to relearn what
a percentage is? :)
(again, if we started with 12 second and went to 21 seconds, it would be
a near 75%
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 19:38:51 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/29/2013 12:08 PM, JS wrote:
Trying to use distance and speed as a measure of performance
of a program is
just ridiculous.
If you google program execution speed you'll find it's a
commonly used term. Lines per second is a
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 20:19:34 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 19:08:28 UTC, JS wrote:
Please study up on basic math before building any bridges. I
know computers have made everyone dumb
And again:
Honestly, I don't know why you are still trying... At this
On Monday, 29 July 2013 at 22:12:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/2013
The last one was a lot of fun, so I signed up for this one,
too. Note that Andrei is a speaker! Recommended. See y'all
there!
(P.S. It's entirely possible that I may get my
On 30 July 2013 08:12, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://channel9.msdn.com/**Events/GoingNative/2013http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/2013
The last one was a lot of fun, so I signed up for this one, too. Note that
Andrei is a speaker! Recommended. See y'all
On 7/29/2013 7:25 PM, Manu wrote:
On 30 July 2013 08:12, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
mailto:newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://channel9.msdn.com/__Events/GoingNative/2013
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/2013
The last one was a lot of fun, so I signed
20 matches
Mail list logo
