Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 at 05:23:34 UTC, ketmar wrote: On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 23:54:45 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: As in needs private members in __traits(allMembers). and in the end it just producing excessive noise in common loops that does `is(typeof(__traits(getMember, ...)))`.

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 23:54:45 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: As in needs private members in __traits(allMembers). and in the end it just producing excessive noise in common loops that does `is(typeof(__traits(getMember, ...)))`. it would be better to either leave that alone and allow all

Re: Joakim Intreviews Walter for the D Blog

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 19:44:19 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: Some of the links have pretty long text, is that intended? Yes. Joakim submitted the text with the links already formatted and I left them in place.

Re: The D Language Foundation is now a tax exempt non-profit organization

On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 17:03:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: We're happy to report that the D Language Foundation is now a public charity operating under US Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3). The decision is retroactive to September 23, 2015. This has wide-ranging implications,

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On 08/30/2016 04:54 PM, Martin Nowak wrote: > On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 23:08:58 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: >> On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 21:58:05 UTC, Basile B. wrote: >>> I'm a bit sad to see that >>> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15371 was completely ignored >>> to fix issue

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 23:08:58 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 21:58:05 UTC, Basile B. wrote: I'm a bit sad to see that https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15371 was completely ignored to fix issue 15907. Another decision could have been to break the

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 23:08:58 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 21:58:05 UTC, Basile B. wrote: I'm a bit sad to see that https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15371 was completely ignored to fix issue 15907. Another decision could have been to break the

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 21:58:05 UTC, Basile B. wrote: I'm a bit sad to see that https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15371 was completely ignored to fix issue 15907. Another decision could have been to break the visibility for the traits allMember, getMember, derivedMember and

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On 08/30/2016 02:58 PM, Basile B. wrote: On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 19:37:25 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Third beta for the 2.071.2 release. This beta fixes spurious deprecation warnings with templates using getMember (Issue 15907), please read the changelog for more details.

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 08:39:56 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: I just came up with a nifty little patch that makes it possible to ensure that a function is _only_ used at ctfe. Or the opposite. static assert(__ctfe, "This function is not supposed to be called outside of ctfe"); and static

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b3

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 19:37:25 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Third beta for the 2.071.2 release. This beta fixes spurious deprecation warnings with templates using getMember (Issue 15907), please read the changelog for more details. http://dlang.org/changelog/2.071.2.html

Re: Joakim Intreviews Walter for the D Blog

On 8/30/2016 4:50 AM, Mike Parker wrote: Joakim has put together an interview with Walter that's all about D. It's an enjoyable read. You can parse the interview at [1] and visit the reddit thread at [2]. I anticipate publishing more of Joakim's interviews on the blog in the future. [1]

Re: Joakim Intreviews Walter for the D Blog

On 2016-08-30 13:50, Mike Parker wrote: Joakim has put together an interview with Walter that's all about D. It's an enjoyable read. You can parse the interview at [1] and visit the reddit thread at [2]. I anticipate publishing more of Joakim's interviews on the blog in the future. [1]

Beta D 2.071.2-b3

Third beta for the 2.071.2 release. This beta fixes spurious deprecation warnings with templates using getMember (Issue 15907), please read the changelog for more details. http://dlang.org/changelog/2.071.2.html http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta Please report any bugs at

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 17:29:19 UTC, deadalnix wrote: worth trying to get it into master ? I would say maybe, but let's keep separate things separate. This is a language change. I would not include it in the same series of patch that change CTFE behavior. Yes. It would be confusing.

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 08:39:56 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote: On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 08:05:10 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via The work you are doing is just awesome! Many thanks. +1 your work is key for our success as a

Re: The D Language Foundation is now a tax exempt non-profit organization

On 08/30/2016 05:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > Unless we have a sort of branch in other countries, I don't see what we > can do here. -- Andrei EU branch of D foundation would be interesting but I think it is much premature to think about that :) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: The D Language Foundation is now a tax exempt non-profit organization

On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 10:25 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars- d-announce wrote: […] > Unless we have a sort of branch in other countries, I don't see what > we  > can do here. -- Andrei Understood, but without a solution it means no-one outside the USA can contribute and have the D

Re: Joakim Intreviews Walter for the D Blog

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 13:07:03 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote: Nice article. PS: "ABEL" link point to mobile version of wikipedia. Andrea Fixed, thanks!

Re: Joakim Intreviews Walter for the D Blog

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 13:37:34 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 11:50:52 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Joakim has put together an interview He did four (IIRC) of these for This Week in D too if you want more like that: Sönke Ludwig

Re: The D Language Foundation is now a tax exempt non-profit organization

On 08/30/2016 08:36 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: Andrei, This is splendid news for the purveying of the D Programming language. The question is though: this covers the USA what about the Rest of the World? For the language itself it is almost irrelevant where the owning

Re: The D Language Foundation is now a tax exempt non-profit organization

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 12:36:12 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: Andrei, This is splendid news for the purveying of the D Programming language.  The question is though: this covers the USA what about the Rest of the World? For Germany this would probably require a separate application to

Re: Joakim Intreviews Walter for the D Blog

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 11:50:52 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Joakim has put together an interview He did four (IIRC) of these for This Week in D too if you want more like that: Sönke Ludwig http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/mar-15.html Dmitry Olshansky

Re: Joakim Intreviews Walter for the D Blog

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 11:50:52 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: Joakim has put together an interview with Walter that's all about D. It's an enjoyable read. You can parse the interview at [1] and visit the reddit thread at [2]. I anticipate publishing more of Joakim's interviews on the blog in

Joakim Intreviews Walter for the D Blog

Joakim has put together an interview with Walter that's all about D. It's an enjoyable read. You can parse the interview at [1] and visit the reddit thread at [2]. I anticipate publishing more of Joakim's interviews on the blog in the future. [1]

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

Am Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:42:35 +0200 schrieb Johannes Pfau : > @nogc is only meaningful at runtime. So this could work: > > module foo; > @nogc: > [...] > > string ctfeOnly(string name) > { > static assert(!__ctfe); This should be static assert(__ctfe); of course.

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

Am Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:35:20 + schrieb Stefan Koch : > I do not see how this could affect @nogc. @nogc is only meaningful at runtime. So this could work: module foo; @nogc: [...] string ctfeOnly(string name) { static assert(!__ctfe); // error: cannot

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > [snip] > But yes you can circumvent the code-generation and pulling in the druntime > dependency using a static if. > That will be awesome!

Re: Beta D 2.071.2-b2

On Tuesday, 9 August 2016 at 15:37:27 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Second beta for the 2.071.2 release. This fixes Issue 15780, 16085, and 16348. More import/lookup fixes upcoming. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.071.2.html Please report any bugs at

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 08:18:47 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote: There are some nice use cases for this: * Do not enforce @nogc for CTFE only functions, so you can mark a complete module nogc: and CTFE only functions will get ignored * Do not emit code for CTFE only functions. This is

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

Am Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:57:25 +0200 schrieb Jacob Carlborg : > On 2016-08-29 10:39, Stefan Koch wrote: > > > Thanks guys. > > > > I just came up with a nifty little patch that makes it possible to > > ensure that a function is _only_ used at ctfe. > > Or the opposite. > > > > static

Re: Battle-plan for CTFE

On 2016-08-29 10:39, Stefan Koch wrote: Thanks guys. I just came up with a nifty little patch that makes it possible to ensure that a function is _only_ used at ctfe. Or the opposite. static assert(__ctfe, "This function is not supposed to be called outside of ctfe"); and static