Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Gour
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:08:02 +0300 Vladimir == vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote: Vladimir As you can see, in many places Git is the antithesis to the Vladimir Make correct and common things easy, make shooting yourself Vladimir in the foot hard principle. However, I don't think this is a

Re: [OTx2] Windows

2010-10-28 Thread Vladimir Panteleev
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:25:21 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote: A good analogy is writing software only for Linux, because the major OS is so horrible. For what it's worth, I never had any problems with my Windows install - the only time I reinstalled was when

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Russel Winder
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:02 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:42:32 +0300, Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 10:20 -0700, Bill Baxter wrote: I'm not a huge fan of Bazaar :-p , Hummm... May I ask why? Could someone please explain

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Russel Winder
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:56 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: [ . . . ] It's not really about Git, it's about GitHub: Actually, it is about your use model of GitHub. 1. Repo creation is instant, doesn't need to go through a human approval process, etc. (big turn-off from DSource,

Re: [OTx2] Windows

2010-10-28 Thread Nick Sabalausky
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message news:op.vk9y2yhztuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net... On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:25:21 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote: A good analogy is writing software only for Linux, because the major OS is so

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Gour
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:54:31 +0100 Russel == Russel Winder wrote: Russel Moving to any of Bazaar, Mercurial or Git would be a huge step Russel forward for any FOSS project currently using Subversion. +1 Russel Monotone and Darcs would be a big risk because Bazaar, Russel Mercurial and Git are

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Bruno Medeiros
On 27/10/2010 22:33, Jérôme M. Berger wrote: Well, Mercurial offers much less opportunities to shoot oneself in the foot and is much easier to use. This is especially true if you come from another VCS like SVN: you can use the same commands for the same results on the local repository

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:33:54 +0300, Jérôme M. Berger jeber...@free.fr wrote: The only true advantage that Git has over Mercurial is the staging area, and even that is a two edged sword: IMO it should not be enabled by default since it helps people to lose data.

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
Bruno Medeiros wrote: On 27/10/2010 22:33, Jérôme M. Berger wrote: Well, Mercurial offers much less opportunities to shoot oneself in the foot and is much easier to use. This is especially true if you come from another VCS like SVN: you can use the same commands for the same results on

Re: [OT] DVCS

2010-10-28 Thread Uno
git and gui? Come on... Have you seen this: http://www.syntevo.com/smartgit/index.html ?

Re: MinPSPW supports D

2010-10-28 Thread Nick Sabalausky
Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com wrote in message news:op.vlbmgmt2o7c...@korden-pc... On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:03:17 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote: Found this with google alert: http://dogoautilio.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/minpspw-0-9-10-is-out/ Andrei I