On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:08:02 +0300
Vladimir == vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
Vladimir As you can see, in many places Git is the antithesis to the
Vladimir Make correct and common things easy, make shooting yourself
Vladimir in the foot hard principle. However, I don't think this is a
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:25:21 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev
vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
A good analogy is writing software only for Linux, because the major OS
is so horrible.
For what it's worth, I never had any problems with my Windows install -
the only time I reinstalled was when
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:02 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:42:32 +0300, Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.uk
wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 10:20 -0700, Bill Baxter wrote:
I'm not a huge fan of Bazaar :-p ,
Hummm... May I ask why?
Could someone please explain
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:56 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
[ . . . ]
It's not really about Git, it's about GitHub:
Actually, it is about your use model of GitHub.
1. Repo creation is instant, doesn't need to go through a human approval
process, etc. (big turn-off from DSource,
Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote in message
news:op.vk9y2yhztuz...@cybershadow.mshome.net...
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:25:21 +0300, Vladimir Panteleev
vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
A good analogy is writing software only for Linux, because the major OS
is so
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:54:31 +0100
Russel == Russel Winder wrote:
Russel Moving to any of Bazaar, Mercurial or Git would be a huge step
Russel forward for any FOSS project currently using Subversion.
+1
Russel Monotone and Darcs would be a big risk because Bazaar,
Russel Mercurial and Git are
On 27/10/2010 22:33, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Well, Mercurial offers much less opportunities to shoot oneself in
the foot and is much easier to use. This is especially true if you
come from another VCS like SVN: you can use the same commands for
the same results on the local repository
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:33:54 +0300, Jérôme M. Berger jeber...@free.fr
wrote:
The only true advantage that Git has over Mercurial is the staging
area, and even that is a two edged sword: IMO it should not be
enabled by default since it helps people to lose data.
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 27/10/2010 22:33, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Well, Mercurial offers much less opportunities to shoot oneself in
the foot and is much easier to use. This is especially true if you
come from another VCS like SVN: you can use the same commands for
the same results on
git and gui? Come on...
Have you seen this: http://www.syntevo.com/smartgit/index.html ?
Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:op.vlbmgmt2o7c...@korden-pc...
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:03:17 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Found this with google alert:
http://dogoautilio.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/minpspw-0-9-10-is-out/
Andrei
I
11 matches
Mail list logo