Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 13:33:54 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Most of the rest (if not all of it) could indeed be done in a library.
I am not sure it could be done nicely too :-)
That would depend on what you're trying to do. Printing test success or
On 18-nov-10, at 09:11, Don wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 13:33:54 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Most of the rest (if not all of it) could indeed be done in a
library.
I am not sure it could be done nicely too :-)
That would depend on what you're trying
On 18-nov-10, at 01:49, klickverbot wrote:
On 11/18/10 1:12 AM, Bill Baxter wrote:
Nice work! Is it for D2 or D1? Or both?
--bb
I hope you don't mind me answering, Fawzi:
sure I don't mind, actually I hope more people will get involved :)
Currently, it's D1 only.
yes, indeed, I have
On 17/11/2010 21:27, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
But what exactly is that data corruption issue on Windows?
In some cases (I didn't try to isolate the precise conditions), Git
will replace '\n' with '\r\n' in binary files. This is with the
default config. It might be
On 16/11/2010 21:11, Gide Nwawudu wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:54:50 -0800, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 07:53:01 Sean Kelly wrote:
bearophile Wrote:
He also gives a quite useful unittest that the student implementation
must pass, this is a good
On Thursday 18 November 2010 04:47:43 Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 16/11/2010 21:11, Gide Nwawudu wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:54:50 -0800, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 07:53:01 Sean Kelly wrote:
bearophile Wrote:
He also gives a quite
On 11/18/10 8:20 PM, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Performance was actually horrendous on windows last year, not just
lower.
That's what you say.
I say that I've been happily using Git on Windows for over two years
without noticing any performance problems.
Now what?
klickverbot wrote:
On 11/18/10 8:18 PM, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
It deserves the label data corruption since Git did the
conversion when committing the file, which means that the version
stored in the history was corrupted.
Okay, so you I guess you were pretty unlucky since after you
klickverbot wrote:
On 11/18/10 8:20 PM, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Performance was actually horrendous on windows last year, not just
lower.
That's what you say.
I say that I've been happily using Git on Windows for over two years
without noticing any performance problems.
Now what?
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Well, I went back to the message I posted at the time (on June 6
2009 in digitalmars.D)
Sorry, that should read on June *3*. The thread subject was Re:
Source control for all dmd source (Git propaganda =) if you want to
look it up.
Jerome
On 11/17/2010 1:52 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
I'm announcing the release of DDT (D Development Tools) version 0.4.0:
http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/p/ddt/
(There was previously an older inactive project also called DDT, it has
been renamed to EclipseD, with the authors permission.)
For those interested in keeping up to date with the syntax highlighting file
for vim, I have decided to create a GitHub repository for it. Feel free to
submit bugs and patches.
https://github.com/he-the-great/d.vim
Also I have a thin wrapper to the Fuse 2.8 API on GitHub for D2. There are
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:42:49 +0100, Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
I am happy to announce blip 0.5
http://dsource.org/projects/blip
why 0.5? because it works for me, but hopefully it will work for others
too, and 1.0 will be a release with more contributors...
Blip is a library that offers
Russel Winder wrote:
...
What this email is really about though is to ask: where is the best
place to keep a permanent, i.e. not just on a mailing list, record of
all the D editor support stuff. As well as Emacs and Vim there must be
support for TextMate, Eclipse, NetBeans, IntelliJ IDEA, .
14 matches
Mail list logo
