The reason I use golang and not dlang for development at work is because
debugging is straightforward no weird segfaults after you program has been
running for a couple of days.
Their debugging and benchmark tools are really good and the documentation
is fantastic. I haven't used dlang for a while
On Saturday, 16 March 2013 at 14:42:58 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Hi folks! I had wrote small article about Rust vs D. I hope
that you will like it!
http://versusit.org/rust-vs-d
This can see the D language is very good, I like the D language
On 3/17/13 4:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/17/2013 8:58 AM, Suliman wrote:
Yesterday I had tried to put it reddit, but I have never used reddit
before and
do not sure that it was added at proper section.
reddit.com/r/programming is where it should go.
It was at:
http://www.reddit.com/r/
On Sunday, March 17, 2013 17:14:42 1100110 wrote:
> Soo... You're saying D is like Vim? =P
LOL. D's learning curve is nowhere near as steep as that. Almost nothing has a
learning curve as steep as vim...
But on some level, the concept is the same. In order for something to be
powerful enough
On 03/17/2013 04:05 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
Al 17/03/13 21:41, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 20:00 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote:
Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit:
[…]
I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am
not getting an update
On 03/17/2013 03:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/17/2013 3:06 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On the other hand "creeping featurism" can be a bad thing. Isn't the
mantra "small language, large (properly indexed) library"?
It can be a bad thing, no doubt about it. On the other hand:
When I was in Lo
Walter Bright wrote:
[snip]
I prefer to view D as a fully equipped machine shop with the right tools
for the right job. Yes, it will take longer to master it than a simpler
language. But we're professionals, we program all day.
Not everyone is. With its "scripting abilities" (fast compilatio
Am 17.03.2013 21:56, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 3/17/2013 3:01 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
I guess this is because of the segmented stacks architecture behind the
realization of Go.
Segmented stacks have a significant performance cost to them, as well as
making it hard to interface to other langua
Am 17.03.2013 20:28, schrieb 1100110:
On 03/17/2013 07:09 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On 17.03.2013 11:01, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 09:17 +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
The first known one is that Go is the only strong typed language to
eschew generics in the 21st century.
On the
Al 17/03/13 21:41, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit:
> On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 20:00 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote:
>> Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit:
> […]
>>> I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am
>>> not getting an update from the repository.
>>>
>>
>> Th
On 3/17/2013 3:01 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
I guess this is because of the segmented stacks architecture behind the
realization of Go.
Segmented stacks have a significant performance cost to them, as well as making
it hard to interface to other languages. I also think that the shift to 64 bits
On 3/17/2013 3:06 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On the other hand "creeping featurism" can be a bad thing. Isn't the
mantra "small language, large (properly indexed) library"?
It can be a bad thing, no doubt about it. On the other hand:
When I was in London for the 2010 ACCU (when the volcano stran
On 3/17/2013 8:58 AM, Suliman wrote:
Yesterday I had tried to put it reddit, but I have never used reddit before and
do not sure that it was added at proper section.
reddit.com/r/programming is where it should go.
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 20:00 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote:
> Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit:
[…]
> > I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am
> > not getting an update from the repository.
> >
>
> That's correct. There will be deb updates for every dub b
Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
> On Friday, 15 March 2013 at 21:18:09 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote:
> >Nice.
> >Can you make it compatible with Deimos
> >https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos/?
> >
> >Jens
>
> If by compatible you mean "can be used with":
>
> I don't see anything that would prevent you from
On 03/17/2013 07:09 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On 17.03.2013 11:01, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 09:17 +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
The first known one is that Go is the only strong typed language to
eschew generics in the 21st century.
On the other hand, perhaps generics is not a
Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit:
> On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 11:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote:
> […]
>> Can you test the new dub Debian packages please?
>>
>> https://code.google.com/p/d-apt/
>
> I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am
> not getting an upd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit:
> On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 11:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote:
> […]
>> Can you test the new dub Debian packages please?
>>
>> https://code.google.com/p/d-apt/
>
> I am guessing that the number of the package
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 11:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote:
[…]
> Can you test the new dub Debian packages please?
>
> https://code.google.com/p/d-apt/
I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am
not getting an update from the repository.
--
Russel.
On 3/17/13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> it should be handled correctly by dmd. If not, that is a bug.
It likely wasn't located at the beginning. Anyway the samples now seem
to be images.
On 3/17/13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> In fact, your replacement still uses
> signed types.
Hmm, I was expecting it to always be size_t. Apparently it's based on the range:
foreach (i; 0 .. int.max) { } // i is int
foreach (i; 0 .. size_t.max) { } // i is size_t
Well, we can put a 'size_t'
Yesterday I had tried to put it reddit, but I have never used
reddit before and do not sure that it was added at proper section.
On Saturday, 16 March 2013 at 14:40:58 UTC, D-ratiseur wrote:
new is overriden in TUObject because the purpose of the library
is to bypass the garbage collector and to bypass the GC you
have to override new and delete.(at least according to the
manual: articles,mem managment).
The documentat
Nice writeup. Could you please fix the code formatting?
Indentation is lost at least on Chrome and Firefox on OSX. Then
I'll be glad to post on reddit.
Andrei Alexandrescu, I redid it and put source code as files for
downloading till we will not fix or bbcode parser. You may check.
I would th
Hi everyone,
Just wanted to announce a further bug fix release.
Nothing *so* important except that it now alters the AST e.g.
when you're at the end of a method body and pressing ,
it'll increase the body's endlocation which lets the completion
work fine until the complete file gets reparsed aft
On 17.03.2013 11:01, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 09:17 +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
The first known one is that Go is the only strong typed language to
eschew generics in the 21st century.
On the other hand, perhaps generics is not a good thing, yet has created
an unchallenged
On Sunday, 17 March 2013 at 08:57:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd like to add that D has:
- operator overloading
- user defined attributes
- dll's (coming soon)
So it doesn't.
- vector operations
- SIMD operations
- scope guard
- compile time function execution
- true immutability and purit
Al 17/03/13 08:54, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit:
> On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 07:52 +, Russel Winder wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 13:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote:
>>> Al 10/03/13 12:57, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit:
Any chance of working with Jordi to get Debian packages into d-apt?
>>
I've created new dub Debian packages and upload them at:
https://code.google.com/p/d-apt/
Test and comments are welcome.
--
Jordi Sayol
17-Mar-2013 14:06, Russel Winder пишет:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 01:57 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
I'd like to add that D has:
- operator overloading
- user defined attributes
- dll's (coming soon)
- vector operations
- SIMD operations
- scope guard
- compile time function execution
- true imm
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 01:57 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
> I'd like to add that D has:
>
> - operator overloading
> - user defined attributes
> - dll's (coming soon)
> - vector operations
> - SIMD operations
> - scope guard
> - compile time function execution
> - true immutability and purity
>
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 09:17 +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
> The first known one is that Go is the only strong typed language to
> eschew generics in the 21st century.
On the other hand, perhaps generics is not a good thing, yet has created
an unchallenged mindset? NB I am tainted by C++ templates
On Saturday, 9 March 2013 at 13:48:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for dub. Really helps a lot.
On 3/17/2013 1:17 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On 17.03.2013 09:05, Russel Winder wrote:
So what are the features that Go is ignoring that D has?
- exceptions;
- enumerations;
- generic types;
- direct use of OS APIs, without the need of writing wrappers;
- currently only static compilation is availa
On 17.03.2013 09:05, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 08:59 +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
However the Go guys just don't agree with the progresses made in
language abstractions in the last decades, which in my view is a plus
point for D and Rust, and made me stop caring about Go.
[…]
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 08:59 +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
> However the Go guys just don't agree with the progresses made in
> language abstractions in the last decades, which in my view is a plus
> point for D and Rust, and made me stop caring about Go.
[…]
So what are the features that Go is i
On 17.03.2013 07:25, Rob T wrote:
On Saturday, 16 March 2013 at 14:42:58 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Hi folks! I had wrote small article about Rust vs D. I hope that you
will like it!
http://versusit.org/rust-vs-d
I agree, only Rust seems to compete with D for the goal as being a real
alternative to
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 07:52 +, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 13:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote:
> > Al 10/03/13 12:57, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit:
> > > Any chance of working with Jordi to get Debian packages into d-apt?
> > >
> >
> > I'll create DUB deb packages soon.
> >
>
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 13:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote:
> Al 10/03/13 12:57, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit:
> > Any chance of working with Jordi to get Debian packages into d-apt?
> >
>
> I'll create DUB deb packages soon.
>
Sorted. Thanks.
--
Russel.
===
On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 21:06 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 3/16/13 10:42 AM, Suliman wrote:
> > Hi folks! I had wrote small article about Rust vs D. I hope that you
> > will like it!
> >
> > http://versusit.org/rust-vs-d
>
> Nice writeup. Could you please fix the code formatting? Indentati
40 matches
Mail list logo
