On Wednesday, 4 March 2015 at 22:08:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/3/2015 1:15 PM, notna wrote:
not sure if someone should inform them about the DMD name
clash... or just enjoy
the popularity ;)
http://www.gnu.org/software/dmd
I sent them a note.
I'd suggest Daemon Hurder or dhurd.
On Thursday, 5 March 2015 at 09:02:25 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Since using Go and working on a couple of fairly old C++
codebases,
all of which use tab for indent, I have come to rather like it.
You probably feel that way because tabs are better. dfmt only
defaults to spaces because that's
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 08:17 +0100, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
On 2015-03-04 16:26, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
There ought to be for the compiler/formatter toolchain otherwise
there will be problems. And if there is a D parser as library and
it
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 21:22 +, Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
[…]
That means that the Emacs plugin needs to start it automatically.
Is this something on your todo list, or do you need a pull request?
Implementing a separate parser based on the language spec has
It was very cool from the very beginning but when all new ref
counting discussions happened and I didn't have time to follow -
that was the moment of true appreciation of This Week in D.
Thank you, Adam.
Jacob Carlborg wrote in message news:md8vu6$hc1$1...@digitalmars.com...
The DMD front end is not really designed to be used as a library for
tooling.
It isn't, but it's slowly getting better. eg You can now build the lexer as
a library without pulling everything else in. It's quite
