Re: Release D 2.069.0

2015-11-09 Thread Dragos Carp via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 12:28:09 UTC, FreeSlave wrote: I tried to install rpm-package on Fedora 20 with rpm -i, but it gives me error: Failed dependencies: glibc-devel(x86-32) is needed by dmd-2.069.0-0.x86_64 libcurl(x86-32) is needed by dmd-2.069.0-0.x86_64 Why do

Re: 2.069.0 Installation problem with .exe for Windows

2015-11-09 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 11/09/2015 09:46 AM, Mike James wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > I've tried the new install with Windows Vista and Windows 7 and the > problem is the same as before. > > Regards, > -=mike=- Can you try again, I updated the installer and tried to revert the other part of the change (though I don't

Re: Release D 2.069.0

2015-11-09 Thread Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 21:38:13 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On 11/09/2015 07:08 PM, Dicebot wrote: More common practice is to declare such dependencies as optional though. I made a ticket https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15308. Simply changing

Re: Release D 2.069.0

2015-11-09 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 11/09/2015 07:08 PM, Dicebot wrote: > More common practice is to declare such dependencies as optional though. I made a ticket https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15308. Simply changing

Re: Release D 2.069.0

2015-11-09 Thread Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 10:39:21 UTC, Thomas Brix Larsen wrote: Opt-in stats from Arch: https://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics go 19.45% rust5.92% gcc-go 5.61% dmd 2.56% ldc 1.72% gdc 1.60% This matches my personal understanding of current "market" share

Re: Release D 2.069.0

2015-11-09 Thread Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 12:58:39 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote: On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 12:28:09 UTC, FreeSlave wrote: I tried to install rpm-package on Fedora 20 with rpm -i, but it gives me error: Failed dependencies: glibc-devel(x86-32) is needed by dmd-2.069.0-0.x86_64

Martin's article on reddit

2015-11-09 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
Discuss away: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3s5f92/writing_a_vibed_app_linking_bugzilla_issues_with/ -- Andrei

Re: Martin's article on reddit

2015-11-09 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 11/09/2015 12:00 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Discuss away: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3s5f92/writing_a_vibed_app_linking_bugzilla_issues_with/ -- Andrei Spread it to other outlets: https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/663764019812036608

Sciter Bootstrap for making HTML based desktop apps in D (e.g: CEF for D)

2015-11-09 Thread Ramon via Digitalmars-d-announce
http://misoftware.rs/Bootstrap Sciter is multiplatform HTML rendering engine for desktop (it also supports scripting and a bunch of CSS3 modules). Sciter Bootstrap let's you download a pre-made IDE project with everything setup for compiling a Sciter-based app, so you just add the HTML code

Re: Release D 2.069.0

2015-11-09 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 09:19:11 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote: Yes, use asModule() for that [1]. Not only does it enable using large grammars, it also saves compilation time for builds after the grammar has stabilised. Thanks. And should the grammar still be too large, it is good to know

Re: Release D 2.069.0

2015-11-09 Thread Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 14:37:32 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: You mean instead of mixin(grammer(`...`)) I write the output of grammer(`...`) to a file and include that into the final build? Yes, use asModule() for that [1]. Not only does it enable using large grammars, it also saves

Re: Release D 2.069.0

2015-11-09 Thread Thomas Brix Larsen via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 03:15:29 UTC, rsw0x wrote: On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 02:15:17 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/8/15 2:58 PM, rsw0x wrote: Interestingly, GDC seems *very* popular - it has a 4:1 install rate of gccgo and only trailing slightly behind the golang-go

Re: 2.069.0 Installation problem with .exe for Windows

2015-11-09 Thread Mike James via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 23:33:31 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: On 11/04/2015 10:05 AM, Mike James wrote: Copied here for extra visibility... Hi. There seems to be an install problem with the .exe version for Windows. The installer removes the old DMD then doesn't install the 2.069.0