On 2016-01-12 01:54, Martin Nowak wrote:
Makes sense https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dub/issues/747.
The compiler does check assertions in unittest blocks even in release
builds, right?
Yes, just verified. Actually, it doesn't matter where the assertion is
placed, as long as
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 03:13:22 UTC, Bubbasaur wrote:
It will be recorded or live?
Bubba.
The last 2 years there was a live stream and recording.
Regards,
Kai
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 08:12:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Yes, just verified. Actually, it doesn't matter where the
assertion is placed, as long as -unittest is passed.
Another surprise.
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 21:10:28 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
When you want to have control over the process of loading a
library e.g. if you want it to be an optional dependency at
runtime.
I've seen the example in the book. I'm just not sure why you
would want an optional runtime
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 20:32:57 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I'm not sure when you would want to use dynamic bindings.
When you want to have control over the process of loading a
library e.g. if you want it to be an optional dependency at
runtime.
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 22:00:32 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 21:10:28 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
When you want to have control over the process of loading a
library e.g. if you want it to be an optional dependency at
runtime.
I've seen the example in the book. I'm
On Sunday, 27 December 2015 at 17:21:24 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Thanks guys! That kind of feedback is a good Christmas present
:)
I'm working through the book now. I'm liking it.
I'm on Chapter 9, which has the Connecting D with C material. At
the beginning of the chapter you define some
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 21:10:28 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 20:32:57 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I'm not sure when you would want to use dynamic bindings.
When you want to have control over the process of loading a
library e.g. if you want it to be an optional
