On Monday, 14 May 2018 at 18:31:13 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2018-05-13 20:12, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce the first beta
for LDC 1.10. The highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.080.0.
* Supports DragonFly BSD.
* Some
On Monday, 14 May 2018 at 17:22:11 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
Be sure to post it in r/programming
This sort of community-centric post doesn't belong there. We have
to be careful not to reinforce the perception that we're spamming
the sub.
See [1]. with mostly (since v0.9.4) two possible `RangeError`
fixed, completion on the `IfCondition` variables [2] (which was
surprisingly not at all implemented), and freeze fixed on the
windows version (32 bit OMF), which forced to build with an older
DMD version.
All binaries are
On Monday, 14 May 2018 at 18:31:13 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Out of curiosity, how come the Objective-C integration seem to
always lack behind when LDC merges a new DMD release with some
new Objective-C integration? Is it less prioritized, not so
much knowledge in this area, something else?
On 15/05/2018 5:22 AM, 12345swordy wrote:
On Monday, 14 May 2018 at 15:23:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I planned an extended vacation with my wife around DConf this year
and, despite my intentions before we left, fell quite far behind on my
D duties. I'm in the process of getting caught up with
On Monday, 14 May 2018 at 15:23:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I planned an extended vacation with my wife around DConf this
year and, despite my intentions before we left, fell quite far
behind on my D duties. I'm in the process of getting caught up
with everything, and that includes publishing
I planned an extended vacation with my wife around DConf this
year and, despite my intentions before we left, fell quite far
behind on my D duties. I'm in the process of getting caught up
with everything, and that includes publishing the results of the
first round of the #dbugfix campaign.
On Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 23:22:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
However, I am struggling to find a use case for this that
showcases why you would want to use it. While it does work, and
works beautifully, it doesn't show any measurable difference
vs. the array allocated buffer that
On 5/14/18 6:02 AM, bioinfornatics wrote:
On Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 23:22:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
OK, so at dconf I spoke with a few very smart guys about how I can use
mmap to make a zero-copy buffer. And I implemented this on the plane
ride home.
However, I am struggling to
On Sun, 2018-05-13 at 12:05 -0600, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
[…]
>
> Really? If the consensus is that it should go in, then okay, but I don't
> think that I've ever seen a standard library with anything like
> functionality for talking to serial ports. And what would
On Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 23:22:02 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
OK, so at dconf I spoke with a few very smart guys about how I
can use mmap to make a zero-copy buffer. And I implemented this
on the plane ride home.
However, I am struggling to find a use case for this that
showcases why
On Sunday, 13 May 2018 at 18:12:51 UTC, kinke wrote:
Hi everyone,
on behalf of the LDC team, I'm glad to announce the first beta
for LDC 1.10. The highlights of this version in a nutshell:
* Based on D 2.080.0.
* Supports DragonFly BSD.
* Some fixes, most notably wrt. exception stack traces
12 matches
Mail list logo
