Re: GitHub could be acquired by Microsoft

On 06/09/2018 08:29 PM, bauss wrote: On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 23:41:43 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote: (I just hope it doesn't lead to GitLab running out of cash too.) And then Microsoft acquires both and everyone moves to Bitbucket. Endless cycle :) Ahhh! Time to make my own

Re: GitHub could be acquired by Microsoft

On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 23:41:43 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote: (I just hope it doesn't lead to GitLab running out of cash too.) And then Microsoft acquires both and everyone moves to Bitbucket. Endless cycle :)

Re: GitHub could be acquired by Microsoft

On 06/09/2018 11:06 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: [1] https://about.gitlab.com/2018/06/05/gitlab-ultimate-and-gold-free-for-education-and-open-source/ From the link: "It has been a crazy 24 hours for GitLab. More than 2,000 people tweeted about #movingtogitlab. We imported over 100,000

dlangbot for Telegram - D compiler in your pocket

Hello, I am glad to announce that new Telegram bot which can execute D code is up and running! Check it out here: https://t.me/dlangbot Features: - Two compilers to choose from: dmd (default) and ldc - Support for custom compiler arguments with `/args` command - It's possible to set

Diamond (Full-stack MVC web-framework) - v2.10.0 (GDPR Patch)

Happy to announce version 2.10.0 of Diamond. This release is primarily a GDPR Security Patch with respect for privacy during logging, sensitive data detection/validation etc. Of course as with everything else in Diamond it can be tweaked as much as you want, or disabled. Since last

Re: GitHub could be acquired by Microsoft

On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 07:53:13 UTC, drug wrote: 04.06.2018 09:02, Anton Fediushin пишет: On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 04:40:44 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On the bright side, maybe this will encourage online repo hosting to become less of a monopoly as folks move elsewhere due to their

Re: SecureD moving to GitLab

On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 08:35:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: The real problem is when employers try to claim anything unrelated to your job that you do in your free time. _That_ is completely inappropriate, but some employers try anyway, and depending on which state you live in and what

Re: SecureD moving to GitLab

On Sat, 2018-06-09 at 04:03 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via Digitalmars- d-announce wrote: > […] > Maybe naive, maybe not, but my policy is that: Any hour of any day an > employer claims ***ANY*** influence over, must be paid for ($$$) by said > employer when attempting to make ANY claim

Re: SecureD moving to GitLab

On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 22:47 -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > […] > Oh, employers do try that. I would negotiate what is mine and what is the > company's, before signing. In particular, I'd disclose all projects I'd > worked > on before, and get a specific acknowledgement

Re: SecureD moving to GitLab

On 09/06/2018 9:57 PM, Walter Bright wrote: On 6/9/2018 1:03 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote: Maybe naive, maybe not, but my policy is that: Any hour of any day an employer claims ***ANY*** influence over, must be paid for ($$$) by said employer when attempting to make ANY claim on that

Re: SecureD moving to GitLab

On 6/9/2018 1:03 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote: Maybe naive, maybe not, but my policy is that: Any hour of any day an employer claims ***ANY*** influence over, must be paid for ($$$) by said employer when attempting to make ANY claim on that hour of my life. Period. If that's the deal

Re: GitHub could be acquired by Microsoft

On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 15:06 -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > On 6/8/2018 3:02 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: > > Essentially (if not actually) everything on github is available through > > their > > api's. No need for scraping or other heroics to gather it. > > That's good to

Re: Beta 2.080.1

On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 16:28 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d- announce wrote: […] > > If not 2.080.2, I will target master for 2.081. Seems like it was pretty > much good to go, but didn't make the cutoff. I'll just go do some more Rust stuff whilst waiting. :-) -- Russel.

Re: SecureD moving to GitLab

On Saturday, June 09, 2018 04:03:40 Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d- announce wrote: > On 06/09/2018 01:47 AM, Walter Bright wrote: > > Oh, employers do try that. I would negotiate what is mine and what is > > the company's, before signing. In particular, I'd disclose all projects > > I'd

Re: GitHub could be acquired by Microsoft

On 06/09/2018 03:56 AM, Kagamin wrote: On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 07:06:23 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote: Whether web API or web scraping: Either way, you still have to submit an HTTP request, parse the results according to the format the server has chosen to spit out, and possibly

Re: SecureD moving to GitLab

On 06/09/2018 01:47 AM, Walter Bright wrote: Oh, employers do try that. I would negotiate what is mine and what is the company's, before signing. In particular, I'd disclose all projects I'd worked on before, and get a specific acknowledgement that those were not the company's. When I'd

Re: GitHub could be acquired by Microsoft

On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 07:06:23 UTC, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote: Whether web API or web scraping: Either way, you still have to submit an HTTP request, parse the results according to the format the server has chosen to spit out, and possibly follow up with additional HTTP requests.

Re: GitHub could be acquired by Microsoft

On 06/08/2018 06:02 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: Essentially (if not actually) everything on github is available through their api's.  No need for scraping or other heroics to gather it. That does make things a little bit simpler, but web scraping really isn't all that much more complicated.