Re: Beta 2.094.0
On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 13:35:34 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote: On 2020-09-17 12:10, John Colvin wrote: I personally think it's not so bad as long as the commit gets written to the dub.selections.json It doesn't. I know. But it should be. But then again a lot of things “should be” with dub.
Re: Release Candidate 2.094.0 [was: Re: Beta 2.094.0]
On 9/18/20 1:16 PM, Martin Nowak wrote: On Friday, 11 September 2020 at 07:48:00 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.094.0 release, ♥ to the 49 contributors. The release candidate is live now. This is the first release to be built with LDC on all platforms, so we'd welcome some more thorough beta testing. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.094.0.html As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org This revert of the __traits(allMembers) change for imports is not included in this release candidate. https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/11739 It needs to be included before the release, so that the import changes can be deferred until the next major. -Steve
Release Candidate 2.094.0 [was: Re: Beta 2.094.0]
On Friday, 11 September 2020 at 07:48:00 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote: Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.094.0 release, ♥ to the 49 contributors. The release candidate is live now. This is the first release to be built with LDC on all platforms, so we'd welcome some more thorough beta testing. http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta http://dlang.org/changelog/2.094.0.html As usual please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org -Martin
Re: DIP 1030-- Named Arguments--Formal Assessment
On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 13:39:14 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: It's from a phone call they had while they were discussing whether to approve or reject the DIP. LOL no wonder I couldn't find it.
Re: DIP 1030-- Named Arguments--Formal Assessment
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
Good. It has some weaknesses that Rikki's DIP would have avoided
but it's also simpler. Good work, Walter!
"Named arguments breaks this very important pattern:
auto wrapper(alias origFun)(Parameters!origFun args)
{
// special sauce
return origFun(args);
}"
I'm not worried about this one, as AFAIK this does not really
break, it just needs changes to work with the new feature.
Re: DIP 1030-- Named Arguments--Formal Assessment
On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 13:34:30 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy wrote: On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: So they decided that a new `std.traits` template and a corresponding `__traits` option are needed which expand into the exact function signature of another function. I have been trying to locate that specific discussion, without success so far. Help? This is of great interest to me, and I may throw in my $.02. It's from a phone call they had while they were discussing whether to approve or reject the DIP.
Re: Beta 2.094.0
On 2020-09-17 12:10, John Colvin wrote: I personally think it's not so bad as long as the commit gets written to the dub.selections.json It doesn't. -- /Jacob Carlborg
Re: DIP 1030-- Named Arguments--Formal Assessment
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: So they decided that a new `std.traits` template and a corresponding `__traits` option are needed which expand into the exact function signature of another function. I have been trying to locate that specific discussion, without success so far. Help? This is of great interest to me, and I may throw in my $.02.
