On Wednesday, 2 June 2021 at 11:10:36 UTC, Dukc wrote:
Phobos v2 is an official plan? That was news for me! Any chance
to get a glimpse of what's planned for it?
The overall goal is that it doesn't replace the current Phobos,
but sits alongside it. Changed/improved/new functionality goes in
Dylan Graham writes about his experience using D in a
microcontroller project and why he chose it. Does anyone know of
any similar projects using D? I don't. This may well be the first
time it's been employed in this specific manner.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/06/01/driving-with-d/
I have just handed off DIP 1038, "@nodiscard", to Walter and
Atila for their final verdict. They will have 30 days to reach a
decision, ask for changes, or otherwise inform us of the status
of the DIP.
You can read the current revision here:
On Friday, 28 May 2021 at 14:56:08 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
We've just completed our monthly meeting for the month of May
2021. One decision we made is to start providing summaries of
the topics discussed. Hence this forum post.
The participants: Walter, Atila, Andrei, Razvan, Max, and me.
We've just completed our monthly meeting for the month of May
2021. One decision we made is to start providing summaries of the
topics discussed. Hence this forum post.
The participants: Walter, Atila, Andrei, Razvan, Max, and me.
### Goals & Tasks
The primary topic on our agenda for this
The authors of DIP 1036, "String Interpolation Tuple Literals",
have chosen to withdraw it from consideration in deference to an
alternative proposal currently being drafted here:
https://github.com/John-Colvin/YAIDIP
From the DIP review process documentation:
Unlike Abandoned DIPs, a
On Tuesday, 25 May 2021 at 00:58:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/24/21 8:38 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
OK, I'm just concerned people will see the pattern:
```d
somecfunc(str.toStringz);
```
and think that's the end of it.
Yeah. Good point. I've updated the post.
On Monday, 24 May 2021 at 16:16:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Nice article!
Thanks!
Note that there is a huge pitfall awaiting you if you use
`toStringz`: garbage collection. You may want to amend the
article to identify this pitfall.
And I'm not talking about requiring
On Monday, 24 May 2021 at 15:10:46 UTC, sighoya wrote:
There are at least two more posts worth of information to go
into on this topic, but everything in this post is enough to
cover many use cases of D to C string interop.
Which posts did you think of?
I describe them in the Conclusion:
On Monday, 24 May 2021 at 15:03:20 UTC, zjh wrote:
I always think there is something wrong with the JS of ` D blog
site`.
I can't use chrome to open it.
I'm looking at it in Chrome right now. Are you saying it doesn't
open at all for you or there are rendering issues, or...?
The latest post in the D and C series dives into the weeds of D
and C strings: how they're implemented, when you need to
NUL-terminate your D strings and when you don't, and how the
storage of literals in memory allows you to avoid NUL termination
in one case you might not have considered and
Razvan Nitu, one of the foundation's two Pull Request Managers
funded by Symmetry Investments, talks about the work he's been
doing and two initiatives intended to motivate contributions to
the core D projects.
https://dlang.org/blog/2021/05/18/a-pull-request-managers-perspective/
I've also
This news round-up serves as the "public-facing" announcement of
the latest D release, a hint at the upcoming LDC beta, and word
on GDC progress. I've also included the formal announcement of
the SAOC 2020 results, and a reminder about a couple of Github
repositories where anyone looking to
On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 12:27:56 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
Just implementation deficiency. I think it is fixable with some
refactoring of the GC pipeline. One approach would be, (similar
to other language implementations - see below), that
GC-allocated objects with
On Thursday, 18 March 2021 at 08:15:01 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
In the mean time a good rule of thumb is to qualify all class
destructors as @nogc. I suggest you add this advice to the
article, Mike.
I actually don't agree with that. I'll be discussion the solution
in the next article:
Some of you will have already heard that we didn't make it into
GSoC 2021. Every year Google receives over 500 organization
applications, but they can only accept ~200. I have no insights
into their decision process, but I do believe our application was
stronger this year than it was when we
Some of you will have already heard that we didn't make it into
GSoC 2021. Every year Google receives over 500 organization
applications, but they can only accept ~200. I have no insights
into their decision process, but I do believe our application was
stronger this year than it was when we
The first round of Community Review for DIP 1040, "Copying,
Moving, and Forwarding", is now underway. Please discuss the DIP
(its merits, its implementation, peripheral topics, etc.) in the
Discussion Thread and save all review feedback (critiques on the
content of the DIP: what to change, how
On Thursday, 4 March 2021 at 23:42:58 UTC, Dukc wrote:
I don't understand this part. If an assert was failing, the
program is going to terminate anyway, so
InvalidMemoryOperationError is no problem. Well, it might
obfuscate the underlying error if there is no stack trace, but
banning
This post is 3+ years overdue. I initially put it off for the
lack of a purpose-built tool in the language or the library to
distinguish between normal destruction and finalization (when the
GC is invoked by the destructor). After we got the
`GC.inFinalizer` thing and having made a few stalled
On Thursday, 25 February 2021 at 19:28:43 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Friday, 19 February 2021 at 08:28:01 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
GitHub:
https://github.com/BindBC/bindbc-lua/releases/tag/0.4.0
The link doesn't work because the tag lacks a 'v', should be:
The second round of Community Review for DIP 1036, "String
Interpolation Tuple Literals", is now underway. Please discuss
the DIP (its merits, its implementation, peripheral topics, etc.)
in the Discussion Thread and save all review feedback (critiques
on the content of the DIP: what to
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 04:31:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
Would you like to know more?
http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2021_02_15.html
It's on /r/programming here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/lnhuts/anonymous_classes_in_d/
In the latest release of binbc-lua, I've added support for Lua
5.4.
In recognition of the upcoming named argument support, I've
decided to add parameter names to all of the C API function
declarations in the BindBC packages. bindbc-lua 0.4.0 now has
them, even for the function pointers in
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 at 07:07:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Congratulations to Dennis Korpel for a job well done, and
thanks to everyone who provided feedback on this DIP from the
Draft Review through to the Final Review.
And here's the link:
When I emailed Walter and Atila to officially launch the Formal
Assessment of DIP 1034, "Add a Bottom Type (reboot)", I expected
it would be three or four weeks before I received their final
decision. So I was surprised when Walter replied two days later
with the following response:
On Sunday, 14 February 2021 at 00:54:41 UTC, superbomba wrote:
On Saturday, 13 February 2021 at 20:48:53 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
...
Is it possible to rebroadcast live with YT for those who can't
access the original site or app?
What would be the point of that? You'd be unable
The final Milestone for SAOC 2020 Ended on January 15. The two
remaining students, Robert Aron and Adela Vais, had until the end
of the month to submit their final reports. They did so, and the
reports are now in the hands of the SAOC Committee, which this
year consists of Atila Neves, John
The Final Review for DIP 1038, "@nodiscard", has begun.
The Final Review is the last check to make sure everything is in
good shape. Generally, we aren't looking for major revisions to
the DIP unless someone notices something critical. This is a
chance for any revisions made in the previous
After a bit of delay, DIP 1034, "Add a Bottom Type (reboot)", is
now in the hands of Walter and Atila for the Formal Assessment.
We can expect to have a final decision or some other result by
March 4.
You can find the final draft of DIP 1034 here:
On Wednesday, 27 January 2021 at 11:14:13 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
Corrected links:
Thanks. I had too many tabs open.
The second round of Community Review for DIP 1036, "String
Interpolation Tuple Literals", is now under way. Please discuss
the DIP (its merits, its implementation, peripheral topics, etc.)
in the Discussion Thread and save all review feedback (critiques
on the content of the DIP: what to
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 09:49:10 UTC, M.M. wrote:
Is this (and the related PR people) a short-term initiative, or
is the funding secured for a longer period?
As far as I know this is long term.
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 13:08:58 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 09:32:06 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
(Also, general question:
Will the PR guys and Max be on Discord or Slack or will it be
too much for them?)
That's up to them, but I guess Max probably will be.
On Monday, 18 January 2021 at 09:32:06 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
(Also, general question:
Will the PR guys and Max be on Discord or Slack or will it be
too much for them?)
That's up to them, but I guess Max probably will be.
Thanks once more to Symmetry Investments, we have a new paid
staffer in the D Language Foundation family.
Though I call him my "assistant", I can already see he will be
more than that. He'll be taking some things off my shoulders,
sure, but he also has ideas of his own to bring into the mix.
I'm very, very happy that I can finally announce the news. Some
of you may recall the job announcements I put out on the blog
back in September [1]. Symmetry Investments offered to fund one
full-time, or two part-time, Pull Request Manager positions, the
goal being to improve the efficiency of
On Saturday, 2 January 2021 at 20:15:16 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.095.0, ♥ to the 61 contributors.
This release comes with a much improved C++ header generation,
template instantiation traces for deprecations, module-level
function conflict detection, and better compiler
On Thursday, 7 January 2021 at 21:26:28 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Should this be on the announce forum?
No it shouldn't. But by the time I realized it was, the
discussion was well underway.
On Thursday, 7 January 2021 at 21:42:55 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 at 09:21:53 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/c06ce7f144b3dabf363d1896ddcd31a2a6b7c969/DIPs/DIP1039.md
A bit off topic: Would Kenji Hara still have been an active
Dlang
The first round of Community Review for DIP 1039, "Static Arrays
with Inferred Length", is now under way. Please discuss the DIP
(its merits, its implementation, peripheral topics, etc.) in the
Discussion Thread and save all review feedback (critiques on the
content of the DIP: what to change,
This is the discussion thread for the first round of Community
Review of DIP 1039, "Static Arrays with Inferred Length":
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/c06ce7f144b3dabf363d1896ddcd31a2a6b7c969/DIPs/DIP1039.md
The review period will end at 11:59 PM ET on January 20, or when
I make a post
On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 at 09:21:53 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
However, if you have any specific feedback on how to improve
the proposal itself, then please post it in the feedback
thread. The feedback thread will be the source for the review
summary that I will write at the end of this
The Final Review of DIP 1033, "Implicit Conversion of Expressions
to Delegates", wrapped up early this month. At the time, after a
discussion about the DIP with Atila, Walter asked me to delay the
Formal Assessment. More recently, he has informed me that he
needs to give some thought as to how
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 13:04:42 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
You have a valid point, but still I am sure the facebook group
is a net positive for the community. I'd see it as a digital
version of a local user group.
Yeah, I see no problem with the group existing. I think it's
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 00:38:40 UTC, Murilo wrote:
And apart from all that, having an official FB group serves to
show Dlang is growing strong and proud, it shows the world that
Dlang is not dead(most people think it is).
I'm happy it's working for you, but please do not present
On Sunday, 20 December 2020 at 11:39:14 UTC, Selim Ozel wrote:
On Saturday, 19 December 2020 at 17:48:37 UTC, Ethan wrote:
On Saturday, 19 December 2020 at 15:15:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
I've started up a meeting for people to come and go as they
please.
BEERCONF
Did I miss this? That
The first round of Community Review for DIP 1038, "@nodiscard",
is now under way. Please discuss the DIP (its merits, its
implementation, peripheral topics, etc.) in the Discussion Thread
and save all review feedback (critiques on the content of the
DIP: what to change, how to improve it,
On Monday, 7 December 2020 at 10:29:24 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
After a brief respite, I've gotten back to work. I've just
updated the DConf Online site with links to all the slides
(including Mathis Beer's) and prerecorded videos.
https://dconf.org/2020/online/index.html
After a brief respite, I've gotten back to work. I've just
updated the DConf Online site with links to all the slides
(including Mathis Beer's) and prerecorded videos.
In the coming days, I'll add the slide links to the video
descriptions on YouTube and chop up the Q & A livestreams into
On Monday, 7 December 2020 at 08:35:35 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
So one more time for 2020, grab your best-loved beverages and
revered D topics, and join us December 19-20th to celebrate all
that we've collectively achieved this year, before finally
banishing 2020 into history's dustbin (and
On Wednesday, 25 November 2020 at 20:30:39 UTC, oddp wrote:
On 25.11.20 21:00, Faux Amis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Is there any way to watch the livestreams in stead of the
presentations only?
Well, the youtube channel has these two Q livestreams, each
around six hours long, along
On Monday, 23 November 2020 at 07:39:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Thanks go out to all the people who helped out by asking
questions that made the chats interesting and informative.
Special thanks go out to our speakers who provided the
technical presentations:
Seconded. The presentations
I've written up a blog post describing how to take part in DConf
Online 2020. If anything isn't clear, let me know.
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/11/20/dconf-online-2020-how-to-participate/
In the course of scheduling the video premieres on our YouTube
channel, I learned that YouTube only offers time options on the
hour and every quarter hour after. Since a few of the talks were
listed on the website schedule as starting at :10, :20, or :40,
I've had to adjust them 5-minutes back
The Final Review for DIP 1033, "Implicit Conversion of
Expressions to Delegates", has begun.
The purpose of the Final Review is a last check to make sure
everything is in good shape. Generally, we aren't looking for
major revisions to the DIP unless someone notices something
critical. This
On Monday, 16 November 2020 at 06:27:48 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
moved from 19:20 UTC on Sunday to 15:20 UTC on Saturday.
Sorry, that should be 17:20 UTC on Saturday.
Now that we know exactly how long the talks are, we found the
need to fill some dead space for a video shorter than expected
and reclaim some extra post-talk Q & A space for a video that
turned out longer than expected. So we shuffled the schedule
around a bit to make it happen.
The biggest
Recently, Google put out an announcement on the GSoC mailing list
about their plans for GSoC 2021. They're doing things differently
this time.
A big change is that the event is being cut down to 10 weeks,
with 2 evaluations rather than 3. That means we will need to
think of project ideas
On Thursday, 12 November 2020 at 17:01:51 UTC, Greatsam4sure
wrote:
On Thursday, 12 November 2020 at 08:34:46 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 November 2020 at 12:33:44 UTC, Greatsam4sure
wrote:
Is Andrei not having anything for the community in this dlang
online conference?
All
On Wednesday, 11 November 2020 at 12:33:44 UTC, Greatsam4sure
wrote:
Is Andrei not having anything for the community in this dlang
online conference?
All the talks are in the published schedule.
On the first day of the conference, we've swapped Robert and
Ali's timeslots. Ali's talk is now at 15:20 UTC and Robert's is
at 16:40.
https://dconf.org/2020/online/index.html
On Monday, 2 November 2020 at 18:23:35 UTC, Seb wrote:
I'm sorry about the rather aggressive tone.
Thank you.
On Monday, 2 November 2020 at 15:08:43 UTC, Seb wrote:
A worrying side note here is that there have been many private
and public mails about the root causes (three years ago the
registry was crashing because the VM only had 200M of memory
and a small GC leak made the server collect slightly
We've added a "lightning talk" to the DConf Online 2020 schedule.
Alexandru Militaru, whom you may remember from his DConf 2019
presentation, will give a ~15-minute talk about sil-cling, an
extension to the Symmetry Integration Language (SIL). The talk is
taking the 19:20 UTC slot on November
I've finally gotten around to finishing up the port of
DerelictSFML2 to BindBC:
http://bindbc-sfml.dub.pm/
Unlike the Derelict package, it supports every release of CSFML
from 2.0 to 2.5. It's untested beyond compiling and loading, so I
appreciate any bug reports anyone files.
One issue I
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 12:16:00 UTC, IGotD- wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 October 2020 at 12:41:34 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
The DConf Online schedule is now live on the website. I've got
a blog post coming tomorrow which will, among other things,
include an announcement about the schedule
The first round of Community Review for DIP 1037, "Add Unary
Operator ...", is now under way. Please discuss the DIP (its
merits, its implementation, peripheral topics, etc.) in the
Discussion Thread and save all review feedback (critiques on the
content of the DIP: what to change, how to
On Wednesday, 14 October 2020 at 12:41:34 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I've got a blog post coming tomorrow
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/10/15/d-2-094-0-dconf-online-schedule-and-saoc-2020/
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/jbp7j6/d_2094_released/
On Wednesday, 14 October 2020 at 14:07:39 UTC, Ezneh wrote:
I found few typos in the following parts of the text:
Thanks!
The DConf Online schedule is now live on the website. I've got a
blog post coming tomorrow which will, among other things, include
an announcement about the schedule aimed at the world outside our
community in a form suitable for /r/programming.
https://dconf.org/2020/online/index.html
On Saturday, 3 October 2020 at 23:37:37 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 3 October 2020 at 23:15:41 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/3/20 4:12 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
What's the hashtag? #dconf2020 ?
Me not know hashtag but Mike has been saying that this is not
a DConf but a "DConf
On Saturday, 3 October 2020 at 23:15:41 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 10/3/20 4:12 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
What's the hashtag? #dconf2020 ?
Me not know hashtag but Mike has been saying that this is not a
DConf but a "DConf Online". Two different yearly events... :)
Ali
#dconf2020 works.
On Saturday, 3 October 2020 at 04:31:35 UTC, Dukc wrote:
Did you remember the schelude publication? It was supposed to
happen yesterday.
Yes. I'm behind schedule, but it's coming soon.
Jean-Louis Leroy sent in a blog post prompted by Andrei's
"Perfect forwarding" challenge from the July #beerconf. He digs
into D's metaprogramming and code generation facilities, and
shows how he arrived at his "refraction" module.
The blog:
The Final Review for DIP 1034, "Add a Bottom Type (reboot)", has
begun.
The purpose of the Final Review is a last check to make sure
everything is in good shape. Generally, we aren't looking for
major revisions to the DIP unless someone notices something
critical. This is a chance for any
On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 13:34:30 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy
wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
So they decided that a new `std.traits` template and a
corresponding `__traits` option are needed which expand into
the exact function signature of another
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 20:13:23 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:45:16 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
What Mike thinks appears nowhere in my post :-)
That's a bit sad. I understand that in your position it may be
hard to express a personnal opinion but I think
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:42:47 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy
wrote:
this point I have some hope that the DIP is not damaging in the
way Mike thinks.
What Mike thinks appears nowhere in my post :-)
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
During the assessment, Walter and Atila had a discussion
regarding this particular criticism:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.1117.1581368593.31109.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
"Named arguments breaks this very important pattern:
auto
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1030.md
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 at 13:10:39 UTC, James Lu wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 at 09:17:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I was on the verge to cutting the schedule down to one day,
but thanks to some last-minute submissions, looks like we'll
have enough content now to stretch across
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020 at 07:52:53 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 at 09:17:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I was on the verge to cutting the schedule down to one day,
but thanks to some last-minute submissions, looks like we'll
have enough content now to stretch
The first round of Community Review for DIP 1036, "Formatted
String Tuple Literals", is now under way. Please discuss the DIP
(its merits, its implementation, peripheral topics, etc.) in the
Discussion Thread and save all review feedback (critiques on the
content of the DIP: what to change,
I was on the verge to cutting the schedule down to one day, but
thanks to some last-minute submissions, looks like we'll have
enough content now to stretch across two days!
Thanks to everyone who submitted a proposal. I'll be in touch
with each of you soon to discuss how to proceed. For
On Sunday, 6 September 2020 at 13:29:55 UTC, Darren Drapkin wrote:
On Monday, 31 August 2020 at 08:36:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote
So send me your <= 5-minute videos describing your talks,
folks!
What do you think ?
--
Seems interesting! But the purpose of requiring video submissions
is
On Monday, 31 August 2020 at 08:36:09 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I've received exactly one submission for DConf Online. Two
keynotes + one talk does not make a conference.
So this is the last call. The deadline has been extended to
Sunday, September 6 AOE. This makes or breaks the conference.
I've received exactly one submission for DConf Online. Two
keynotes + one talk does not make a conference.
So this is the last call. The deadline has been extended to
Sunday, September 6 AOE. This makes or breaks the conference. If
we don't have enough talks submitted, it ain't happening.
Looking for a full-time or part-time gig? Not only is Symmetry
Investments hiring D programmers, they are also generously
funding two positions for ecosystem work under the D Language
Foundation. And they've put up a bounty for a new DUB feature.
Read all about it here:
On Sunday, 30 August 2020 at 00:13:19 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
https://dconf.org/2020/online/index.html
You don't need to do the whole talk on the video submission
right?
Right. A short video, no more than 5-minutes. Details are on the
site.
In my experience with DConf and SAOC, a number of
submissions/applications come in on the last day, but I usually
receive a some before then. So far, I haven't seen a single
submission for DConf Online.
If need be, I will extend the deadline by a week. I've been
hoping to have enough
On Saturday, 29 August 2020 at 09:18:56 UTC, Robert M. Münch
wrote:
A bit late... but I don't understand this part:
"Unlike x, p is not a member of the template. The
type Pair is a member, so we can’t refer to it without the
prefix."
* Why is it not a member of the template (specification)?
At the end of the final review of DIP 1032, "Function Pointer and
Delegate Parameters Inherit Attributes from Function", Walter
informed me he had decided he would reject the DIP on the grounds
that it doesn't offer enough utility to justify the potential for
code breakage. Since the DIP was
If you're interested in following along with the progress of
Symmetry Autumn of Code 2020, you can start with this blog post,
where I briefly introduce the participants and their SAOC
projects:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/08/23/symmetry-autumn-of-code-2020-projects-and-participants/
We've passed the SAOC 2020 application deadline and have received
a handful of applications. The SAOC committee will evaluate them
over the coming days. I'll announce the participants and their
projects next Sunday, August 23 with and introduction the
participants and their projects on the
Hello folks. I've put some deadline reminders and announced some
new swag on the blog. If you're hoping to participate in SAOC
2020, the application deadline is a week away!
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/08/09/deadlines-and-new-swag/
The Final Review for DIP 1032, "Function Pointer and Delegate
Parameters Inherit Attributes from Function", has begun.
The purpose of the Final Review is a last check to make sure
everything is in good shape. Generally, we aren't looking for
major revisions to the DIP unless someone notices
On Friday, 31 July 2020 at 22:58:07 UTC, Mario Kröplin wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2020 at 13:46:43 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2020/07/31/the-abcs-of-templates-in-d/
Minor detail: in "Even shorter syntax" the point is not that
the template has only one parameter,
On Friday, 31 July 2020 at 17:55:54 UTC, Bruce Carneal wrote:
Good writing for the not-quite-beginner-and-up audience Mike.
Reading it reminded me of how much I had been taking for
granted, of how much power D provides with minimal drag.
Really hope I never have to go back to C++/CUDA.
On Friday, 31 July 2020 at 17:57:58 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:46:43PM +, Mike Parker via
Not sure how blog-worthy this is,
It is! I'll be in touch :-)
301 - 400 of 1058 matches
Mail list logo
