On 11/20/2012 6:36 PM, xenon325 wrote:
On slide #39 there is `public:`. So I guess they consider module scope at least
in future versions of module system.
True, but I was thinking of what happens when module A defines public X, and
module B defines public X. Then A and B are imported.
On 12/6/2012 9:38 PM, seeker wrote:
Hi,
when will next new Version with 64bit support be available for download?
You can download it now (as an alpha).
On 12/7/2012 8:18 AM, seeker wrote:
okay, is there a new alpha already? - and how long will it take to get a
version 2.061?
hopefully soon.
Is now pointing to the new media wiki setup.
On 12/13/2012 12:34 PM, Joshua Niehus wrote:
in case anyone missed it:
http://www.drdobbs.com/cpp/porting-the-d-compiler-to-win64/240144208
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/14sm24/how_we_ported_the_d_compiler_to_win64/
For all things specific to LDC.
On 12/18/2012 1:31 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I suppose you would want me to talk gdc. :o)
I suspect a session by you on gdc would generate a lot of interest. ditto for
David on ldc.
On 12/22/2012 5:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 22, 2012 17:36:11 Brad Roberts wrote:
On 12/22/2012 3:44 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
What is nice about making a pull request against staging is that the
reviewer knows that the fix can be applied that far (not that comments
wou
On 12/24/2012 1:38 PM, John Colvin wrote:
If people aren't fussy about the EULA (which is apparently not valid in the EU
anyway)
I'd rather we stick to the EULA, much as I don't like them.
On 12/24/2012 2:52 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
If you want to be able to use DWT it might be a good idea to support inner
classes. If I recall correctly they are used in DWT.
I don't particularly like inner classes (I find them confusing), but they were
added specifically to support DWT and make
On 12/25/2012 5:27 AM, John Colvin wrote:
If only we had some small commercial support of some sort... A mac mini is less
than £500 new here in the UK, probably less than that in the US and that's not
even considering second-hand...
An old, slow, second hand one would be fine, as long as it can
On 12/26/2012 2:08 PM, Phil Lavoie wrote:
Anyone knows when the new version will be available for download? An E.T.A.
would be fine.
It is now. Please subscribe to the dmd-beta mailing list, where such
notifications go.
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2
On 12/27/2012 6:17 PM, evilrat wrote:
will there be OOP wrapper? or deimos is purely for C headers translation?
Deimos is purely for C header translation.
The big news is Win64 is now supported (in alpha).
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/download.html
D 1.076 changelog: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
A couple issues:
1. the dlang.org isn't updated yet.
2. the OS X package hasn't been built yet (problems with the package script).
I
On 1/1/2013 3:46 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
2. the OS X package hasn't been built yet (problems with the package script).
The OS X release is in the dmd.2.061.zip file, though.
On 1/1/2013 5:39 PM, bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/download.html
Is this link correct?
https://github.com/downloads/D-Programming-Language/dmd/dmd.2.061.zip
No. I fixed it. You can also try:
http://downloads.dlang.org.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com
On 1/1/2013 7:11 PM, bearophile wrote:
In the D2 changelog the "Phobos Bugs Fixed" seems empty.
Corrected now.
On 1/2/2013 4:12 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-02 00:46, Walter Bright wrote:
2. the OS X package hasn't been built yet (problems with the package
script).
What isn't working? Is there something I can do to help?
The various packages are all built on Ubuntu. The OS X
On 1/2/2013 7:27 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
That's unfortunately normal for every dmd release. We try to stay API
compatible, but ABI usually breaks with every compiler/druntime/phobos
update. This means you can't mix object/library files compiled with
different compiler versions.
I go to some ef
On 1/2/2013 9:59 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 17:53:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/2/2013 4:12 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-02 00:46, Walter Bright wrote:
2. the OS X package hasn't been built yet (problems with the package
script).
What isn'
On 1/2/2013 10:37 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
Al 02/01/13 19:07, En/na Walter Bright ha escrit:
Really? http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/ruby
Yeah, really. sudo apt-get ruby fails on Ubuntu 10.10.
$ sudo apt-get install ruby
That's what I did try, and yes, it fails too.
On 1/2/2013 10:17 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 10:07 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
Yeah, really. sudo apt-get ruby fails on Ubuntu 10.10.
Any and all apt-related commands are likely to fail for that version of
Ubuntu, it is no longer supported. Definitely need to stick
On 1/2/2013 11:09 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 10:51 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
I've been avoiding upgrading Ubuntu, because the last time I did that the
installer trashed everything. Lost a day on that one.
Just because it happened once doesn't mean it w
On 1/2/2013 11:09 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
I don't know why.
mercury ~> sudo apt-get install ruby
[sudo] password for walter:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
On 1/2/2013 11:05 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
To be expected in the circumstances since 10.10 is no longer supported.
Looks like I'll have to hold my nose and push the upgrade button, but after this
release is settled down.
Does the latest Ubuntu work properly with SSD drives? I know 10.10 doe
On 1/2/2013 12:01 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
P.S. I like calendar programs, but on Windows and Ubuntu, upgrading the
OS inevitably deletes the calendar database. None of those frackin'
calendar programs ever deign to tell me where they store their frackin'
database, so I can back it up. I really
On 1/2/2013 12:47 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-02 21:37, Walter Bright wrote:
Windows has gotten better in this regard, that is true.
But it's still bizarre that, with Thunderbird, you can export/import the
address book, but not the mail database.
A welcome improvement would
On 1/2/2013 12:56 PM, Matthew Caron wrote:
On 01/02/2013 03:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
But it's still bizarre that, with Thunderbird, you can export/import the
address book, but not the mail database.
Why would you need to? If your mail store is IMAP, just let it rebuild.
I don&#x
On 1/2/2013 12:36 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-02 19:51, Walter Bright wrote:
I've been avoiding upgrading Ubuntu, because the last time I did that
the installer trashed everything. Lost a day on that one.
That's what backups are for :)
Having backups doesn't work s
On 1/2/2013 1:29 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, January 02, 2013 13:18:02 Walter Bright wrote:
What is the rationale behind import/export of address books, and not doing
that for anything else?
I don't know. kmail has basically the same problem. It drives me nuts that you
On 1/2/2013 1:32 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
It also nuked all my mail and calender data, which is why I don't use Ubuntu for
mail or calender anymore, nor do I use it for music (same thing happened).
Over-reaction to the wrong issue. Evolution is entirely fine for mail
and calendar, I use it all
On 1/2/2013 2:45 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 at 07:01:02 UTC, Bernard Helyer wrote:
I am getting a whole _mess_ of "warning: statement not reachable"
on everything after a final switch.
I can confirm this. Freaking annoying (and not really convincing me that D is
stable)
On 1/2/2013 2:58 PM, Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
Been anticipating this release
for eons, it seems.
Me too. I'm glad to get it out the door, as my head is boiling over with things
I want to get done for the next version.
On 1/2/2013 8:15 PM, Marco Nembrini wrote:
On 03.01.2013 08:40, Walter Bright wrote:
The most miserable of all is Microsoft Outlook Express, which stores all
the info in hidden directories that are down a long chain of paths
filled with directory names that are GUID identifiers.
Then, the
On 1/3/2013 12:25 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
1/3/2013 12:22 PM, Russel Winder пишет:
I threw in the towel on Ubuntu when Unity came out as the default UI.
Going OT but can't agree more :)
I use a command prompt, and don't particular care about the UI .
On 1/2/2013 11:53 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 13:18 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
I don't store email on the server, I store it locally.
I think that this is at the heart of your mail problems. It means you
rely on one and only one computer for email. I would find
On 1/3/2013 12:06 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
No idea I'm afraid. On the other hand if an SSD does not emulate the
controller API for a SATA disk, then it isn't a disk, it's a something
else.
The OS needs to support TRIM, or the SSD disk will get very slow.
Does D have a CI suite of machines?
On 1/3/2013 12:06 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 11:30 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
Does the latest Ubuntu work properly with SSD drives? I know 10.10 does not. I
have an extra SSD drive I want to try.
No idea I'm afraid.
Googling it reveals the usual wishy-washy answe
On 1/3/2013 1:20 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
(*) SSD should have all the flashing management algorithms built in to
the firmware, the OS should not be able to distinguish an SSD from a
random access sequence of bytes accessed as a SATA device. We were
using flash devices in 2004 when all this was a
On 1/3/2013 1:22 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
I don't see that local or server-based storage makes any difference to
the ability to manage email. But maybe I am missing something about your
particular workflow.
1. I control the backups
2. Third parties don't have access to my email history. I don'
On 1/3/2013 8:28 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/3/13 3:32 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
I know. On the other hand, you have control over your email data.
FWIW it's all an illusion. Mail is sent unsecured so securing the mail sent and
received is futile.
I know it doesn't guarantee
On 1/3/2013 5:20 AM, Matthew Caron wrote:
On 01/02/2013 04:18 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Why would you need to? If your mail store is IMAP, just let it rebuild.
I don't store email on the server, I store it locally.
I gave that up years ago when I ended up with more than one device. Too
On 1/3/2013 2:17 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
The very existence of TRIM indicates a systemic
problem.
I think you misunderstand what TRIM is. Nobody anticipated a need for TRIM
before SSDs, so no operating system issued TRIM commands.
It's like saying C has a systemic problem because it doesn't
On 1/3/2013 3:27 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I can also add that the latest upgrades I have performed I cloned the hard drive
containing the OS. Then I perform the upgrade on the clone, if everything works
ok I either run the clone instead or does the same on the original disk.
That's probably t
On 1/3/2013 10:11 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 01/01/2013 03:46 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> 1. the dlang.org isn't updated yet.
Is the change log available somewhere else? I want to spread the news but it is
not very interesting without knowing what has changed. :)
http://d
On 1/3/2013 2:40 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 01:26 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
Windows 7 has TRIM support, Windows XP does not. I have an SSD drive in an XP
machine, it runs as slow as a spinning disk. An SSD in Win7, with TRIM, runs
like lightning.
Linux had TRIM
On 1/3/2013 10:53 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 10:26 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
[…]
1. I control the backups
I run my own SMTP and IMAP server, including it's backing up. I like
control!
I agree that is the best solution.
On 1/3/2013 10:41 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Unless you're managing your own e-mail server (which you may be doing - I have
no idea), then even if you store your e-mail locally and delete it from the
server, you're still not saved from this.
I know - but it's less likely, and most ISPs delete
On 1/3/2013 11:17 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei "I don't yet run my own SMTP and IMAP server" Alexandrescu
Sheesh. How can you ever hold your head up again after that admission?
On 1/3/2013 11:36 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Oh. Those are links. I was wondering when the data was actually going to be
posted. When compared to the previous ones, it looks like there's only headers
with no information.
The idea is to add explanatory information to the bugzilla issue being po
On 1/3/2013 12:27 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
BTW, Changelogs looks extremely naked now, I think release notes are
really needed now. Al least for new features. Is far from ideal to make
people go through a bug report to know how they can adapt their code to
new features.
On the other hand, th
On 1/3/2013 3:38 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 3 January 2013 at 01:06:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Please post example to bugzilla.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9263
Thank you. (And whaddya know, Kenji just fixed it!)
On 1/3/2013 4:22 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Ran into some trouble to make it work, but awesome news : the GC collecting live
stuff problem is gone (most likely a closure bug rather than a GC bug).
There are still a couple of memory-corrupting closure bugs left. Turns out they
are rather hard to sol
On 1/3/2013 9:54 PM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
However, for outsiders like me, that manages development groups and is waiting
for D2 to become stable enough to start investing preliminary prototypes in D2
and developing software in house (first for tools while training new developers
with it) and giv
On 1/3/2013 9:54 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I do *not* think that a changelog new feature entry takes the place of
updating the documentation, and I do not agree with writing the
documentation twice (changelog and documentation).
In general, the only "new features" which need to be in the docu
On 1/3/2013 9:20 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Examples:
http://python.org/download/releases/3.3.0/
I see a list, one line per, with a clickable link. The only real difference is
that there's one extra click to get that list in the D changelog, but then it's
a list, one line per, with a clicka
On 1/3/2013 8:51 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Please, please, consider adding release notes, at least for new features is not
good enough to just use bugzilla links, you need a clear, succinct explanation
of the feature. Where would you put it? In the bug report itself? Most of the
time is not cl
On 1/3/2013 9:49 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
but other lines like
$(LI std.string: $(RED The implementations of std.string.format and
string.sformat have been replaced with improved implementations which conform
to writef. In some, rare cases, this will break code. Please see the
documentation f
On 1/3/2013 8:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Andrei "I know better than run my own SMTP/IMAP servers" Alexandrescu
All we need now is a Penny.
On 1/3/2013 7:44 PM, Bernard Helyer wrote:
* I'm still going to complain. :P
My dad always told me that the time to worry is when there's no grumbling :-)
On 1/3/2013 10:42 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Nobody has put forth that effort in the
past, resulting in the changelog being pretty crummy and woefully incomplete.
I apologize to Jonathan for that remark, because Jonathan has been putting out
an effort on this.
On 1/3/2013 11:15 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, January 03, 2013 23:03:23 Walter Bright wrote:
This is 3 separate enhancements, each of which should be its own issue, and
will certainly fit as the issue title.
If you think that these work as titles in bugzilla issues, you&#x
On 1/4/2013 12:16 AM, eles wrote:
Two concrete examples:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5992
is described in the list as: " Phobos Win64 - D2 "; At least, change its title
to something more human, like "Win64 alpha has been released with working
Phobos." (yes, that's exactly Don'
On 1/4/2013 2:11 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I just don't want to not have the ability to add notes to
developers beyond that.
You can do that. Just issue a pull request, and it'll get merged in.
On 1/4/2013 2:09 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
What's their purpose? I can understand automatically generating the list and
putting it in changelog.dd or putting some sort of javascript or whatnot in
there to generate the list when the page is loaded, but if you're just putting
a link to bugzilla t
On 1/4/2013 6:02 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 3 de January a las 23:03 me escribiste:
On 1/3/2013 9:49 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
but other lines like
$(LI std.string: $(RED The implementations of std.string.format and
string.sformat have been replaced with improved
On 1/4/2013 6:00 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
03-Jan-2013 12:39, Michal Minich пишет:
Newly discovered changes in C++11 on using const and mutable for thread
safety
http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/C-and-Beyond-2012-Herb-Sutter-You-dont-know-blank-and-blank
So now const is retrofitted as threa
On 1/4/2013 2:19 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
With all due respect I just plain refused crawling through the list of links of
bugzilla to understand the whole amount of changes and/or enhancements.
That's the way we've been doing it for years.
New features need to be featured (!) at the top
On 1/4/2013 8:13 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, January 04, 2013 15:03:42 deadalnix wrote:
Isn't that feature supposed to be here in that form for strategic
reasons and should remains kind of hidden ?
Yeah. I thought that UDAs were supposed to be undocumented for the moment?
No, that
On 1/4/2013 8:59 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
Don't you think a process that requires reviewing these titles *before* the
actual software release announcement posting would help?
Of course it would. Do you wish to help? All help is welcome.
On 1/4/2013 12:23 PM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
On 13-01-04 2:06 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/4/2013 8:59 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
Don't you think a process that requires reviewing these titles
*before* the
actual software release announcement posting would help?
Of course it would. D
On 1/3/2013 10:44 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
P.S. Also, as a future improvement, we _really_ shouldn't be linking to
bugzilla for our list. I've never seen a release notes document or changelog
do that in my entire life. It would be _far_ more user friendly to list the
changes like we did before
On 1/5/2013 1:30 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
I noticed that D 2.062 has no new features. What would it take to remove the
link to New/Changed Features on that version since there are none?
There will be.
On 1/5/2013 10:06 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
On 13-01-05 5:39 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/5/2013 1:30 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
I noticed that D 2.062 has no new features. What would it take to
remove the
link to New/Changed Features on that version since there are none?
There will be
On 1/6/2013 3:56 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I completely agree. We _need_ dynamic libraries. But the problem is that someone
just have to do it and Walter doesn't seem to be in a rush to implement it.
It's actually completely implemented in the compiler. I've spend considerable
effort making -f
On 1/6/2013 4:20 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
For the Go folks, it is all about issues with garbage collection and
thread management,
It is for D as well (along with TLS). Unfortunately, the druntime implementation
of these is complex, and I do not understand it.
On 1/6/2013 4:32 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I have tried myself a couple of times but there has always been some issue with
the compiler that needs to be fixed or implemented.
I have fixed every single PIC implementation compiler problem that has been
brought to my attention. If there are other
On 1/6/2013 7:20 AM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
Is there a file somewhere that lists all requested features, under development
features? Or the various mailing lists the only source of information?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity=enhancement&bug_status=
On 1/6/2013 3:47 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Does this mean that we need Sean Kelly to do it? If so, we're in trouble,
because he seems to be _very_ busy these days and is generally uninvolved. I
don't know if anyone else knows the code well enough to attempt it. Hopefully,
someone does or is wil
On 1/6/2013 3:49 PM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
If this list already contains all (does it?) of what is currently identified
then is there some criteria one can use to try to infer what will be implemented
in the next release? Or is it just "first come first served" where the solved
enhancements autom
On 1/6/2013 8:42 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Like browsers, for instance. When Microsoft had their browser merely
uninstallable and set as the *initial* default browser, the DOJ went
apeshit, nevermind the fact that MS did *nothing* to prevent people
from downloading and using competing browsers.
On 1/6/2013 6:15 PM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
So, given that enhancements are identified in Bugzilla, is there a review
process? Are ticket priorities and vote used? Who decides what is the priority
of an enhancement? Who assigns them?
Pretty much anyone who wants to take one of them on does s
On 1/6/2013 7:30 PM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
Understood, that's pretty much always the case for any programming language.
Now, for someone from the outside, how would someone know what are the latest
features?
In the changelog, click on New/Changed Features.
Would it be possible to identify the
On 1/6/2013 11:57 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-07 01:25, Walter Bright wrote:
Sean would be the main one, but really anyone who is willing to get down
and dirty with threads and such can do it.
Martin Nowak has already started on this, it seems he know what he's doing:
On 1/6/2013 11:57 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-07 00:14, Walter Bright wrote:
Where it is not implemented is in druntime. The folks who work on
druntime are the ones that need convincing.
I didn't know you had stopped working on the runtime.
I now focus on the compiler, though
On 1/6/2013 11:51 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-07 00:19, Walter Bright wrote:
I have fixed every single PIC implementation compiler problem that has
been brought to my attention. If there are others, I am not aware of
them. Please let me know the bugzilla issue numbers for any I have
On 1/7/2013 4:41 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Monday, 7 January 2013 at 10:14:54 UTC, Robert Clipsham wrote:
Though I believe it will probably fail with older OS X versions which don't
have TLS support.
Yes, it is not supported by linker and dyld versions shipping with OS X 10.7.
This is also
On 1/7/2013 5:31 AM, Chris wrote:
Nice article. Once I have enough time I would like to write a short article
about how D has solved practical issues for me.
Please do!
I think it is not enough to talk
about all the features of the language (templates, GC) without giving practical
examples
On 1/7/2013 8:31 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter can write a roadmap, nobody will listen to him.
One thing that few people know is that Walter and I have tried to kindly
convince people to work on specific things we believed were important. Such
attempts have been largely unsuccessful.
T
On 1/7/2013 11:40 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 7 de January a las 08:31 me escribiste:
One thing I want to do is enshrine a vetting mechanism that would
allow Walter and myself to "pre-approve" enhancement requests.
Someone (including us) would submit an enhancement requ
On 1/7/2013 12:12 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-07 20:54, Walter Bright wrote:
It's pretty clear where we'll be going with this. We'll be abandoning OS
X versions older than 10.7.
Would it be a bad idea and do what the dynamic linker does in the druntime to
support
On 1/7/2013 3:19 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:08:58 +0100
"deadalnix" wrote:
However, it is just to discover that this do not work :
struct Bar {}
auto foo(ref Bar bar) {}
foo(Bar()); // Now this is an error !
I still have code broken all over the place.
IIRC, they tr
On 1/7/2013 8:17 PM, Pierre Rouleau wrote:
And now I understand that D1 is no longer officially supported. If I understand
properly D1 first release was 6 years ago. Lets assume I would have started a
product development with it say 2 years ago because it was deemed relatively
stable then. And
On 1/8/2013 4:34 AM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
What about licensing issues, is it even legal to for D1's backend? I mean, I
don't mind doing it personally, because I believe I won't have any problems.
But company lawyers don't think so positively :)
If you've got a licensing issue, talk to me a
On 1/8/2013 4:52 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 08:27 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm running 10.7 on my white MacBook from 2006.
Interesting, I was told not to try upgrading to Lion, but to stay with
Snow Leopard.
MacBook2.1, Core 2 Duo, 2GB.
This has a 64-bit processor, b
On 1/9/2013 2:28 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-09 11:26, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I think it sounds like that but I don't know. I'm just trying to figure
out how TLS is implemented on Mac OS X 10.7+.
Also, there's nothing else that calls this tlv_get_addr function or the thunk so
I'm gues
On 1/4/2013 12:10 PM, r_m_r wrote:
I was wondering if it is possible to integrate some javascript in the changelog
page to automatically generate the list of fixed issues as suggested by Jonathan
(As an example, please see the attached file: jq.html).
Thanks for doing this. It's an interesting
On 1/9/2013 11:02 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
As I said, I don't know assembly but here's the output:
Good time to learn it!
And I'm not kidding.
On 1/10/2013 10:30 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-10 06:18, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/9/2013 11:02 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
As I said, I don't know assembly but here's the output:
Good time to learn it!
Do you have any good books to recommend for this?
No. But a reasona
On 1/10/2013 8:22 PM, deadalnix wrote:
I have to concurs with Walter here.
I know that must be hard for you, and I admire your sacrifice!
:-)
801 - 900 of 2708 matches
Mail list logo
