On 18 May 2013 21:02, Dicebot wrote:
> Are there any practical reasons for this other than no one actually
> cared to keep ABI synced?
>
The D ABI used by DMD is bespoke, and there are some problems in 64bit C
ABI.
LDC afaik has a half and half situation which is no good to anyone.
GDC uses wh
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 19:54:26 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
Besides other issues, the most fundamental is that the various
D compilers are actually not ABI-compatible.
Oh shi~. New discoveries every day. That is.. inconvenient. Kind
of delays any possibility of proper packaging a lot. I a
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 19:22:36 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I thought about asking your advice on this topic but it was not
urgent enough :) What currently prevents having different
runtimes but single phobos library for different compilers?
Besides other issues, the most fundamental is that the
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 19:19:10 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Agreed. I had this discussion recently too along the topic of:
Should we
allow people to install libphobos/libdruntime in a common
library
directory, or keep it private as an integral part of the
compiler? IMO,
giving given it's c
On 18 May 2013 20:09, Brad Roberts wrote:
> On 5/18/13 8:59 AM, nazriel wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 15:26:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 14:19:08 UTC, nazriel wrote:
>>>
Will be shared library installed alongside with static library?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>
On 5/18/13 8:59 AM, nazriel wrote:
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 15:26:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 14:19:08 UTC, nazriel wrote:
Will be shared library installed alongside with static library?
Yes.
Cool!
Will libdruntime.so belong to druntime package?
No. Currently t
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 15:26:49 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 14:19:08 UTC, nazriel wrote:
Will be shared library installed alongside with static library?
Yes.
Cool!
Will libdruntime.so belong to druntime package?
No. Currently there is no separate druntime package
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 14:19:08 UTC, nazriel wrote:
Will be shared library installed alongside with static library?
Yes.
Will libdruntime.so belong to druntime package?
No. Currently there is no separate druntime package as druntime
is part of phobos binary. This will be a separate is
On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 09:17:08 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I have reached conceptual agreement with dmd package maintainer
(Sven-Hendrik Haase), new PKGBUILD's are written and change is
planned together with 2.063 release.
Important stuff to be aware of (mostly important to AUR
packagers):
*
I have reached conceptual agreement with dmd package maintainer
(Sven-Hendrik Haase), new PKGBUILD's are written and change is
planned together with 2.063 release.
Important stuff to be aware of (mostly important to AUR
packagers):
* dmd now provides virtual package "d-compiler" of version t
10 matches
Mail list logo
