Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On 03/18/2013 05:51 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 17/03/13 23:29, En/na 1100110 ha escrit: On 03/17/2013 04:05 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 17/03/13 21:41, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 20:00 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: […] I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am not getting an update from the repository. That's correct. There will be deb updates for every dub beta release. The problem is that all updates to the repository need to have a monotonically increasing version number or clients will not refresh. The packager number needs to be updated to 0.9.11-1 so I can install it. I don't understand you. What you get if you writes: $ sudo apt-get install dub The following packages have unmet dependencies: dub : Depends: libc6 (= 2.14) but 2.13-38 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. So I'm about to piss some people off when I say that should never have been allowed into the repository. It's the only D package in there that makes such assumptions. Get it together and recompile the package please. Ok, what's the oldest Linux release that these packages has to support? Anyway, I've built and uploaded new dub Debian packages. All of them seem to work just fine on Debian Stable. So at least that. Exact hits Package libc6 squeeze (stable) (libs): Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries 2.11.3-4: amd64 armel i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc wheezy (testing) (libs): Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries 2.13-38: amd64 armel armhf i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc sid (unstable) (libs): Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries 2.13-38: amd64 armel armhf i386 mips mipsel powerpc powerpcspe 2.11.2-10: hppa (poor hppa) experimental ~2.17 (I guess...Ubuntu?) 2.14
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
Al 17/03/13 23:29, En/na 1100110 ha escrit: On 03/17/2013 04:05 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 17/03/13 21:41, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 20:00 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: […] I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am not getting an update from the repository. That's correct. There will be deb updates for every dub beta release. The problem is that all updates to the repository need to have a monotonically increasing version number or clients will not refresh. The packager number needs to be updated to 0.9.11-1 so I can install it. I don't understand you. What you get if you writes: $ sudo apt-get install dub The following packages have unmet dependencies: dub : Depends: libc6 (= 2.14) but 2.13-38 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. So I'm about to piss some people off when I say that should never have been allowed into the repository. It's the only D package in there that makes such assumptions. Get it together and recompile the package please. Ok, what's the oldest Linux release that these packages has to support? Anyway, I've built and uploaded new dub Debian packages. -- Jordi Sayol
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
Is anyone doing MacPorts ports for this, and indeed all the D stuff? Or perhaps there are HomeBrew packages? Thanks. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:51 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: […] Anyway, I've built and uploaded new dub Debian packages. New packages have refreshed and are now installed on my Debian Unstable machines. Thanks. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 13:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 10/03/13 12:57, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: Any chance of working with Jordi to get Debian packages into d-apt? I'll create DUB deb packages soon. Sorted. Thanks. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 07:52 +, Russel Winder wrote: On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 13:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 10/03/13 12:57, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: Any chance of working with Jordi to get Debian packages into d-apt? I'll create DUB deb packages soon. Sorted. Thanks. Ah, except that it is compiled against libc6 2.14 and I am using Debian Unstable which is stuck on 2.13. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Saturday, 9 March 2013 at 13:48:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: [snip] Thanks for dub. Really helps a lot.
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
I've created new dub Debian packages and upload them at: https://code.google.com/p/d-apt/ Test and comments are welcome. -- Jordi Sayol
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
Al 17/03/13 08:54, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 07:52 +, Russel Winder wrote: On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 13:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 10/03/13 12:57, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: Any chance of working with Jordi to get Debian packages into d-apt? I'll create DUB deb packages soon. Sorted. Thanks. Ah, except that it is compiled against libc6 2.14 and I am using Debian Unstable which is stuck on 2.13. Can you test the new dub Debian packages please? https://code.google.com/p/d-apt/ -- Jordi Sayol
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 11:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: […] Can you test the new dub Debian packages please? https://code.google.com/p/d-apt/ I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am not getting an update from the repository. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 11:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: […] Can you test the new dub Debian packages please? https://code.google.com/p/d-apt/ I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am not getting an update from the repository. That's correct. There will be deb updates for every dub beta release. - -- Jordi Sayol -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRRhLDAAoJELJPaKLsI7W2S38P/RrAItIPAW852SuqAs3wmuRD /tMHOec8rIOqcO5/is7dArmlnGGeTFZ0nBnAvEAcz07YJzmVkoN3bgVYeqiKw4xv SmiR3oOKfAlSIbwRQeA4xHG9vOtBw5oHajEUIuHJIHTQ9Gd9E+Z2lQmfEtoOhtCT n+0UIML13zkcGC/TO9HGvh+frg5GUVfBHdbT9R09q0JwfZcfdCs4XZeQahO8RQsj ib44uqOwor3TZHfn3QskmziiY/xuCI0Wio+i5PFZ2OZL0U8sJk6ACjmCzE+nHhny ySSqsg3/C8EsBEeCq9Y+cjfP43h+B13N5EDC3DJ5lslPxF99gXFO8rDmb7LL4EWR K3BOMmAc9g5jBCGo+TYtXWTQWsr2K/MKuPKje6r12VV5Ccwe13Jt8rnVI6sf6pL+ DBylxXyUpTW5g6yuUQq/2z0yuM7QKqYCoKHaCiFn6M7aILIRbbQ4ltkyEFov6rVF lG6S/GtBJJvH7+FHtz2VbNjOYTnXR3XxQ49aKP1Ht8l2LIv9QGlsfe33lRgSEWUC rq1Z6gDr/cj6D8gyMt9p7G8p+CsGjfBqq254WiwtMlmcs+epakqOQ8MQHohhtuCW 1o9FXMN6yy9xUKGUk/nnOQaFMtwiXartugvL8rQx7rcXyuDE8wpFNwldJ+wJgbZS 0+m9MSJPrL2UEZaBbHw8 =SQcQ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 11:16 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: […] Can you test the new dub Debian packages please? https://code.google.com/p/d-apt/ I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am not getting an update from the repository. That's correct. There will be deb updates for every dub beta release. -- Jordi Sayol
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 20:00 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: […] I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am not getting an update from the repository. That's correct. There will be deb updates for every dub beta release. The problem is that all updates to the repository need to have a monotonically increasing version number or clients will not refresh. The packager number needs to be updated to 0.9.11-1 so I can install it. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
Al 17/03/13 21:41, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 20:00 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: […] I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am not getting an update from the repository. That's correct. There will be deb updates for every dub beta release. The problem is that all updates to the repository need to have a monotonically increasing version number or clients will not refresh. The packager number needs to be updated to 0.9.11-1 so I can install it. I don't understand you. What you get if you writes: $ sudo apt-get install dub -- Jordi Sayol
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On 03/17/2013 04:05 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 17/03/13 21:41, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 20:00 +0100, Jordi Sayol wrote: Al 17/03/13 19:22, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: […] I am guessing that the number of the package is still 0.9.11-0 as I am not getting an update from the repository. That's correct. There will be deb updates for every dub beta release. The problem is that all updates to the repository need to have a monotonically increasing version number or clients will not refresh. The packager number needs to be updated to 0.9.11-1 so I can install it. I don't understand you. What you get if you writes: $ sudo apt-get install dub The following packages have unmet dependencies: dub : Depends: libc6 (= 2.14) but 2.13-38 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. So I'm about to piss some people off when I say that should never have been allowed into the repository. It's the only D package in there that makes such assumptions. Get it together and recompile the package please.
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Monday, 11 March 2013 at 06:58:35 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Somtimes I really wonder what's up with DMDs error messages. This code has been there since ages and never triggered an error here, even on DMD 2.062 (and it rightfully should have triggered one). Anyway, It's fixed now on master. Huh? It was platform-specific?
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
Am 15.03.2013 17:37, schrieb Kagamin: On Monday, 11 March 2013 at 06:58:35 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Somtimes I really wonder what's up with DMDs error messages. This code has been there since ages and never triggered an error here, even on DMD 2.062 (and it rightfully should have triggered one). Anyway, It's fixed now on master. Huh? It was platform-specific? No. I actually completely overlooked that it happened with DMD master and not on 2.062. So probably it was a recent accepts-invalid fix. But in the past I actually had incidents where things compiled for me on the same platform that failed for someone else - that's the original reason for my reply, sorry for the confusion.
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
Am 11.03.2013 04:20, schrieb Jonathan M Davis: Okay, it seems to work if I install dmd 2.062, but with the latest github master, build.sh is now failing with source/app.d(162): Error: need 'this' for 'UninstallVersionWildcard' of type 'immutable(char[])' Failed: 'dmd' '-g' '-debug' '-Isource' '-L-lcurl' '-v' '-o-' 'source/app.d' '- Isource' I don't know why it was failing before without an error message, but I guess that something was updated in the D stuff since last night which affected it. Without digging into it though, I don't know if the error is a regression in the D stuff somewhere, or if the dub code has a legitimate problem that the compiler complains about now when it didn't before. - Jonathan M Davis Somtimes I really wonder what's up with DMDs error messages. This code has been there since ages and never triggered an error here, even on DMD 2.062 (and it rightfully should have triggered one). Anyway, It's fixed now on master.
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Saturday, March 09, 2013 14:48:34 Sönke Ludwig wrote: For anybody who didn't read the thread [1] in the D newsgroup, DUB is a build and package manager for D projects with an emphasis on simplifying the build process and generally staying out of the way during software development. [SNIP] Has anyone else tried to build the new release on Arch Linux? Both the dub and dub-git packages are failing to build for me, giving == GIT checkout done or server timeout == Starting build... == ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... == ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build dub. And I have no idea what the problem is. If I run the build.sh file directly, no errors print out, but it's clearly returning something other than 0 when running rdmd. Anyone have any clue as to what's going on? - Jonathan M Davis
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 08:41:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: (...) Has anyone else tried to build the new release on Arch Linux? Both the dub and dub-git packages are failing to build for me, giving == GIT checkout done or server timeout == Starting build... == ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... == ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build dub. And I have no idea what the problem is. If I run the build.sh file directly, no errors print out, but it's clearly returning something other than 0 when running rdmd. Anyone have any clue as to what's going on? - Jonathan M Davis I didn't have any problems with dub or dub-git on arch64 using dmd 2.062 (also from AUR).
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 08:41:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: Has anyone else tried to build the new release on Arch Linux? I tested both dub and dub-git before updating them yesterday in the AUR, so yes. Currently for some reason github is unbearable slow for me, so I can't test it (cloning into the git repositories simply is too slow and it reaches timeout). I'll try later, again. Anyway, what dmd are you using? I'm using: Repository : community Name : dmd Version: 2.062-1 Both the dub and dub-git packages are failing to build for me, giving == GIT checkout done or server timeout == Starting build... == ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... == ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build dub. Probably a stupid question, but is you system up t date (as in sudo pacman -Syu)? And which architecture are you running it on?
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 11:51:31 Moritz Maxeiner wrote: Anyway, what dmd are you using? The latest from github. I did try using rdmd from 2.062 just in case it was an issue with rdmd, but that had no effect. I haven't yet tried installing the 2.062 version of dmd though. Probably a stupid question, but is you system up t date (as in sudo pacman -Syu)? Yes. And which architecture are you running it on? x86_64 - Jonathan M Davis
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 11:04:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: The latest from github. I did try using rdmd from 2.062 just in case it was an issue with rdmd, but that had no effect. I haven't yet tried installing the 2.062 version of dmd though. Probably a stupid question, but is you system up t date (as in sudo pacman -Syu)? Yes. And which architecture are you running it on? x86_64 Alright, seeing as the other two people here (simendsjo and me) are both using x86_64 as well and the only noticable difference is you using dmd-git and us using dmd 2.062 the next question would be: You said build.sh doesn't print any errors, but does the dub executable get build (when manually invoking build.sh), because if not then I would guess something inside the dmd git version broke/regressed.
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Saturday, 9 March 2013 at 13:48:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: For anybody who didn't read the thread [1] in the D newsgroup, DUB is a build and package manager for D projects with an emphasis on simplifying the build process and generally staying out of the way during software development. Could you also provide source tarballs for the releases in addition to the binary downloads (if it's not too much work)? Currently I use cloning dub and then getting the specific tag for making the dub package in Archlinux' AUR, but that isn't really how release version packages should work. They should download source tarballs and have checksums for them. If doable, that would include previous versions as well, not only new ones.
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
Any chance of working with Jordi to get Debian packages into d-apt? -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 08:41:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Saturday, March 09, 2013 14:48:34 Sönke Ludwig wrote: For anybody who didn't read the thread [1] in the D newsgroup, DUB is a build and package manager for D projects with an emphasis on simplifying the build process and generally staying out of the way during software development. [SNIP] Has anyone else tried to build the new release on Arch Linux? Both the dub and dub-git packages are failing to build for me, giving == GIT checkout done or server timeout == Starting build... == ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... == ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build dub. And I have no idea what the problem is. If I run the build.sh file directly, no errors print out, but it's clearly returning something other than 0 when running rdmd. Anyone have any clue as to what's going on? GitHub has been hit by a series of DDoS attacks recently: https://status.github.com/messages That's probably related to the issues you're seeing.
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
Al 10/03/13 12:57, En/na Russel Winder ha escrit: Any chance of working with Jordi to get Debian packages into d-apt? I'll create DUB deb packages soon. Regards, -- Jordi Sayol
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:00:31 +0100 Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote: GitHub has been hit by a series of DDoS attacks recently: https://status.github.com/messages That's probably related to the issues you're seeing. rant One of the top things that made the internet the great thing it is, heck one of the main *reasons* for the internet's precursor in the first place, was decentralization. DDoSes would have much lesser effects if people, such at those at those at GitHub, weren't so hell-bent on devolving the internet into a series of centralized services. Ex: A DDoS can hardly do shit against git itself, or usenet, or email, etc. But it sure as hell can bring centralized junk like GitHub, twitface, etc to their knees. DARPA realized this *decades* ago (before half of us were even born), set out to solve it, and thus the early internet was created. Hooray for regressing technology back to 1950. /rant
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 13:23:54 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: rant One of the top things that made the internet the great thing it is, heck one of the main *reasons* for the internet's precursor in the first place, was decentralization. ... /rant True, but given the choice between security and convenience a lot of people (including developers) will choose convenience. I get your frustration, but that's just how our species is (although genetic engineering may change that some day) and unless you can come up with a way that's both (reasonably) secure and at least as convenient as the insecure alternative there will be enough people around to popularize the insecure methods. That's just my pessimistic pov, though^^
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:08:01 +0100 Moritz Maxeiner mor...@ucworks.org wrote: On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 13:23:54 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: rant One of the top things that made the internet the great thing it is, heck one of the main *reasons* for the internet's precursor in the first place, was decentralization. ... /rant True, but given the choice between security and convenience a lot of people (including developers) will choose convenience. I get your frustration, but that's just how our species is (although genetic engineering may change that some day) and unless you can come up with a way that's both (reasonably) secure and at least as convenient as the insecure alternative there will be enough people around to popularize the insecure methods. That's just my pessimistic pov, though^^ Yea, I can't say that I disagree. I forget the origin and exact wording, but: Dancing pigs will win every time.
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On 03/10/2013 04:41 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Saturday, March 09, 2013 14:48:34 Sönke Ludwig wrote: For anybody who didn't read the thread [1] in the D newsgroup, DUB is a build and package manager for D projects with an emphasis on simplifying the build process and generally staying out of the way during software development. [SNIP] Has anyone else tried to build the new release on Arch Linux? Both the dub and dub-git packages are failing to build for me, giving == GIT checkout done or server timeout == Starting build... == ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... == ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build dub. And I have no idea what the problem is. If I run the build.sh file directly, no errors print out, but it's clearly returning something other than 0 when running rdmd. Anyone have any clue as to what's going on? - Jonathan M Davis For me, the only issue was in source/dub/compilers/ldc.d, lines 100 and 103. Just removing the break; got them to compile (All I did to compile was dub build from the previous release) -Matt Soucy
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
Am 10.03.2013 18:04, schrieb Matt Soucy: On 03/10/2013 04:41 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Saturday, March 09, 2013 14:48:34 Sönke Ludwig wrote: For anybody who didn't read the thread [1] in the D newsgroup, DUB is a build and package manager for D projects with an emphasis on simplifying the build process and generally staying out of the way during software development. [SNIP] Has anyone else tried to build the new release on Arch Linux? Both the dub and dub-git packages are failing to build for me, giving == GIT checkout done or server timeout == Starting build... == ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... == ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build dub. And I have no idea what the problem is. If I run the build.sh file directly, no errors print out, but it's clearly returning something other than 0 when running rdmd. Anyone have any clue as to what's going on? - Jonathan M Davis For me, the only issue was in source/dub/compilers/ldc.d, lines 100 and 103. Just removing the break; got them to compile (All I did to compile was dub build from the previous release) -Matt Soucy Fixed in repository now.
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
Am 10.03.2013 12:49, schrieb Moritz Maxeiner: On Saturday, 9 March 2013 at 13:48:53 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: For anybody who didn't read the thread [1] in the D newsgroup, DUB is a build and package manager for D projects with an emphasis on simplifying the build process and generally staying out of the way during software development. Could you also provide source tarballs for the releases in addition to the binary downloads (if it's not too much work)? Currently I use cloning dub and then getting the specific tag for making the dub package in Archlinux' AUR, but that isn't really how release version packages should work. They should download source tarballs and have checksums for them. If doable, that would include previous versions as well, not only new ones. I've added source download links that point directly to GitHub. I'm not sure, but I think GitHub doesn't supply checksums, so that would have to wait a bit until I have fully automated the release process.
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 08:41:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: == GIT checkout done or server timeout DUB outputs that? Git is not an acronym. It should be Git.
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 20:24:25 Jakob Ovrum wrote: On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 08:41:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: == GIT checkout done or server timeout DUB outputs that? Git is not an acronym. It should be Git. No, yaourt outputs that. I'm talking about building git for Arch, not using dub. - Jonathan M Davis
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 19:00:55 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: I've added source download links that point directly to GitHub. I'm not sure, but I think GitHub doesn't supply checksums, so that would have to wait a bit until I have fully automated the release process. Thanks, I only needed the source tarballs, the checksums I only mentioned to give a clear picture of why I need source tarballs. The checksums themselves I let makepkg generate for me (The package builder for Arch, with -g, it generates checksums for all the sources of a package).
Re: DUB 0.9.11 released
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:45:00 Moritz Maxeiner wrote: On Sunday, 10 March 2013 at 11:04:36 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: The latest from github. I did try using rdmd from 2.062 just in case it was an issue with rdmd, but that had no effect. I haven't yet tried installing the 2.062 version of dmd though. Probably a stupid question, but is you system up t date (as in sudo pacman -Syu)? Yes. And which architecture are you running it on? x86_64 Alright, seeing as the other two people here (simendsjo and me) are both using x86_64 as well and the only noticable difference is you using dmd-git and us using dmd 2.062 the next question would be: You said build.sh doesn't print any errors, but does the dub executable get build (when manually invoking build.sh), because if not then I would guess something inside the dmd git version broke/regressed. Okay, it seems to work if I install dmd 2.062, but with the latest github master, build.sh is now failing with source/app.d(162): Error: need 'this' for 'UninstallVersionWildcard' of type 'immutable(char[])' Failed: 'dmd' '-g' '-debug' '-Isource' '-L-lcurl' '-v' '-o-' 'source/app.d' '- Isource' I don't know why it was failing before without an error message, but I guess that something was updated in the D stuff since last night which affected it. Without digging into it though, I don't know if the error is a regression in the D stuff somewhere, or if the dub code has a legitimate problem that the compiler complains about now when it didn't before. - Jonathan M Davis
DUB 0.9.11 released
For anybody who didn't read the thread [1] in the D newsgroup, DUB is a build and package manager for D projects with an emphasis on simplifying the build process and generally staying out of the way during software development. The public package registry is located here (temporary): http://registry.vibed.org/ A number of changes have been incorporated since the last announced release in the other thread (around 0.9.8), based on feedback, requests, and previously planned changes: - Added the possibility to specify an explicit target type (e.g. static/dynamic library) - The way configurations are handled has been vastly improved (this is a breaking change, unfortunately) - An installer is available on Windows (thanks to Brad Anderson) - The docs build type now properly generates DDOC based documentation - A new ddox build type automatically installs ddox [2] and generates the documentation using that instead of DDOC - pre/post build/generate commands to invoke external tools are supported now - A list of excluded source files can now be specified (useful in conjunction with the sourcePaths field) - The registry supports Bitbucket now in addition to GitHub hosted projects - The online documentation (on the registry site) has been improved - Lots of smaller fixes and enhancements See http://registry.vibed.org/package-format for the current version of the package description specification (JSON based). A brief introduction is found at http://registry.vibed.org/about I have added a DUB forum to be able to discuss design issues or new features without cluttering up the D newsgroup (with two topics that crystallized during an e-mail conversation): http://news.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.dub/ Thanks to everyone who filed GitHub issues or pull requests so far. I originally planned to start slow with a limited set of features and extend gradually, but with all the requests that went in so far it feels like it is already relatively near to feature completeness [I probably shouldn't have said that :)]. Now it's important to nail down the final design or at least far enough to avoid breakage in the future. Sönke [1]: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/kfoei9$bmd$1...@digitalmars.com [2]: https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox
