On Thursday, 12 April 2018 at 22:41:16 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
DIP is an abbreviation for D Improvement Proposals, so in
theory we should have DIP for every bugfix (if I follow your
logic), because it is an improvment :D.
I see your point, but that was not my logic
My key point, was if this
DIP is an abbreviation for D Improvement Proposals, so in theory we should
have DIP for every bugfix (if I follow your logic), because it is an
improvment :D. No I do not agree with this. UDAs has been added before DIPs
and as original author said the definition of UDAs (
On Thursday, 12 April 2018 at 08:28:17 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
* Changes to the language itself, such as syntax/semantics
* Changes to the functional behavior of code generated by the
compiler
This proposal is a removal of a limitation on an existing
feature -- it neither modifies existing
On Thursday, 12 April 2018 at 08:28:17 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Around the same time, a Pull Request was created to implement
support for UDAs on function parameters [4]. In the comment
thread for this PR, Andrei said that he and Walter "agree this
can be integrated without a DIP." When he
On Thursday, 12 April 2018 at 08:28:17 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The main point of this post is to announce that the DIP "Enum
and Function Parameter Attributes" [1], which has recently been
under Draft Review, is no longer required. The DIP will be
feature will be implemented without the need
