Re: I was able to write some D last week!
From an earlier post: In particular, nginx can do a scgi proxy with a unix socket and this may be easier to use with your firewall and filesystem permissions. Oh, I tried it. First nginx didn't find the socket. Guess why? Because nginx runs in a virtualized filesystem. Relocated the socket, now nginx says access denied, sure nginx and your server can run under different accounts, permissions should be tweaked accordingly, tweaked them, still access denied, relocated the socket a bit more, still access denied. Guess why? I turned out to be some kind of audit, selinux or something like that, it just fails with generic access denied error. Ok, FHS recommends /var/run, but it's rwxr-xr-x root root. Wut? Run a network server as root? Tried tcp, it just works.
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 14:09:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 13:40:50 UTC, matheus wrote: Do you think that your libraries could fill this gap for D? Possibly. So I'm trying to convince my bosses at work to let me use D on the core product and one of the points I made is that D is really easy for new devs to use. An important aspect here is the eco system. If you can show that it also has a nice IDE (e.g. Intellij IDE) that's a plus point. The next question which will come: how it integrates with the existing build system / build artefact repository. Also can the unittest results, linter and coverage results displayed and even further evaluated (e.g. Jenkins or SonarQube). From a management point of view these are important points. D is getting better and better here, but is a slow process. Kind regards Andre
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 13:40:50 UTC, matheus wrote: Do you think that your libraries could fill this gap for D? Possibly. So I'm trying to convince my bosses at work to let me use D on the core product and one of the points I made is that D is really easy for new devs to use. Part of my strategy is to bundle everything in one place. You download this zip and it just works - the compiler is included, the libs are included, the main code, and even a test database. They haven't looked at it yet but in all my own tests, it legitimately just works. You can start playing around with it in a matter of minutes. I sometimes think about doing basically the same thing for open source D users too. Package my libs in with the compiler, a sqlite and openssl binary build so those just work too, and then some cute examples to get started. I imagine it'd be pretty easy and since my stuff covers such a broad range - terminal, gui, game, web, etc. - there'd likely be something fun in there for anyone. I even wrote a bunch of basic games as simpledisplay examples: http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/arsd.simpledisplay.html#pong so a fun little thing to start with there. I just haven't actually gotten around to trying it. Just on the other hand, I don't do much marketing at all so even if it was perfect nobody would know about it lololol
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 13:51:03 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: foundation modules (0 imports): oh, I forgot terminal.d in here. It is fun to combine the event loops of some of these, since I refuse to put a common interface in since that means another module. It tends to be implemented with template functions that talk to each other. Similarly, the @scriptable annotation's canonical definition is in jsvar.d - it indicates compatibility with that (though it is mostly used through script.d, jsvar is the foundational data type for the script language, so a lot of the script's runtime logic is actually in there), but it is privately redefined as a string in a few different modules, so they work together without needing to import each other. color.d and database.d are the two where I actually put in a new module to get a common interface. color.d because images and windows needed it, and database.d of course for those drivers. I sometimes regret it... simpledisplay.d was so cool when it worked by itself, and now I have better techniques to decouple, but eh, it has used color.d since like 2011 now so oh well. I also sometimes want to put in a foundational exception module. But again, it breaks my one import rule s yeah.
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 13:36:17 UTC, bauss wrote: Most of the modules in arsd can be used separately right? Yes, my policy is that the modules use no more than two other modules total. The ones below with a star* indicate default reliance upon a common C library too, like openssl. I try to avoid these too, but I'm not as strict about it. foundation modules (0 imports): cgi.d (though some individual functions, if used, will import more), http2.d*, color.d, database.d, dom.d, jsvar.d, joystick.d, simpleaudio.d, argon2.d*, characterencodings.d and more. next level (relies only on a foundation module): simpledisplay.d, png.d, sqlite.d*, postgres.d*, mysql.d*, mssql.d*, bmp.d (etc), script.d. And more. I also put minigui.d in this category, though it technically has two dependencies - simpledisplay.d, and through it, color.d, but still. nanovega.d is also on the same level as minigui, though if you use the image loader, it will pull in much more. next level (combines two modules in some way): database_generation.d, webtemplate.d, gamehelpers.d, web.d (which is my old web framework). So yeah, you can see the majority of them have zero imports, then most the rest have only one. Only a few do more than that by default. I say "by default" because in some cases, if you use other functions, it will import more. For example, dom.d's `Document.fromUrl` will implicitly import http2.d, or `parseGarbage` requires arsd.characterencodings, but if you don't use those functions, it will work by itself too. This is basically my solution to dependency management: just have nothing to manage! (similarly, my approach to version management is to just very rarely break compatibility. My desktop tends to run ~6 month old dmd and my laptop tends to run ~1 year old dmd too, so I have broad compatibility with dmd versions as well.)
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 02:32:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: ask me anything you like First of all very this nice and I have been using some of your work like terminal.d with very success! Second: I remember one of Bjarne's talk about creating some levels in C++ for getting things easily, it would be like packages for entrance level: Starter, Medium, Professional etc. Do you think that your libraries could fill this gap for D? Matheus.
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 13:24:02 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 13:14:47 UTC, bauss wrote:
And also CSS3 selector parsing (still not CSS parsing though.)
dom.d has some of that too. My css3 support is decent but not
100%, it includes :not, :has, :nth-child, nth-of-type and more.
I never implemented :only-child though, that'd be easy to add,
I should just do it.
I also have some css parsing, but it isn't amazing. see:
http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/arsd.dom.StyleSheet.html
you load a stylesheet, then apply it to a document, then can go
through their computedStyle properties. It is weird but I've
used it before for rendering html to text with color support
and stuff like that.
The file html.d also includes one of those css nested
expanders, so like
.myclass {
span {
color: blue;
}
}
expands out, this is on dub as `cssexpand`, but I haven't
actually used it for years - I no longer believe in css
preprocessors...
Quick question.
Most of the modules in arsd can be used separately right? Or at
the very least dependencies within arsd only, right?
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Thursday, 11 July 2019 at 13:14:47 UTC, bauss wrote:
And also CSS3 selector parsing (still not CSS parsing though.)
dom.d has some of that too. My css3 support is decent but not
100%, it includes :not, :has, :nth-child, nth-of-type and more.
I never implemented :only-child though, that'd be easy to add, I
should just do it.
I also have some css parsing, but it isn't amazing. see:
http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/arsd.dom.StyleSheet.html
you load a stylesheet, then apply it to a document, then can go
through their computedStyle properties. It is weird but I've used
it before for rendering html to text with color support and stuff
like that.
The file html.d also includes one of those css nested expanders,
so like
.myclass {
span {
color: blue;
}
}
expands out, this is on dub as `cssexpand`, but I haven't
actually used it for years - I no longer believe in css
preprocessors...
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 13:12:22 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote: On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 12:31:15 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 12:09:14 UTC, Greatsam4sure wrote: I don't know much about this project but l which to know more. My code is the oldest continuously maintained web library in D, started in 2008 and still developed today. It also does a bunch of other things like gui too. And dom.d is also one of the longest, still _working_ XML parser that is easy to use. Longevity and availability have value. Diamond has XML parsing and HTML parsing too (Not sure how well it works but it should.) And also CSS3 selector parsing (still not CSS parsing though.) https://github.com/DiamondMVC/Diamond/tree/master/dom https://github.com/DiamondMVC/Diamond/tree/master/html https://github.com/DiamondMVC/Diamond/tree/master/xhtml https://github.com/DiamondMVC/Diamond/tree/master/xml https://github.com/DiamondMVC/Diamond/tree/master/css
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 08:35:51AM +, bauss via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > Great work but the name of "arsd.http2" might be confusing to some because > of "HTTP 2" being an actual thing but that module has nothing to do with it > and is actually about Open SSL. That module is about HTTP, openssl is just an (optional) implementation detail for one aspect of it. But yeah, I've had to add to the documentation that it implements http 1.1, not http 2.0. My old http module is prolly deprecated long enough now I can just kill it and rename it, but meh, http 2 servers MUST implement http/1.1 as well (and provides zero benefits to me personally), so I see no pressing need to implement it. Regardless though, I'm kinda tempted to change the name, but it is a hassle. If it was 2013 and I was doing this over again, I'd probably have chosen like "httpclient" instead... but too late for that now.
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 02:32:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: I am bumping the arsd repo dub's version number to 4.0.0. (this is super super arbitrary for me though, I very rarely ACTUALLY break backward compatibility, in fact I try to be both backward and forward compatible with myself and with dmd versions, just meh) Anyway, while version numbers are silly, you can read a more informational summary of a bunch of the new stuff here: http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2019_07_08.html ask me anything you like Great work but the name of "arsd.http2" might be confusing to some because of "HTTP 2" being an actual thing but that module has nothing to do with it and is actually about Open SSL. I really like the database modules though.
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 12:31:15 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 12:09:14 UTC, Greatsam4sure wrote: I don't know much about this project but l which to know more. My code is the oldest continuously maintained web library in D, started in 2008 and still developed today. It also does a bunch of other things like gui too. How does it compare to vibe.d? vibe.d has marketing, I don't really care since I write it for myself. That's the biggest difference. From a technical perspective, vibe is committed to its event driven model, while mine is more flexible and can use any additional libraries and is broadly compatible with environments (including old style cgi, where it started). The only docs I have for it are on dpldocs.info. I have being on this forum for about 2years plus now. I have never add of the project. It will be better to set up a website or blog for it like vibe.d with a comprehensive tutorial to encourage easy adoption. It pays no one to keep good framework secret
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 12:31:15 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 12:09:14 UTC, Greatsam4sure wrote: I don't know much about this project but l which to know more. My code is the oldest continuously maintained web library in D, started in 2008 and still developed today. It also does a bunch of other things like gui too. And dom.d is also one of the longest, still _working_ XML parser that is easy to use. Longevity and availability have value.
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 12:09:14 UTC, Greatsam4sure wrote: I don't know much about this project but l which to know more. My code is the oldest continuously maintained web library in D, started in 2008 and still developed today. It also does a bunch of other things like gui too. How does it compare to vibe.d? vibe.d has marketing, I don't really care since I write it for myself. That's the biggest difference. From a technical perspective, vibe is committed to its event driven model, while mine is more flexible and can use any additional libraries and is broadly compatible with environments (including old style cgi, where it started). The only docs I have for it are on dpldocs.info.
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 12:13:13 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote: Not entirely true - there is a (pretty active) project out there called "Hunt Framework" - https://github.com/huntlabs/hunt-framework Fun fact: hunt framework bootstrapped themselves with my code! I don't think they still use any of it though, but their first few versions heavily relied on my lib on the inside :)
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 12:09:14 UTC, Greatsam4sure wrote: All the web framework only vibe was set up with business in mind. Not entirely true - there is a (pretty active) project out there called "Hunt Framework" - https://github.com/huntlabs/hunt-framework
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 02:32:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: I am bumping the arsd repo dub's version number to 4.0.0. (this is super super arbitrary for me though, I very rarely ACTUALLY break backward compatibility, in fact I try to be both backward and forward compatible with myself and with dmd versions, just meh) Anyway, while version numbers are silly, you can read a more informational summary of a bunch of the new stuff here: http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2019_07_08.html ask me anything you like I don't know much about this project but l which to know more. How does it compare to vibe.d? it even has http2. Where can one get a tutorial for it? It will be better for this project to have a website of its own like vibe.d All the web framework only vibe was set up with business in mind. I will be happy for your reply
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 03:21:21 UTC, ketmar wrote: yay, so your cgi.d and template modules are ready for public now! great. Aye, you can use them now. I haven't documented all the new stuff and I am still likely to change a bunch of details, so it is still kinda "use at your own risk of future breakage", but I'm happy with the core code now - cgi.getSessionObject, dispatcher, serveApiObject, all coming together very nicely, so I'm unlikely to make any major changes now.
Re: I was able to write some D last week!
Adam D. Ruppe wrote: I am bumping the arsd repo dub's version number to 4.0.0. (this is super super arbitrary for me though, I very rarely ACTUALLY break backward compatibility, in fact I try to be both backward and forward compatible with myself and with dmd versions, just meh) yay, so your cgi.d and template modules are ready for public now! great.
I was able to write some D last week!
I am bumping the arsd repo dub's version number to 4.0.0. (this is super super arbitrary for me though, I very rarely ACTUALLY break backward compatibility, in fact I try to be both backward and forward compatible with myself and with dmd versions, just meh) Anyway, while version numbers are silly, you can read a more informational summary of a bunch of the new stuff here: http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2019_07_08.html ask me anything you like
