Hello Nick,
re: the slides, are they avalable in .ppt or pdf for us ludites?
http://www.semitwist.com/download/NWCPP-D-meta-baxter-11-18-2009.ppt
http://www.semitwist.com/download/NWCPP-D-meta-baxter-11-18-2009.odp
OpenOffice 3 can open the original .pptx, but the font sizes are all
messed u
"BCS" wrote in message
news:a6268ffd6138cc3b42e6f50...@news.digitalmars.com...
> Hello Lutger,
>
>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>>>
>>> http://www.nwcpp.org/
>>>
>> slides are there! Very pretty, I bet it was a fine presentation. The
>
Hello Lutger,
Walter Bright wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
slides are there! Very pretty, I bet it was a fine presentation. The
slides are informative, good examples.
re: the slides, are they avalable in .ppt or pdf for us ludit
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Bill Baxter" wrote in message
> news:mailman.513.1259106953.20261.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Lutger
>> wrote:
>>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>>
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentat
"Bill Baxter" wrote in message
news:mailman.513.1259106953.20261.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Lutger
> wrote:
>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>>>
>>> http://www.nwcpp.org/
>>
>> slides are
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Lutger wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>>
>> http://www.nwcpp.org/
>
> slides are there! Very pretty, I bet it was a fine presentation. The slides
> are informative, good examples.
>
Thanks Walter, L
Lutger wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
slides are there! Very pretty, I bet it was a fine presentation. The slides
are informative, good examples.
Seconded. Very well done Bill.
Andrei
Walter Bright wrote:
> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>
> http://www.nwcpp.org/
slides are there! Very pretty, I bet it was a fine presentation. The slides
are informative, good examples.
nice work
Walter Bright wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
And Bill did a great job!
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Bill Baxter wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
>>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Bill Baxter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
>>> wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D No
Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
> wrote:
>> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>>
>> http://www.nwcpp.org/
>
> Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smart folks here
> if you could share your meta-programming favorites
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Bill Baxter wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
>> wrote:
>>> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>>>
>>> http://www.nwcpp.org/
>>
>> Yep, that's right,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
> wrote:
>> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>>
>> http://www.nwcpp.org/
>
> Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smart folks here
> if you could share y
Bill Baxter wrote:
...
>
> This is almost just a preprocessor macro trick, except for this line:
> mixin( FoldStringsOf!visitMethodOf( ["Sum", "Product"] ) );
>
> The essence is to generate a bunch of methods from a list of names. I
> was thinking to include a similar example from the worl
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
>
> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a prese
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smar
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Don wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside
the tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong. You
can't know if is(typeof(...)) really did what you wanted, or i
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:01:20 +0300, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:23 AM, grauzone wrote:
Don wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside
the
tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:23 AM, grauzone wrote:
> Don wrote:
>>
>> Christopher Wright wrote:
>>>
>>> grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside the
tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong. You can't know if
is(typeof(..
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Lutger wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
>> wrote:
>>> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>>>
>>> http://www.nwcpp.org/
>>
>> Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smart folks he
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:hdgt9q$vt...@digitalmars.com...
> >"Bill Baxter" wrote in message
> >news:mailman.337.1258023453.20261.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>>Hi Nick,
>
>>> === Compile-time checking on types with non-identifier strings ===
>>
>>That is kinda neat, I s
>"Bill Baxter" wrote in message
>news:mailman.337.1258023453.20261.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>Hi Nick,
>
>Thanks for the response. More below.
>
>However, the unescape() function used in traceVal looks like it might
>be a useful CTFE example. Some kind of compile-time string
>esca
On 11/11/09 17:58, grauzone wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Don wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles.
Inside the tested block of code, all sorts of things could go
wrong. You can't know if is(typeof(...
2009/11/10 Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:27:20 +0300, Bill Baxter wrote:
>
> kprintf (a printf variant) in XoMB is a nice example imo. It accepts format
> as a template parameter, doing all the checks at compile-time (and more).
>
> http://github.com/xomboverlord/xom
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the response. More below.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Bill Baxter" wrote in message
> news:mailman.290.1257812868.20261.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
>> wrote:
> I have a few things, m
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>>>
>>> http://www.nwcpp.org/
>>
>> Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to y
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:30:24 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
>
>Then different isXxxRange are used by higher-order ranges in defining
>refined interfaces depending on the interfaces offered by their inputs.
>I fail to see how that's terrible.
It is not terrible. It just doesn't give any clue
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Don wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside
the tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong. You
can't know if is(typeof(...)) really did what you wanted, or i
grauzone wrote:
Don wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside
the tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong. You
can't know if is(typeof(...)) really did what you wanted, or if
something broke.
You're
Don wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside
the tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong. You
can't know if is(typeof(...)) really did what you wanted, or if
something broke.
You're testing, "is eve
Christopher Wright wrote:
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside
the tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong. You
can't know if is(typeof(...)) really did what you wanted, or if
something broke.
You're testing, "is everything insi
grauzone wrote:
You're not testing for types, you're testing if it compiles. Inside the
tested block of code, all sorts of things could go wrong. You can't know
if is(typeof(...)) really did what you wanted, or if something broke.
So it requires caution, and you want to keep the contents small
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 11/10/09 01:27, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's right, a
grauzone wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 11/10/09 01:27, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to
Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 11/10/09 01:27, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smart folks h
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Lars T. Kyllingstad
wrote:
> Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>
>> On 11/10/09 01:27, Bill Baxter wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
>>> wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
On 11/10/09 13:29, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 11/10/09 01:27, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 11/10/09 01:27, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smart folks here
if you could share your
On 11/10/09 01:27, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smart folks here
if you could share your meta-programming favori
Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
> wrote:
>> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>>
>> http://www.nwcpp.org/
>
> Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smart folks here
> if you could share your meta-programming favorites w
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:27:20 +0300, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smart folks here
if you could share your meta-
"Bill Baxter" wrote in message
news:mailman.290.1257812868.20261.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
> wrote:
>> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>>
>> http://www.nwcpp.org/
>
> Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite g
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smart folks here
if you could share your meta-programming favorites with me! If
yo
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Walter Bright
wrote:
> Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
>
> http://www.nwcpp.org/
Yep, that's right, and I'd be quite grateful to you smart folks here
if you could share your meta-programming favorites with me! If
you've got a real-wo
Looks like Bill Baxter is giving a presentation on D Nov. 18!
http://www.nwcpp.org/
47 matches
Mail list logo
