On Thursday, 12 June 2014 at 20:35:39 UTC, Rounin wrote:
Hey there!
Yeah, to expect people to register on LiveJournal in this age
of Facebook... Sorry about that; It must have been to deter the
spammers.
I don't leave comments if it is run through facebook, maybe one
day.
There should be
Another hint:
You should return an `int[2]` from `abc()` instead of `int[]`.
It's faster and doesn't require a heap allocation.
http://rounin.livejournal.com/24639.html
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/27zjd5/pushing_ds_mixin_to_the_limits_project_euler/
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/864930913520591
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/477162603140374528
Andrei
Drat, I need a livejournal account to post comments? Well, I can at
least create a reddit account, I guess...
In the Ruby version, I was able to add the methods directly to the
Integer class, using what's known as monkey patching, allowing me to
make calls like3.pentagonal. In D, the methods are
On Thursday, 12 June 2014 at 20:35:39 UTC, Rounin wrote:
I still think the double mixin() can compete in terms of comedy
value, though, don't you think?
That was actually my initial guess when having a quick look
trough the code samples :) true D programmers mixin their mixins
Hey there!
Yeah, to expect people to register on LiveJournal in this age of
Facebook... Sorry about that; It must have been to deter the
spammers.
Thanks for taking the time to comment! Your solution with the
single call to mixin() is much more elegant. I made a version 2
which uses it.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Rounin via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Hey there!
Oh cool, thanks for answering!
Yeah, to expect people to register on LiveJournal in this age of Facebook...
Sorry about that; It must have been to deter the spammers.
