On Sunday, 23 November 2014 at 01:06:27 UTC, uri wrote:
On Saturday, 22 November 2014 at 15:38:35 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Saturday, 22 November 2014 at 06:49:04 UTC, uri wrote:
On Saturday, 22 February 2014 at 10:00:46 UTC, Namespace
wrote:
On a side note, the author in the code is Stewart
On Saturday, 22 November 2014 at 16:44:11 UTC, ponce wrote:
A tip to keep in mind when translating C/C++ headers:
---
enum Sass_Tag {
SASS_BOOLEAN,
SASS_NUMBER,
SASS_COLOR
};
---
is best translated as
---
alias Sass_Tag = int;
enum : Sass_Tag {
SASS_BOOLEAN,
SASS_NUMBER,
On 2014-11-23 01:26, Mike Parker wrote:
Some people may prefer the bindings to include more D features, but IMO
if you're going to put something out there for everyone and anyone to
use, particularly if you want to be consistent with other Derelict
bindings, it's better to avoid them.
For
On Sunday, 23 November 2014 at 19:36:16 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-11-23 01:26, Mike Parker wrote:
Some people may prefer the bindings to include more D
features, but IMO
if you're going to put something out there for everyone and
anyone to
use, particularly if you want to be
On Saturday, 22 November 2014 at 12:32:50 UTC, Lodin wrote:
Hello,
I've made a smaill binding to libsass - a C/C++ implementation
of
popular CSS preprocessor SASS. Binding is dynamic and based on
Derelict Project.
You can find it here: https://github.com/Lodin/DerelictSASS
It is my first
On 11/24/2014 4:36 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
For more D features I would add a thin layer on top of the raw bindings.
Like creating wrappers for functions accepting C strings and have them
accept D strings instead.
Right, that's how a wrapper should be written. But I don't think it
should be
