On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 10:58:57 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
That LLVM thing is surely nice to have but I highly doubt it
will be allowed as dependency for DMD.
---
Dmitry Olshansky
LLVM is purely optional.
A pure D interpreter exists.
LLVM optimises most ctfe btw and returns consta
On Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 08:34:06 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
No worries, I've been watching this space for over a decade. I
really believe you are working on one of the most important
parts of IT for the next decade. I am planning/making a library
that uses CTFE extensively and feel much
On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 13:51:55 UTC, Uplink_Coder wrote:
On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 10:58:57 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
That LLVM thing is surely nice to have but I highly doubt it
will be allowed as dependency for DMD.
---
Dmitry Olshansky
LLVM is purely optional.
A pure D int
On Monday, 17 October 2016 at 00:56:01 UTC, Uplink_Coder wrote:
If anyone want to take a look the lastest llvm_backend
development is happening here :
https://github.com/UplinkCoder/dmd/blob/_ctfe/src/bc_llvm_backend.d
The time llvm takes to build it's IR and execute the JITed code
is absol
On Tuesday, 18 October 2016 at 18:21:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please join me in welcoming Razvan Nitu to our fledgling team
of Romanian graduate students.
Razvan has already some solid industrial experience and has a
broad area of interests such as low-level kernel-le