Re: Codebuilder with line info insertion

2016-07-24 Thread Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 19:36:50 UTC, Dicebot wrote: How much of compile-time overhead does it add compared to naive string concatenation? I would expect fairly large, It only increases the amount of memory used and concatenation operations. It stores each requested string into array of st

Re: Codebuilder with line info insertion

2016-07-24 Thread Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
How much of compile-time overhead does it add compared to naive string concatenation?

Re: Codebuilder with line info insertion

2016-07-24 Thread Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 10 May 2016 at 15:42:00 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: 1. http://code.dlang.org/packages/protocolbuffer 2. http://code.dlang.org/packages/codebuilder 3. https://github.com/JesseKPhillips/ProtocolBuffer/blob/master/conversion/dlang.d I wish to announce version 1.0.0 of CodeBuilder. As

Codebuilder with line info insertion

2016-05-10 Thread Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d-announce
One of the things that can be really annoying about using string mixin's, especially when there is a lot of code, is that the compile complains about syntax errors on a line within the mixin that doesn't exist in the code. While at the D Conference this issue was mention along with the file/l