On Monday, 8 November 2021 at 12:02:43 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Saturday, 6 November 2021 at 15:46:57 UTC, JN wrote:
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 13:19:24 UTC, zjh wrote:
D can aim at `experts`, especially `meta programming users`.
On this point,`rust` can't compete.
`Silky general meta
On Monday, 8 November 2021 at 21:48:03 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 11:57:40 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
`-preview=in` will not be killed. It needs to be changed such
that:
* `in` always means `const scope ref`; the compiler will not
attempt to pass by value based on
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 11:57:40 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
`-preview=in` will not be killed. It needs to be changed such
that:
* `in` always means `const scope ref`; the compiler will not
attempt to pass by value based on platform-specific heuristics.
What about C functions? The ABI
On Saturday, 6 November 2021 at 15:46:57 UTC, JN wrote:
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 13:19:24 UTC, zjh wrote:
D can aim at `experts`, especially `meta programming users`.
On this point,`rust` can't compete.
`Silky general meta programming`.
Use my `strengths` to attack theirs weaknesses.
On Saturday, 6 November 2021 at 15:46:57 UTC, JN wrote:
This is much less of a strength than you think. For 90% of
cases, lack of metaprogramming is resolved by putting a Python
script in build step that autogenerates the necessary code.
Yes, I agree. For a single project metaprogramming has
On Saturday, 6 November 2021 at 15:46:57 UTC, JN wrote:
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 13:19:24 UTC, zjh wrote:
D can aim at `experts`, especially `meta programming users`.
Python script.
Although practical, it's ugly. It's no different from C++ macros.
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 13:19:24 UTC, zjh wrote:
D can aim at `experts`, especially `meta programming users`.
On this point,`rust` can't compete.
`Silky general meta programming`.
Use my `strengths` to attack theirs weaknesses.
This is much less of a strength than you think. For 90% of
Thank you, Mike. I love these digests.
On 11/5/21 4:57 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
> One of the things
> [Petar Kirov] would like to do is use DLang Tour to make all of the
examples in
> Ali's book runnable.
(That discussion must have happened when I had to leave to for another
meeting.)
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 13:19:30 UTC, Matheus wrote:
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 11:57:40 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
...
Nice summary, but why these meetings are no recorded or
streamed?
Matheus.
I do record the meetings to help me with the summaries. In this
case, I was unable to
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 11:57:40 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This meeting took place on October 22nd at 13:00 UTC.
D can aim at `experts`, especially `meta programming users`.
On this point,`rust` can't compete.
`Silky general meta programming`.
Use my `strengths` to attack theirs
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 11:57:40 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
...
Nice summary, but why these meetings are no recorded or streamed?
Matheus.
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 11:57:40 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
* The biggest languages have a story. (Java: write once run
anywhere, the language of the internet; Rust: memory safety
without a GC; Go: goroutines). What is D's story? It's not one
big thing, but a lot of little things, and
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 11:57:40 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Phew! That was a longer summary than I expected to write.
Whoa! Thank you Michael. That and the recent Youtube videos are
both excellent!
On Friday, 5 November 2021 at 11:57:40 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This meeting took place on October 22nd at 13:00 UTC. Apologies
for the delayed summary.
[...]
Nice summary! I got more confidence in the future of D after
reading this.
14 matches
Mail list logo
