On 7/10/14, 2:35 AM, Bob wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 15:39:50 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 14:57:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
My concern is that this shouldn't compile in the first place. What is
xyz?, Is it a free function? Is it a member variable or functi
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 15:39:50 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 14:57:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
My concern is that this shouldn't compile in the first place.
What is xyz?, Is it a free function? Is it a member variable
or function? In my mind it is neither of
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 14:57:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
My concern is that this shouldn't compile in the first place.
What is xyz?, Is it a free function? Is it a member variable or
function? In my mind it is neither of the two so why does it
compile?
Oh, but that's precisely the po
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 14:56:59 +, Andrew Edwards via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> My concern is that this shouldn't compile in the first place. What is
> xyz?, Is it a free function? Is it a member variable or function? In
> my mind it is neither of the two so why does it compile? Removi
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 12:21:20 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 12:11:13 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
remove the "string components" parameter form opDispatch to
reveal the same error.
Hm, could you elaborate a bit further on this? As per the spec,
opDispatch requ
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 12:11:13 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
remove the "string components" parameter form opDispatch to
reveal the same error.
Hm, could you elaborate a bit further on this? As per the spec,
opDispatch requires a string parameter
(http://dlang.org/operatoroverloading.html
On 7/9/14, 5:58 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 7/9/14, 4:18 PM, Bob wrote:
Hi, I hit problem with templates/opDispatch.
http://pastebin.com/rc09yWNt
% uname -a
Linux machine 3.11.0-20-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 2 21:32:49 UTC
2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
What does this event mean? W
On 7/9/14, 4:18 PM, Bob wrote:
Hi, I hit problem with templates/opDispatch.
http://pastebin.com/rc09yWNt
% uname -a
Linux machine 3.11.0-20-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 2 21:32:49 UTC
2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
What does this event mean? Where does xyz come from? The code below als
Hi, I hit problem with templates/opDispatch.
http://pastebin.com/rc09yWNt
% uname -a
Linux machine 3.11.0-20-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 2 21:32:49
UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
On 7/8/14, 11:39 PM, John wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 10:38:52 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
If nothing is identified, I will abandon the idea of providing point
releases.
Managing multiple Alpha or Beta builds with a1, a2 .. or b1, b2 etc look
good.
Adding another point-number to the 2.06
On 7/8/14, 11:47 PM, NCrashed wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 10:38:52 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The v2.066.0-b2 binaries are now available. The review period will run
until 0700 UTC ( PDT) 14 July 2014. Your assistance in identifying
and reporting bugs are
greatly appreciated.
Link to
On 7/8/14, 11:16 PM, NCrashed . via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Also the link on main page is broken.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13080
Also the link on main page is broken.
2014-07-08 18:10 GMT+04:00 via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com>:
> On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 13:48:45 UTC, kdmult wrote:
>
>> The download links are broken. They should have prefix http:// instead
>> of ftp://.
>>
>
> Hmm... th
On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 10:38:52 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The v2.066.0-b2 binaries are now available. The review period
will run until 0700 UTC ( PDT) 14 July 2014. Your
assistance in identifying and reporting bugs are
greatly appreciated.
Link to this post on dlang.org main page is
On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 10:38:52 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
If nothing is identified, I will abandon the idea of providing
point releases.
Managing multiple Alpha or Beta builds with a1, a2 .. or b1, b2
etc look good.
Adding another point-number to the 2.066 like 2.066.1 is a
needless co
On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 13:48:45 UTC, kdmult wrote:
The download links are broken. They should have prefix http://
instead of ftp://.
Hmm... they work for me.
The download links are broken. They should have prefix http://
instead of ftp://.
17 matches
Mail list logo
