Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On 7/17/14, 6:35 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote: That actually have already prepared this for B5. Actually, I have prepared this for B5.
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On 7/17/14, 2:09 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 7/16/14, 4:05 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote: H... Seems copy and paste only works when the person doing it is smart enough to do it correctly. Sorry about that. Binaries are located here: [snip] Idea: how about pasting all of that stuff in a wiki page? Then we'd link the wikipage from the homepage, and links work by clicking on them etc. -- Andrei That actually have already prepared this for B5.
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
Has anyone looked at this one? http://forum.dlang.org/thread/woisusrrxkjivwpci...@forum.dlang.org I'm not submitting a pull request for my proposed "fix", because it doesn't fix the underlying issue(s). It's just a hacky workaround.
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On 7/16/14, 4:05 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote: H... Seems copy and paste only works when the person doing it is smart enough to do it correctly. Sorry about that. Binaries are located here: [snip] Idea: how about pasting all of that stuff in a wiki page? Then we'd link the wikipage from the homepage, and links work by clicking on them etc. -- Andrei
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On 7/15/14, 11:42 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:03:38 -0700 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: You mean http://issues.dlang.org? That's used regularly. oh, really? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12853 Whatcha waiting for? reports + pull requests please. Thanks! -- Andrei have no motivation. and no, i'm neither using github, nor planning to use it in the current millenia. I'm sure you have your reasons. The problem with an attitudes like this is they're a proxy for further and larger difficulties in working with a person. We're shorthanded enough to not pander to such. If you go to any OSS community, each has a way of doing things and can't possibly be accepting of anyone's idiosyncrasies. that's why i'm saying that issues.dlang.org is just a dust collector: no guthub pull request? your bug will sit in issues.dlang.org for indefinite time. so what is the sense in issues.dlang.org existence? it should be closed to stop frustrating people. There would be a lot more frustration if the tracker didn't exist. It seems you're not willing to look beyond one bug report that's not two months old. There's a lot of activity going on. Andrei
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On 7/15/14, 11:49 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:39:56 + uri via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: You spent the effort implementing a fix, the time talking about your fix but cannot be buggered submitting a PR for the fix? one fix at a time, not more. the first one is still sitting in bugtracker, collecting dust. maybe after it will be reviewed i'll find some motivation to fill another ticket... in a month... or two... or six... Our release czar converted it to a pull request: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2336 You should add unittests to your fix. I've approved this one but the best way to go if you want to be happy in this community is to get over yourself. Andrei
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:53:07 +0200 Lionello Lunesu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > It's fine, I can create the PR for you there is one already, but without tests: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2336 > You'll get the credit as well, of course. i don't care about credits, especially for such trivial fix. consider that code as Public Domain or WTFPL. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On 16/07/14 14:34, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: standalone module copypasted in comments. my fault, i'm really sorry. It's fine, I can create the PR for you, but I haven't ventured into the backend before, so your fix would be appreciated. You'll get the credit as well, of course.
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:19:43 + Dragos Carp via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > Fix is in Bugzilla attached, though without an unittest > demonstrating the error. test is in bugzilla, but it's not formatted as unittest, just as standalone module copypasted in comments. my fault, i'm really sorry. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 09:32:42 UTC, Lionello Lunesu wrote: Then paste the fix here and allow somebody else to do the boring PR stuff for you. Just saying "I've got a fix but not sharing" sounds childish. Fix is in Bugzilla attached, though without an unittest demonstrating the error.
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 04:56:14 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: bug tracker is just a thing to collecting dust. you can write your report there, or to /dev/null, or not write it at all -- the result will be the same. i know at least 3 bugs in phobos and at least one very nasty bug in compiler (which causes UB, so-called heisenbug), but have no motivation to report. did i mention that i have fixes too? but it's ok, spice must flow, new releases must be done. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2336
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
H... Seems copy and paste only works when the person doing it is smart enough to do it correctly. Sorry about that. Binaries are located here: ALL http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.zip FREEBSD http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.freebsd-32.zip http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.freebsd-64.zip LINUX http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.linux.zip http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd_2.066.0~b4-0_i386.deb http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd_2.066.0~b4-0_amd64.deb http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/libphobos2-66_2.066.0~b4-0_i386.deb http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/libphobos2-66_2.066.0~b4-0_amd64.deb http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd-2.066.0~b4-0.fedora.i386.rpm http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd-2.066.0~b4-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd-2.066.0~b4-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd-2.066.0~b4-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm OSX http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.osx.zip http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.dmg WINDOWS http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.windows.zip http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd-2.066.0-b4.exe
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On 16/07/14 00:40, Andrew Edwards wrote: Binaries are located here: >... None of these links appear to work for me. (And this time I can't blame the Chinese firewall.) L.
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 06:56:24 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:03:38 -0700 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: You mean http://issues.dlang.org? That's used regularly. oh, really? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12853 Whatcha waiting for? reports + pull requests please. Thanks! -- Andrei have no motivation. and no, i'm neither using github, nor planning to use it in the current millenia. that's why i'm saying that issues.dlang.org is just a dust collector: no guthub pull request? your bug will sit in issues.dlang.org for indefinite time. so what is the sense in issues.dlang.org existence? it should be closed to stop frustrating people. issues.dlang.org is primarily for discussing bugs, github pull requests are for reviewing fixes. Moving to github has a been a great success, but it lacks a lot of the features of bugzilla (issues.dlang.org) that are important for bug tracking, hence the split. Github, however, is *much* better for reviewing patches.
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On 16/07/14 08:49, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:39:56 + uri via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: You spent the effort implementing a fix, the time talking about your fix but cannot be buggered submitting a PR for the fix? one fix at a time, not more. the first one is still sitting in bugtracker, collecting dust. maybe after it will be reviewed i'll find some motivation to fill another ticket... in a month... or two... or six... anyway, sorry for the noise. i'm really annoyed and just wanted to tell the world about it. sorry again. Then paste the fix here and allow somebody else to do the boring PR stuff for you. Just saying "I've got a fix but not sharing" sounds childish.
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 06:56:24 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:03:38 -0700 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: You mean http://issues.dlang.org? That's used regularly. oh, really? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12853 Yes. Issues can sit for years before getting fixed, it is normal workflow for situation when there are much more issue reporters than developers. so what is the sense in issues.dlang.org existence? it should be closed to stop frustrating people. close all bug trackers -> no more bugs -> declare perfect D stability sounds like a plan :D
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:03:38 -0700 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > You mean http://issues.dlang.org? That's used regularly. oh, really? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12853 > Whatcha waiting for? reports + pull requests please. Thanks! -- Andrei have no motivation. and no, i'm neither using github, nor planning to use it in the current millenia. that's why i'm saying that issues.dlang.org is just a dust collector: no guthub pull request? your bug will sit in issues.dlang.org for indefinite time. so what is the sense in issues.dlang.org existence? it should be closed to stop frustrating people. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:39:56 + uri via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: > You spent the effort implementing a fix, the time talking about > your fix but cannot be buggered submitting a PR for the fix? one fix at a time, not more. the first one is still sitting in bugtracker, collecting dust. maybe after it will be reviewed i'll find some motivation to fill another ticket... in a month... or two... or six... anyway, sorry for the noise. i'm really annoyed and just wanted to tell the world about it. sorry again. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 04:56:14 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: bug tracker is just a thing to collecting dust. you can write your report there, or to /dev/null, or not write it at all -- the result will be the same. i know at least 3 bugs in phobos and at least one very nasty bug in compiler (which causes UB, so-called heisenbug), but have no motivation to report. did i mention that i have fixes too? but it's ok, spice must flow, new releases must be done. You spent the effort implementing a fix, the time talking about your fix but cannot be buggered submitting a PR for the fix? D has a problem ATM of too many talkers, not enough doers. Please submit a PR if you have a fix for anything in the bug tracker. bye, uri
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
"safety0ff" wrote in message news:xfceasqsqxxygwzsc...@forum.dlang.org... I have a kludge / patch for #11435, but I get the impression of apathy towards back end issues so I don't feel motivated to contribute. Are you joking? Do a pull request.
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On 7/15/14, 9:43 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: bug tracker is just a thing to collecting dust. you can write your report there, or to /dev/null, or not write it at all -- the result will be the same. You mean http://issues.dlang.org? That's used regularly. i know at least 3 bugs in phobos and at least one very nasty bug in compiler (which causes UB, so-called heisenbug), but have no motivation to report. did i mention that i have fixes too? Whatcha waiting for? reports + pull requests please. Thanks! -- Andrei
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
bug tracker is just a thing to collecting dust. you can write your report there, or to /dev/null, or not write it at all -- the result will be the same. i know at least 3 bugs in phobos and at least one very nasty bug in compiler (which causes UB, so-called heisenbug), but have no motivation to report. did i mention that i have fixes too? but it's ok, spice must flow, new releases must be done. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: DMD v2.066.0-b4
On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 at 22:40:02 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote: Outstanding regressions impeding release are: It would be nice if back-end issues got some attention prior to releases. For example: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9465 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11435 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12164 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12503 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12833 https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13023 Code gen bugs can cause "dynamic regressions" in user code if a change causes a different compiler path to be used. I have a kludge / patch for #11435, but I get the impression of apathy towards back end issues so I don't feel motivated to contribute.
