On Thursday, 9 November 2023 at 07:01:23 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Thursday, 9 November 2023 at 04:02:48 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
Yes, the wasmgc's main selling point is the sharing of GC and
TypeInfo between Javascript and WASM.
Not just javascript, but any WASM runtime.
Sharing of data
On Thursday, 9 November 2023 at 04:02:48 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
Yes, the wasmgc's main selling point is the sharing of GC and
TypeInfo between Javascript and WASM.
Not just javascript, but any WASM runtime.
Sharing of data between the JS/WASM are problematic. JS has no
destructor, so it
On Wednesday, 8 November 2023 at 13:52:34 UTC, Richard (Rikki)
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
On 09/11/2023 2:42 AM, Hipreme wrote:
If the runtime is not revived, there is no point in having a
GC at all, and it is impossible to use the GC without the
runtime, but runtime without the GC, it is
On 09/11/2023 2:42 AM, Hipreme wrote:
If the runtime is not revived, there is no point in having a GC at all,
and it is impossible to use the GC without the runtime, but runtime
without the GC, it is possible :)
That's not true.
You wouldn't need anything in druntime to make the wasm GC
On Wednesday, 8 November 2023 at 13:29:46 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 November 2023 at 09:06:31 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2023 at 23:44:11 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2023 at 11:05:45 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
[...]
Unsure how it's
On Wednesday, 8 November 2023 at 09:06:31 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2023 at 23:44:11 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2023 at 11:05:45 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
https://llvm.org/devmtg/2022-11/slides/TechTalk3-ClangClang-WebAssembly.pdf
llvm ir seems
On Monday, 6 November 2023 at 23:44:11 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2023 at 11:05:45 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
https://llvm.org/devmtg/2022-11/slides/TechTalk3-ClangClang-WebAssembly.pdf
llvm ir seems to have support for the reftype(gc). so it a
compiler problem?
Unsure
On Monday, 6 November 2023 at 11:05:45 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
https://llvm.org/devmtg/2022-11/slides/TechTalk3-ClangClang-WebAssembly.pdf
llvm ir seems to have support for the reftype(gc). so it a
compiler problem?
Unsure how it's progressed since but as can be seen on the last
slide
On Monday, 6 November 2023 at 11:05:45 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2023 at 00:47:43 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2023 at 16:18:53 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2023 at 01:28:25 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
On Monday, 6 November 2023 at 00:47:43 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2023 at 16:18:53 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2023 at 01:28:25 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
https://v8.dev/blog/wasm-gc-porting
wasmgc is shipping. any plan for porting?
My understanding is
On Sunday, 5 November 2023 at 16:18:53 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
On Sunday, 5 November 2023 at 01:28:25 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
https://v8.dev/blog/wasm-gc-porting
wasmgc is shipping. any plan for porting?
My understanding is that it requires emitting dedicated
instructions for allocating
On 06/11/2023 5:18 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
I am not sure what a possible path to support should look like, aside
from writing a complete fresh backend.
I don't think it would be a whole new backend. The output is the LLVM IR
essentially, so its just the glue code that would need to be
On Sunday, 5 November 2023 at 01:28:25 UTC, Lingo Chen wrote:
https://v8.dev/blog/wasm-gc-porting
wasmgc is shipping. any plan for porting?
My understanding is that it requires emitting dedicated
instructions for allocating such objects, as well as dedicated
instructions for accessing them.
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 22:39:36 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 22:14:23 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
One question. Does GC work with Adam's druntime for wasm?
I haven't actually written one yet, so it leaks if you don't
pay attention yourself. But I have a plan
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 22:39:36 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 22:14:23 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş
wrote:
One question. Does GC work with Adam's druntime for wasm?
I haven't actually written one yet, so it leaks if you don't
pay attention yourself. But I have a plan
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 12:52:43 UTC, Hipreme wrote:
Hello people. I have tried working again with adam's wasm
minimal runtime, and yesterday I was able to make a great
progress on it.
Awesome! To think that custom druntime can get you out of
platform situations is great risk
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 22:14:23 UTC, Ferhat Kurtulmuş wrote:
One question. Does GC work with Adam's druntime for wasm?
I haven't actually written one yet, so it leaks if you don't pay
attention yourself. But I have a plan that should work: you do
the setTimeout(collect, 0) so it runs
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 22:13:15 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
The big question I have right now is, what's the status of
interfacing with web APIs such as WebGL?
This part is really easy, you can call it from D with the
opDispatch or pass it through as eval strings.
On Friday, 6 January 2023 at 12:52:43 UTC, Hipreme wrote:
Hello people. I have tried working again with adam's wasm
minimal runtime, and yesterday I was able to make a great
progress on it.
[...]
This sounds great. Thank you for your efforts. I will play around
with it someday. I have not
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 12:52:43PM +, Hipreme via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Hello people. I have tried working again with adam's wasm minimal
> runtime, and yesterday I was able to make a great progress on it.
[...]
> All those tests are currently passing. That means we almost got all
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
