On 4/27/16 2:36 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead of 9:00
AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well. Please reply with
thoughts on this! We're particularly concerned about folks who need to
take off early on Friday. -- Andrei
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On 04/28/2016 12:31 PM, Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
> But hey they'll be
> recorded right?
Yep.
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 05:10:25 UTC, Mithun Hunsur wrote:
On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 04:47:38 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
[...]
Aha - if Google Maps is accurate, I have nothing to worry about
:) For reference, the number it gives me is 37 minutes.
In that case, +1 to starting late; t
On 28 April 2016 at 07:10, Mithun Hunsur via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 04:47:38 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
>>
>> On 28 Apr 2016 6:30 AM, "Mithun Hunsur via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
>> digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmm; my talk's at 3:30pm o
On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 04:47:38 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
On 28 Apr 2016 6:30 AM, "Mithun Hunsur via
Digitalmars-d-announce" < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 03:44:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei
On 28 Apr 2016 6:30 AM, "Mithun Hunsur via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 03:44:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>
>>> The folks at Sociomantic suggest
On Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 03:44:51 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM
instead of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as
well. Please reply with thoughts on this!
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 18:36:54 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead
of 9:00 AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well.
Please reply with thoughts on this! We're particularly
concerned about folks who need to take off e
On 4/27/16 2:36 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The folks at Sociomantic suggested to start at 10:00 AM instead of 9:00
AM, therefore shifting the end time by one as well. Please reply with
thoughts on this! We're particularly concerned about folks who need to
take off early on Friday. -- Andrei
20 matches
Mail list logo