Re: Spasm 0.1.3 released - with bindings to web apis

2019-01-31 Thread kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 09:21:45 UTC, Thomas Brix Larsen wrote: The targets wasm32 and wasm64 are missing in the Arch package. Ah, too bad. wasm is still considered an experimental LLVM target (at least for LLVM 7), so LLVM needs to be built in a special way

Re: Spasm 0.1.3 released - with bindings to web apis

2019-01-31 Thread Thomas Brix Larsen via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 11:49:17 UTC, kinke wrote: On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 11:03:13 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: I install LDC from the arch repositories, which should just be the prebuilt binaries from the ldc repo I think Nope, they aren't. I guess your problem is that you

Re: Spasm 0.1.3 released - with bindings to web apis

2019-01-30 Thread kinke via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 11:03:13 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: I install LDC from the arch repositories, which should just be the prebuilt binaries from the ldc repo I think Nope, they aren't. I guess your problem is that you cannot *link* wasm; that will only work with v1.14 for distro

Re: Spasm 0.1.3 released - with bindings to web apis

2019-01-30 Thread WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 08:26:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 00:22:15 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: the underrun example looks really cool! I'm on linux but I don't use docker Wait, you are on linux. Why doesn't your ldc have wasm target? How did you

Re: Spasm 0.1.3 released - with bindings to web apis

2019-01-30 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 00:22:15 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: the underrun example looks really cool! I'm on linux but I don't use docker Wait, you are on linux. Why doesn't your ldc have wasm target? How did you install it? I will try out making something with spasm soon! Cool.

Re: Spasm 0.1.3 released - with bindings to web apis

2019-01-29 Thread WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Sunday, 27 January 2019 at 09:22:19 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: On Saturday, 26 January 2019 at 15:34:15 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: amazing! I would really like to try it but it seem the precompiled LDC version doesn't support the wasm output and I have no idea what that wercker stuff is you

Re: Spasm 0.1.3 released - with bindings to web apis

2019-01-27 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 26 January 2019 at 15:34:15 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote: amazing! I would really like to try it but it seem the precompiled LDC version doesn't support the wasm output and I have no idea what that wercker stuff is you mentioned or how to use the container you sent with compiling on my

Re: Spasm 0.1.3 released - with bindings to web apis

2019-01-27 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 26 January 2019 at 23:40:01 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote: This is really cool; nice work! Thanks. Are you aware of SignalR, and do you see something similar eventually being added to Spasm? I don't use .NET myself, but I once reverse engineered a signalR client for some data feed

Re: Spasm 0.1.3 released - with bindings to web apis

2019-01-26 Thread Mike Franklin via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 26 January 2019 at 10:24:05 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: Spasm is a betterC library for web development that uses LDC to compile to WebAssembly, and I just released a major update. It now has bindings to most web api's, like the dom, fetch, audio, webgl, etc. [...] See the

Re: Spasm 0.1.3 released - with bindings to web apis

2019-01-26 Thread WebFreak001 via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Saturday, 26 January 2019 at 10:24:05 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: Spasm is a betterC library for web development that uses LDC to compile to WebAssembly, and I just released a major update. It now has bindings to most web api's, like the dom, fetch, audio, webgl, etc. So you can do