Re: [Issue 1977] integral arithmetic operation only on int?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1977 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|spec

Re: [Issue 1977] integral arithmetic operation only on int?

Don wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1977 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Issue 1924] Allow pragma(msg) in CTFE

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1924 --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 12:05 --- (In reply to comment #7) To date, every use of writefln I've seen has been run time. So it doesn't seem particularly ambiguous at least to me, That's because at the moment

Re: [Issue 1977] integral arithmetic operation only on int?

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Stewart Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has the automatic relaying of newsgroup posts to Bugzilla been discontinued, or does it only work if the email address it's sent from is registered? It was probably the right thing to do considering the excessive quoting

[Issue 2474] New: Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2474 Summary: Recursive lazy arguments are inlined incorrectly Product: D Version: 2.021 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: