http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2772
--- Comment #2 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-03-30 14:36 ---
The problem is the response file is bigger than 64K. It's still a bug, though.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2772
--- Comment #1 from dav...@126.com 2009-03-30 10:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=308)
--> (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=308&action=view)
the compile.rf trigger the problem
the compile.rf seems to be too long that
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2772
Summary: lib can't open response file
Product: D
Version: 1.041
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2689
--- Comment #2 from s...@invisibleduck.org 2009-03-30 09:42 ---
Fixed in DMD 2.027. DMD 1.x still needs to be fixed however, so this ticket
can't be closed quite yet.
--
This will be fixed in DMD 2.027. I haven't looked into it for DMD1 yet
though.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=854
--- Comment #5 from fvbom...@wxs.nl 2009-03-30 07:29 ---
After some changes to DMD 1.041 to get it to compile on my machine, I managed
to verify that the attached patch fixes both the original example and the
dstress tests.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2742
--- Comment #2 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-03-30 06:17 ---
>But how many DOS or Windows console apps in the real world output UTF-8?
>Presumably not many, considering that no versions of DOS and only a few
>versions of Windows support
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2732
--- Comment #2 from hs...@inter7.jp 2009-03-30 06:02 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
real[2][int] hash = null;
real[2] v = [3,4];
*(hash[0])=1;
write(hash[0]);
// -> [1 0], very strange result. where does 0 come from? *1
hash[0]=v;
wr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=129
--- Comment #8 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-03-30 04:57 ---
Currently D1 development is focused on fixing bugs. This means that all bugs in
D1 should be really fixed, not just marked as such.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2742
--- Comment #1 from s...@iname.com 2009-03-30 04:40 ---
There was a brief discussion on this
http://tinyurl.com/c789py
but it was inconclusive.
Meanwhile, check out
http://pr.stewartsplace.org.uk/d/sutil/
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=129
--- Comment #7 from s...@iname.com 2009-03-30 04:27 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> A common convention (that I mistakenly assumed was followed here) is to mark a
> bug fixed when the latest version fixes it.
It's a convention as long
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=129
--- Comment #6 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-03-30 04:21 ---
D2 is not the latest version of D1.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=129
--- Comment #5 from unkn...@simplemachines.org 2009-03-30 03:47 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Note that this bug is not fixed in DMD 1.030.
>
> Then it isn't fixed. So don't mark it as such.
A common co
13 matches
Mail list logo
