http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4781
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2080
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3493
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3293
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4615
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4484
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #83 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-15 04:43:23 PST ---
(In reply to comment #82)
Anyway, unfortunately DMD development model still sucks, it sucks much less
than... let's say 2 years ago, but...
Walter is willing to slowly
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #84 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2010-11-15 04:47:48
PST ---
(In reply to comment #83)
(In reply to comment #82)
Anyway, unfortunately DMD development model still sucks, it sucks much less
than... let's say 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3749
--- Comment #8 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15 05:27:01 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=811)
PATCH against rev 755 add support for yl2x, yl2xp1
Implements yl2x, yl2xp1 as builtins for DMC, VisualStudio.
Needs implementation
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5205
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5208
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #85 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-15 09:33:56 PST ---
(In reply to comment #84)
I (and others) already suggested him how to improve things,
Keep suggesting those things. Sometimes you have to say something five times to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #86 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2010-11-15 09:44:18
PST ---
(In reply to comment #85)
(In reply to comment #84)
I (and others) already suggested him how to improve things,
Keep suggesting those things. Sometimes
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
--- Comment #3 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15 11:03:49 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=812)
PATCH against rev 755: implement a module import backtrace for static assert
Implements a module import back-trace for static
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5090
simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5090
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2010-11-15 12:11:09 PST ---
Just under the duplicate union error is where to look iirc.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4837
simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4837
--- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-15 12:39:53 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Created an attachment (id=814) [details]
PATCH against rev 755: remove superfluous asserts
fixed, no idea why asserts where placed in there.
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
--- Comment #3 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15 11:03:49 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=812)
PATCH against rev 755: implement a module import backtrace for static assert
Implements a module
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 15 November 2010 12:49:05 Don wrote:
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
--- Comment #3 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15
11:03:49 PST --- Created an attachment (id=812)
PATCH against rev 755:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
--- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-15 14:11:15 PST ---
Extra note:
It's a problem of perception: typesafe variadic arguments don't look like
normal function arguments that you know are usually on the stack, they look
like
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2809
simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2809
--- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-15 15:06:34 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Mr Bs test case is wrong:
static assert((cast(short)-1 1) == int.max);
should be:
static assert((cast(short)-1 1) == short.max);
Not
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5218
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from
On Monday, November 15, 2010 13:59:10 Don wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 15 November 2010 12:49:05 Don wrote:
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
--- Comment #3 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15
11:03:49 PST
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5220
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2010-11-15 21:07:45
PST ---
As noted by dsimcha on Phobos list, ConvError should be left as a deprecated
alias to ConvException for a few releases to mitigate code breakage.
--
26 matches
Mail list logo