[Issue 4269] Regression(2.031): invalid type accepted if evaluated while errors are gagged

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269 --- Comment #6 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-08-30 01:42:25 PDT --- I think there are a couple of different issues here. Some involve forward referenced declarations, as you've said. But some of these occur because they have semantic run

[Issue 6573] Add isOneOf to std.traits

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6573 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc ---

[Issue 6575] implementing interface method by overloaded arguments

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6575 Mariusz GliwiƄski alienballa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6576] New: std.string.format for struct crash on Linux 64bit

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6576 Summary: std.string.format for struct crash on Linux 64bit Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 6577] New: 'Cannot initialize member' error line number

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6577 Summary: 'Cannot initialize member' error line number Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: diagnostic Severity: major

[Issue 6576] std.string.format for struct crash on Linux 64bit

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6576 --- Comment #1 from rk3...@gmail.com 2011-08-30 03:19:11 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1020) Test code -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 6573] Add isOneOf to std.traits

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6573 kenn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kenn...@gmail.com --- Comment #3

[Issue 5249] Strongly pure random generator

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5249 --- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-08-30 04:49:26 PDT --- In dmd 2.055 you are allowed to assign to an immutable value the result of strongly pure functions. So purity becomes even more useful, and things that break purity are even

[Issue 6578] New: Ignored const with struct with constructor

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6578 Summary: Ignored const with struct with constructor Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic

[Issue 6579] New: Calling static method should *require* using type and not instance

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6579 Summary: Calling static method should *require* using type and not instance Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

[Issue 3345] Static and nonstatic methods with the same name should be allowed

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3345 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com ---

[Issue 3345] Static and nonstatic methods with the same name should be allowed

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3345 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4269] Regression(2.031): invalid type accepted if evaluated while errors are gagged

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269 --- Comment #7 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-08-31 00:58:01 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) I think there are a couple of different issues here. Some involve forward referenced declarations, as you've said. But some of these occur

[Issue 6577] 'Cannot initialize member' error line number

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6577 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yebbl...@gmail.com

[Issue 3345] Static and nonstatic methods with the same name should be allowed

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3345 --- Comment #3 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-08-30 08:27:11 PDT --- I would argue that it should be allowed because there's no ambiguity, for two reasons: 1. That's the way it already works and changing it would break code and

[Issue 6579] Calling static method should *require* using type and not instance

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6579 --- Comment #1 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-08-30 08:47:13 PDT --- This is in response to: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3345#c3 It's only a poorly chosen name because of the way you can call static

[Issue 3345] Static and nonstatic methods with the same name should be allowed

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3345 --- Comment #4 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-08-30 08:47:55 PDT --- I don't want to drag discussions for bug 6579 here, so I responded to your argument in that bug. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6144] Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=00428DA3

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6144 --- Comment #3 from Jesse Phillips jesse.k.phillip...@gmail.com 2011-08-30 09:02:36 PDT --- Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but I just get a bunch of question marks from the source/asm view. I at least now know First refers to the First

[Issue 6579] Calling static method should *require* using type and not instance, unless specified by author

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6579 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Calling static method |Calling

[Issue 796] Asserting a null object reference throws AssertError Failure internal\invariant.d(14) or Access Violation

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=796 yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|diagnostic |patch CC|

[Issue 6580] New: scoped classes are aligned incorrectly

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6580 Summary: scoped classes are aligned incorrectly Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 3862] std.file.copy does not have the same behavior as cp

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3862 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com ---

[Issue 6581] New: Yet another dtor/postblit problem?

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6581 Summary: Yet another dtor/postblit problem? Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 3862] std.file.copy does not have the same behavior as cp

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3862 --- Comment #2 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2011-08-30 14:41:36 PDT --- I think there's value in this insofar as we frame it as std.file.copy doesn't obey the principle of least astonishment. Taking a peek at cp as an

[Issue 6577] 'Cannot initialize member' error line number

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6577 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6582] New: alias this forward reference error

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6582 Summary: alias this forward reference error Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 6071] BigInt initialization causes compiler to hang

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6071 Paul D. Anderson paul.d.ander...@comcast.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6583] New: cast() operation not fully specified

2011-08-30 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6583 Summary: cast() operation not fully specified Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: