http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4539
--- Comment #12 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-09-05 16:30:28 EST ---
The current patch for this issue is
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/issues/164
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6113
Jose Garcia jsan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6113
--- Comment #6 from Jose Garcia jsan...@gmail.com 2011-09-04 23:41:09 PDT ---
While we are on the subject, does anyone have a suggestion on how to write unit
test that test this? Or do we need to extend the unittest capability?
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2350
--- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-09-05 00:23:54 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
In which case, what would naked do? If nothing, the compiler ought to
disallow it.
For non-naked functions, the contracts don't set up a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6601
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
--- Comment #17 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-05 02:53:08 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Let's use [,,,] for all ranges. Thanks Kenji for your work.
What's your rationale for this decision?
---
In 2.055beta
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
--- Comment #18 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-05 02:55:45 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
This is not good, because from the text you can't tell FP point numbers from
integer ones. In a similar situation Python prints this, that I
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
--- Comment #19 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-09-05 03:11:08 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #17)
This is not good, because from the text you can't tell FP point numbers from
integer ones. In a similar
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
--- Comment #20 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-05 04:12:39 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
If you want that result, following code will work.
writefln([%(%.1f, %)], array2); // prints [1.0, 2.0]
What I meant to say is that I'd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2904
Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrmoc...@gmx.de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
--- Comment #21 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2011-09-05
06:02:55 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #16)
Let's use [,,,] for all ranges. Thanks Kenji for your work.
What's your rationale for this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6604
Summary: Casting away immutable modifier does nothing
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6604
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6605
Summary: Add switch to enable setting library search paths via
command line
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6605
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6605
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-09-05
12:25:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Actually, you can do that with the rather obscure notation
dmd main.d -I..\..\src mylib.lib -L..\..\
No, you can't. That's
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6602
klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6605
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de 2011-09-05 14:25:28
PDT ---
Sorry, I did not think of the /NOI. We need a separator from the option, so
this line works for me:
dmd main.d -I..\..\src mylib.lib -L+..\..\
Regarding the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6385
klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6602
klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6605
--- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-09-05
14:31:25 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Sorry, I did not think of the /NOI. We need a separator from the option, so
this line works for me:
dmd main.d -I..\..\src
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6385
--- Comment #5 from klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at 2011-09-05 14:37:06 PDT
---
I think the problem described above didn't occur if the isInputRange
instantiation is inside a function, because then the instance was added to the
global list
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6605
--- Comment #5 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2011-09-05
14:43:06 PDT ---
FWIW I've updated the dwiki:
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?D__Tutorial/CompilingLinkingD#section5
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
--- Comment #22 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-09-05 16:14:07 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
more consistency is better than less consistency.
Consistency is good when the situations don't change. But in our discussions
the conditions
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6602
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6606
Summary: RefCounted doesn't work with unions due to use of
format
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6606
--- Comment #1 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-09-05 17:36:26 PDT ---
Actually, it's a problem with Tuple or format, depending on how you look at it.
This doesn't work either, for basically the same reason:
import std.typecons;
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6607
Summary: critical_.d and critical.c use double check locking
the wrong way
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3813
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6606
klickverbot c...@klickverbot.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@klickverbot.at
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6606
--- Comment #3 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2011-09-05 19:23:22 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
When did this first appear? 2.055 beta? Probably related to
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/126.
Yes, in the second
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6599
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6608
Summary: Tuple field is not escaped
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
33 matches
Mail list logo
