[Issue 4583] PIC code not working: EBX register set incorrectly

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4583 --- Comment #7 from Walter Bright 2012-04-27 23:34:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > This addresses setting EBX before the function call, not any other issues. Still, a couple of the runtime compiler helper functions pass arguments in EBX

[Issue 6169] [CTFE] pure functions cannot compute constants using functions not marked as pure

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6169 --- Comment #5 from yebblies 2012-04-28 15:02:07 EST --- *** Issue 7994 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail becaus

[Issue 7994] Impure mixin generator of pure code inside pure functions too

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7994 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 7999] New: rdmd eval fails on OSX, works on windows

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7999 Summary: rdmd eval fails on OSX, works on windows Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compo

[Issue 4174] Template interface functions not allowed, making operator overloads difficult

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4174 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 4174] Template interface functions not allowed, making operator overloads difficult

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4174 --- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-04-27 18:37:45 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/bb9200a4f80c912a4b9e4c4649307d86edb0624

[Issue 4155] return of NaN to temporary fails equality test

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4155 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 4155] return of NaN to temporary fails equality test

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4155 --- Comment #4 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-04-27 18:21:57 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/e1d597875183f58464ac44b8eb5d3d28f1f90170

[Issue 4155] return of NaN to temporary fails equality test

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4155 --- Comment #3 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-04-27 18:21:45 PDT --- Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/ac10c87904a73311eba93143d1aa92988227be4

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-04-27 17:04:29 PDT --- I would note that with 2.059, we removed support for Windows 9x. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this m

[Issue 3632] modify float is float to do a bitwise compare

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3632 --- Comment #27 from Walter Bright 2012-04-27 15:43:54 PDT --- Reverted because their tests failed. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 6552] Wrong fallthrough warning for CaseRange

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6552 --- Comment #3 from SomeDude 2012-04-27 15:07:07 PDT --- Allright, I overlooked your comment. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 6742] Alignments in std.variant.Algebraic

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6742 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #1 f

[Issue 3632] modify float is float to do a bitwise compare

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3632 --- Comment #26 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-04-27 15:06:20 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/f9c21c2a77e32d310c8cb9d6c23f517d410cbe

[Issue 6670] cast(shared(const(int)))a is not an lvalue

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6670 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #6 f

[Issue 6637] Postblits of static array elements are not called on function argument

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6637 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #2 f

[Issue 6642] SysTime should not be hasUnsharedAliasing

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6642 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #3 f

[Issue 6631] core.time module constructor runs AFTER main program's module constructor

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6631 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6636] Destructors of static array elements are not called on function parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6636 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #2 f

[Issue 6631] core.time module constructor runs AFTER main program's module constructor

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6631 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #4 f

[Issue 6598] Function literals are rejected by structure initializers as non-constant

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6598 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #1 f

[Issue 6588] Struct d'tors + immutable elements doesn't work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6588 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #2 f

[Issue 7807] Ambiguous virtual function error on const overloading with covariant return types

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7807 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 7807] Ambiguous virtual function error on const overloading with covariant return types

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7807 --- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-04-27 10:47:55 PDT --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/fecb72a7f64e346c27e082bf89efde83ff9ddf5b

[Issue 6552] Wrong fallthrough warning for CaseRange

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6552 --- Comment #2 from timon.g...@gmx.ch 2012-04-27 10:29:09 PDT --- No, it does not. Check again with the correct compiler options. (you need -w) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are recei

[Issue 7986] segfault in rt.lifetime.__doPostblit on array of struct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7986 Matt Peterson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 7986] segfault in rt.lifetime.__doPostblit on array of struct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7986 d...@dawgfoto.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@dawgfoto.de --- Comment #6 from

[Issue 6568] access qualifiers and delegate template parameter

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6568 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #1 f

[Issue 6565] out 2D fixed-sized array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6565 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #1 f

[Issue 6555] Problem with readf

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6555 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #2 f

[Issue 6552] Wrong fallthrough warning for CaseRange

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6552 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #1 f

[Issue 7993] BigInt divide-by-1 error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7993 --- Comment #2 from c.m.brandenb...@gmail.com 2012-04-27 09:06:38 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Which version are you using ? I get the correct result (10, 5) with dmd 2.059 $ dmd | head -n3 DMD64 D Compiler v2.059 Copyright (c) 1999-2012

[Issue 7993] BigInt divide-by-1 error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7993 --- Comment #3 from c.m.brandenb...@gmail.com 2012-04-27 09:08:30 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Which version are you using ? I get the correct result (10, 5) with dmd 2.059 By the way, these are all on x86_64. I've modified the 'Platform'

[Issue 6480] std.array.array can't handle const

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6480 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com Platfor

[Issue 5650] A RedBlackTree performance problem

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650 --- Comment #14 from SomeDude 2012-04-27 08:40:08 PDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I noticed that just after compilation, the first run is always slightly longer > than the following ones by about 50 to 80 ms. > > The other observation, -

[Issue 7993] BigInt divide-by-1 error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7993 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #1 f

[Issue 6434] opDispatch must be considered before alias this.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6434 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #10

[Issue 6430] Overloaded auto-return functions each with a nested aggregate of the same name are conflated

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6430 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com Platfor

[Issue 6432] Compilation doesn't terminate on a recursive mixin error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6432 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #1 f

[Issue 6429] Nested function error in reduce

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6429 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #3 f

[Issue 5279] Function-static associative arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5279 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #7 f

[Issue 6425] Cannot foreach over AA with char as key type

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6425 SomeDude changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com --- Comment #2 f

[Issue 7998] New: static assert message string printing problem

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7998 Summary: static assert message string printing problem Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 C

[Issue 7997] New: Optlink crash with static zero length array

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7997 Summary: Optlink crash with static zero length array Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Issue 7996] New: Refuse std.math.isnan() on not floating point values?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7996 Summary: Refuse std.math.isnan() on not floating point values? Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows Status: NEW Keywords: accepts-invalid Severi

[Issue 5650] A RedBlackTree performance problem

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5650 --- Comment #13 from Steven Schveighoffer 2012-04-27 03:29:07 PDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > With "scope(success) ++_length" in RBTree._add > the property calls are not inlined. Gr... I hate how dmd makes poor decisions about inlining an

[Issue 3866] anonymous delegate with default parameters cross-talks to another anonymous delegate

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3866 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 7986] segfault in rt.lifetime.__doPostblit on array of struct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7986 Matt Peterson changed: What|Removed |Added Component|druntime|DMD --- Comment #5 from Matt Peterson