http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8430
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8430
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3866
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8431
Summary: [Optimizer] Merge equivalent jump tables for switch
statements
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-25 01:31:21
PDT ---
Well, if it can't be done, I think that it calls into question the whole idea
of Voldemort types. In principle, they're really cool, but we keep running into
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8431
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8431
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com 2012-07-25
01:50:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
No need for final switch?
Why would it? Final allows @system code to omit bounds check that's all.
The presence of this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5939
Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8400
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8432
Summary: write needs to print full enum type
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8433
Summary: Compiler could warn on duplicate static if checks
which can't branch
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8432
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8400
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |regression
--- Comment #5
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8312
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-25 07:24:39 PDT ---
With this program:
import std.stdio;
void main() {
uint n = 1;
uint[n + 1] foo;
writeln(foo);
}
DMD 2.060beta prints:
temp.d(4): Error: variable n cannot be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8434
Summary: [2.060 beta] cannot implicitly convert expression
(vs1.opCast()) of type const(Vector2D) to
object.Object
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8435
Summary: BigInts don't work well in associative arrays
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8436
Summary: ICE: Internal error: toir.c 178
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8312
--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-07-25 08:02:42 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Probably the errors of the second program too are improved:
import std.stdio: writeln;
void main() {
immutable int[] A = [1];
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8191
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8312
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-25 08:27:31 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
No, this is expected behavior. With the declaration `int[A.lehgth] B;`,
A.length is interpreted to integer constant expression 1, then the type
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8312
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8400
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8434
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8437
Summary: [0.60 beta] static struct no size yet for forward
reference
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8438
Summary: [0.60 beta] delegate default arguments
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8433
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8433
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-07-25
11:12:27 PDT ---
I'd like to just keep this in Bugzilla for the time being. I know it's
problematic and might even slow down compilation considerably, so maybe it's
best
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8439
Summary: typeid fail to resolve symbol properly
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3866
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8438
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8436
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8436
--- Comment #2 from deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com 2012-07-25 11:51:09 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
It's related to failing to detect that one is calling a nested function from a
context where the context pointer to that nested function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8432
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-07-25 11:54:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
enum Type { Class, Struct, Enum }
struct Class { }
struct Struct { }
struct Enum { }
void main()
{
Type[string] type = [foo :
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8436
--- Comment #3 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-07-25
13:02:54 PDT ---
Knowing that it is related to the template version is helpful.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8440
Summary: templated functions + template mixins give conflict
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
David Piepgrass qwertie...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8441
Summary: function expected, not my function
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8442
Summary: [2.060 beta] Empty array enum not treated as immutable
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #15 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2012-07-25 14:55:34 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
+1 from me. Implicit static and (worse) implicit enum are bad ideas, and the
worst part is that whether it's static or not depends on
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8443
Summary: [2.060 beta] Win32 linker bug with separate
compilation
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8443
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8443
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-07-25
16:30:26 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
What happens with this same code on linux or osx?
It can't be compiled on those, WindowsAPI is the Win32 bindings library.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8444
Summary: Cannot use dot to disambiguate between local method
and class declaration
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8444
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8444
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-07-25
17:35:20 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Did it work in 2.059? Or is that what you're using? Even if it's minor, if it
worked in 2.059 and doesn't work in 2.0560, it
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3449
--- Comment #16 from David Piepgrass qwertie...@gmail.com 2012-07-25 18:55:01
PDT ---
How would the programmer suppress this warning because it's deliberate?
When I wrote that, I was thinking that the developer can initialize in the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206
--- Comment #11 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-07-25 20:46:01 PDT ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5206
d...@dawgfoto.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@dawgfoto.de
--- Comment #12
50 matches
Mail list logo
