[Issue 8651] Slice op Slice throws exceptions (not errors), and nothrow

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8651 --- Comment #4 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-09-25 23:26:30 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) And someday even [1,2].dup will be nothrow. Doesn't dup allocate? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 8726] New: About immutable and const constructors

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8726 Summary: About immutable and const constructors Product: D Version: D2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 1115] incorrect flow analysis for scope(failure)

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1115 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8255] [CTFE] ICE when passing 'ref' literal

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8255 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 1328] Default class template parameters don't work as expected

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1328 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 1536] Literal '0' is improperly used to deduce an implicit template parameter

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1536 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 1390] Implicit Instantiation: delegate args from variadic template argument

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1390 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au

[Issue 2456] cannot put catch statement inside finally block, missing line number

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2456 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8727] New: __traits(is_reserved_word, ) ?

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8727 Summary: __traits(is_reserved_word, ) ? Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: DMD

[Issue 6946] Compile-time flags generator

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6946 --- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-09-26 07:28:19 PDT --- See also Issue 8727 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 8727] __traits(is_reserved_word, ) ?

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8727 Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull

[Issue 8727] __traits(is_reserved_word, ) ?

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8727 --- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-09-26 08:30:14 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1144 Thank you, only 45 minutes to see implemented one enhancement request of mine :-)

[Issue 8727] __traits(is_reserved_word, ) ?

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8727 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 8728] New: Allow optional message for @disable

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8728 Summary: Allow optional message for @disable Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 --- Comment #3 from Val Markovic v...@markovic.io 2012-09-26 09:39:30 PDT --- Thanks for the explanation! WRT the regex string being faulty, I was aware of that; I was just experimenting when I encountered a segfault. Thanks for the pointer

[Issue 8727] __traits(is_reserved_word, ) ?

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8727 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8729] New: parse!bool does not work correctly

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8729 Summary: parse!bool does not work correctly Product: D Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Issue 7810] [CTFE] Typesafe variadic function with array of structs

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7810 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ctRegex!`a|b` asserts at|[CTFE] Typesafe

[Issue 8730] New: writeln stops on a nul character, even if passed a D string

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8730 Summary: writeln stops on a nul character, even if passed a D string Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor

[Issue 8729] parse!bool does not work correctly

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8729 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 8729] parse!bool does not work correctly

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8729 --- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-09-26 13:52:15 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) (In reply to comment #0) This code import std.conv; import std.stdio; void main() { auto str = 123 456.7 false; auto

[Issue 8729] parse!bool does not work correctly

2012-09-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8729 --- Comment #3 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2012-09-26 14:36:53 PDT --- FYI, parse!int also has the same problem. Only floating point types seem to behave correctly: import std.conv; import std.stdio; void main() { auto str = 456.7 123;