https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12438
Summary: Wrong code for result of assignment to `ref`/`out`
struct parameter
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12439
Summary: Can't access to property call result if the call is in
parantheses
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106
Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-22 05:28:41 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Is there any favour for renaming the other randomSomething functions and types
in this way? Note that one rationale for the existing names is by
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106
--- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-22 05:30:12 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Is there any favour for renaming the other randomSomething functions and types
in this way? Note that one rationale for the existing names is by
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106
Ivan Kazmenko ga...@mail.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ga...@mail.ru
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106
--- Comment #9 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net
2014-03-22 10:42:07 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Initially, I would have been against the renaming. The main argument would be
that what we have now is consistent
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106
--- Comment #10 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-22 10:58:29 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
to switch randomSample = sample (again maintaining an alias for the older
name).
Is randomSample a documented alias?
For this first
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9106
--- Comment #11 from Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net
2014-03-22 11:10:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Is randomSample a documented alias?
Is? I haven't even made the patch yet :-P But yes, it will be.
Then I
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12440
Summary: Implement whole-program analysis
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12440
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12434
monarchdo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com
---
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11461
--- Comment #13 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-03-22 14:59:11 PDT ---
Maybe the problem can be worked around by making the function(s) *weakly* pure?
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #7)
Commit pushed to master at
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9515
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3882
--- Comment #36 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-03-22 15:16:12 PDT ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12441
Summary: DDoc should ignore interleaved non-doc comments
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
18 matches
Mail list logo
