https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.023 |D2
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
--- Comment #9 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2010-12-07 04:08:05 PST ---
A similar problem has just cropped up as issue 5327.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
--- Comment #8 from s...@iname.com 2009-04-19 07:59 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
To me, that's the compiler being correct - quite a different thing from the
code being correct.
both functions have the same code.
That depends on
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
--- Comment #6 from s...@iname.com 2009-04-04 08:51 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
Where on that page is the issue addressed?
see Const and Invariant Structs
That bit talks about the whole struct being
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
--- Comment #7 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-04-04 09:16 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
That bit talks about the whole struct being declared const.
it talks about members too.
I meant, it's correct that error is given for broken().
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
--- Comment #4 from s...@iname.com 2009-04-03 09:09 ---
Here's how it would have to work.
Really, there are four constancy levels:
- reassignable (the default)
- mutable but non-reassignable (MBNR)
- const
- invariant (immutable)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
ma...@pochta.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||2573
nThis|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
Keywords|spec
