[Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4492 Infiltrator changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4492 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4492 Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4492 --- Comment #7 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2010-07-22 10:46:24 PDT --- You might misunderstand what I was talking about. I meant that specific example of a workaround won't work, not that you couldn't implement takeBack. As

[Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4492 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-07-22 10:55:26 PDT --- Ah okay. I did misunderstand what you meant. takeTail() probably would be a better name. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4492 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dsim...@yahoo.com ---

[Issue 4492] Version of take() which takes from the back of a range

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4492 --- Comment #3 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2010-07-21 19:16:35 PDT --- Two points: 1. Retro is not inefficient. For random access, there's the overhead of translating the index to length - index, but this is negligible in most cases