https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4520
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|D1 D2 |D2
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4520
Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4520
--- Comment #6 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2010-07-28
11:24:39 PDT ---
I'm afraid, it's useless. Doxygen uses its own markup and macros, they will be
treated as plain text in ddoc comments. It's useless.
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4520
--- Comment #2 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2010-07-27 11:13:46 PDT ---
Well it's personal taste.
As I said, only requires minimal changes to the lexer, Doxygen also uses ///
and //!, so why not? It's just a proposal.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4520
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4520
--- Comment #5 from Trass3r mrmoc...@gmx.de 2010-07-27 15:14:14 PDT ---
The patch makes //! treated as a ddoc comment.
As I already said, it's just a matter of taste. I prefer //! so I patched my
dmd to be free to choose.
I didn't claim this
