https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4699
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4699
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||issues.dl...@jmdavisprog.co
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4699
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|D1 D2 |D2
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4699
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||temta...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4699
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4699
--- Comment #3 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2014-03-29 12:21:31 PDT ---
Because the two functions named f0 are in disjoint scopes, the compiler
shouldn't care about the fact that they have the same name.
I can see a problem in that at
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4699
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2014-03-29 12:25:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
So this is presumably a temporary restriction in the
compiler pending a name mangling scheme that avoids this.
Walter could answer if this
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4699
Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4699
Infiltrator lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
