[Issue 4734] immutable return type specifier without parantheses confuses the compiler

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4734 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4734] immutable return type specifier without parantheses confuses the compiler

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4734 --- Comment #7 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2013-09-17 12:58:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) In any case, at minimum, the error message needs to be improved. How about we implement these

[Issue 4734] immutable return type specifier without parantheses confuses the compiler

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4734 --- Comment #6 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2012-10-04 16:15:50 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) In any case, at minimum, the error message needs to be improved. How about we implement these error messages like this:

[Issue 4734] immutable return type specifier without parantheses confuses the compiler

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4734 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4734] immutable return type specifier without parantheses confuses the compiler

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4734 --- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com 2010-08-26 14:53:11 PDT --- You are absolutely right. I forgot about the ability to make functions themselves const/immutable. It would really help if that right-side rule was in

[Issue 4734] immutable return type specifier without parantheses confuses the compiler

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4734 Stephan Dilly s...@extrawurst.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@extrawurst.org

[Issue 4734] immutable return type specifier without parantheses confuses the compiler

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4734 Stephan Dilly s...@extrawurst.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement ---

[Issue 4734] immutable return type specifier without parantheses confuses the compiler

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4734 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-08-26 15:47:47 PDT --- The error message definitely needs to be improved. However, if you're arguing for consistency, you could easily argue that the current way is not consistent