https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |D2
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #17 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-19 07:14:29 PST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
This is a bug in format. Even the partial fix I made for bug 5237, makes
BigInt
print correctly, without any change to the BigInt code.
***
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2010-11-18 00:24:35
PST ---
void toString()? Normally, it's string toString(). The only problem that I'm
aware of with regards to toString() design at the moment is the fact that it
must
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #5 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-11-18 00:57:38 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
What is worrying is that void toString is nowhere documented. Does std.format
use it or what?
Should be: is it supposed to use it? Of course it doesn't
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #7 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-18 05:58:20 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #2)
So BigInt's aren't printable via writeln in protest?
Yes. I refuse to play any part in propagating the toString()
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2010-11-18
06:30:23 PST ---
Pardon me for saying so, but that's too short-sighted.
first, it's not just a writeln/format change, it's a compiler change too. The
compiler is the one
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #11 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-18 12:01:39 PST ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
If it was just a question of inefficiency, I would have implemented it. The
issue is that it doesn't get the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2010-11-18 12:31:36
PST ---
So, you don't want writeln(bi); or to!string(bi) to work? I would think that
ideally, BigInt would work exactly the same way that integers do.
to!string(i)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2010-11-18 12:33:01
PST ---
Whoops. I meant %x, not %f for hex. Sorry about that.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #14 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-18 13:39:08 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
So, you don't want writeln(bi); or to!string(bi) to work?
No, that's not what I meant.
I would think that
ideally, BigInt would work
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2010-11-18 14:32:17
PST ---
Well, then I think that we agree on the desired eventual functionality. But I
do think that in the interim, it would be a good idea to add string toString()
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5231
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
16 matches
Mail list logo
