http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #18
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #16 from Denis Derman denis.s...@gmail.com 2011-01-24 05:40:24
PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
This wouldn't work because the dynamic type of the object being formatted can
differ from the static type the template was
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #17 from Max Samukha samu...@voliacable.com 2011-01-24 06:27:00
PST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
It is an obvious choice: programmers explicitely define toString (later,
writeTo) precisely for that ;-)
Denis
I agree that
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #12 from Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com 2011-01-23
13:28:48 PST ---
There are good arguments for going either way wrt the relative priority of
toString and range interface.
Using toString by default is in a way the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #13 from Denis Derman denis.s...@gmail.com 2011-01-23 14:25:33
PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
There are good arguments for going either way wrt the relative priority of
toString and range interface.
Using toString by
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #1 from Denis Derman denis.s...@gmail.com 2010-12-15 01:45:30 PST
---
started thread:
http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/2010-December/090043.html
I marked the bug(s) with keyword 'spec', as it depends on: how do
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
Nick Voronin elfy...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||elfy...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #3 from Nick Voronin elfy...@gmail.com 2010-12-15 10:02:09 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=849)
proposed patch
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #4 from Nick Voronin elfy...@gmail.com 2010-12-15 10:03:24 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=850)
testcase for various types
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #5 from Denis Derman denis.s...@gmail.com 2010-12-15 10:45:23 PST
---
(In reply to comment #2)
My thoughts:
1. Using Range interface for formatting classes and structs is a good thing
and
should stay.
Why? Please criticise
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #6 from Nick Voronin elfy...@gmail.com 2010-12-15 11:46:24 PST ---
1. Using Range interface for formatting classes and structs is a good thing
and
should stay.
Why? Please criticise my arguments above, especially:
*
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
--- Comment #7 from Denis Derman denis.s...@gmail.com 2010-12-15 14:36:42 PST
---
(In reply to comment #6)
1. Using Range interface for formatting classes and structs is a good
thing and
should stay.
Why? Please criticise my
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5354
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
---
15 matches
Mail list logo
