[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-12-01 00:12:43 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 --- Comment #3 from Val Markovic v...@markovic.io 2012-09-26 09:39:30 PDT --- Thanks for the explanation! WRT the regex string being faulty, I was aware of that; I was just experimenting when I encountered a segfault. Thanks for the pointer

[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 --- Comment #1 from Val Markovic v...@markovic.io 2012-09-25 22:33:03 PDT --- Oh, and the segfault goes away if I put the regex creation directly in the call, like so: writeln( replace( input, regex( r\*