https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8750
Seb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8750
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
--- Comment
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8750
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|major
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8750
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|DMD |Phobos
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8750
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Cousens daniel...@bigpond.com 2012-10-03 21:38:47
PDT ---
The intention of the above is: all!(x = x in R)(sw).
Therefore, the clearer code (still fails) would be: all!(x = any!(x)(R))(sw)
--
Configure issuemail: